Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've seen in many times. The narrator, that old NBC Newscaster whose name escapes me, was a perfect choice. And the commentary by Shelby Foote (Civil War Historian) ties everything together perfectly.So how many revisionist are already or are planning on watching the real story unfold year-by-year, day-by-day, piece-by-piece and fact-by-fact? How many new of it? How many even care?
No, I think he's saying the documentary is factual (which it is) as opposed to certain posters who are the revisionists.It was a good series. But I wonder... Since Marc AllTimeLoser is saying something about revisionism, I am curious as to what KIND of 'revisionism' he sees? Past history implies accurate historical information may be what he sees as revisionism, rather than political correctness.
Then I'm impressed.No, I think he's saying the documentary is factual (which it is) as opposed to certain posters who are the revisionists.It was a good series. But I wonder... Since Marc AllTimeLoser is saying something about revisionism, I am curious as to what KIND of 'revisionism' he sees? Past history implies accurate historical information may be what he sees as revisionism, rather than political correctness.
What the hell is Civil War revisionism?
What the hell is Civil War revisionism?
It's the 'tards on the Right who say the war wasn't about slavery.
What the hell is Civil War revisionism?
What the hell is Civil War revisionism?
It's the 'tards on the Right who say the war wasn't about slavery.
I dont consider myself a revisonist, but the reasons were more complex than just slavery. It did play a huge part, but in the end the real question that needed to be resolved was if a state (or states) could leave the union without the consent of the whole body of states. The answer after almost 5 years of war was no. Slavery is the main reason, but wasnt the main mechanic behind seccession.
I dont consider that revisionism, just clarification.
So how many revisionist are already or are planning on watching the real story unfold year-by-year, day-by-day, piece-by-piece and fact-by-fact?
How many knew of it?
How many even care?
What the hell is Civil War revisionism?
It's the 'tards on the Right who say the war wasn't about slavery.
What the hell is Civil War revisionism?
It's the 'tards on the Right who say the war wasn't about slavery.
I dont consider myself a revisonist, but the reasons were more complex than just slavery. It did play a huge part, but in the end the real question that needed to be resolved was if a state (or states) could leave the union without the consent of the whole body of states. The answer after almost 5 years of war was no. Slavery is the main reason, but wasnt the main mechanic behind seccession.
I dont consider that revisionism, just clarification.