The CEO-to-worker compensation ratio is now 312-to-1.

the other mike

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2019
41,753
22,358
2,615
Secret City under Denver Airport
The American dream is very much alive and well
for a few folks. ( According to a 2017 study by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI ).


The global elite are getting ready to gather in the Swiss Alps for the World Economic Forum (WEF), and while the backdrop may be one of “deepening gloom over the global economic and political outlook,” a new analysis reveals that for at least some of the attendees, the outlook is sunnier than ever.

Released by Bloomberg just ahead of the gathering in Davos, it shows how the net worth of some of the “gold-collar executives” that will be attending have surged in the ten years since the financial crisis.

JPMorgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon, for example, now holds $1.5 billion—a threefold increase over the decade. Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder and CEO of private equity giant Blackstone, meanwhile, saw his wealth surge sixfold, as his net worth is now $12.3 billion. Rupert Murdoch’s wealth similarly went up nearly sixfold, with his fortune now at $18.3 billion. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, for his part, is now worth $6.5 billion—a more than ninefold increase.

But, the reporting notes, while the economic elite are enjoying a bigger slice of the pie, for regular Americans, “Wages have stagnated and while equity markets have risen, fewer U.S. adults are invested in the stock market than in 2009.”

“The data illustrate the ever-widening gap between the true haves—those in the 0.1 percent—and the have-nots of a global economy,” it adds.

To further illustrate the divide, the reporting also points to a study released last year by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which found that in 2017, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 312-to-1.
Continued;

Davos Elites Are Wealthier Than Ever
 
Last edited:
Guess you need to work a little harder and get a better paying job...quit being jealous of what others have and worry about yourself.

Why do you socialist never whine about a football player making more per TD than most make in a year?

Why are you not complaining about the actor/actress that gets more per movie than any of us will see in a lifetime?
 
Guess you need to work a little harder and get a better paying job...quit being jealous of what others have and worry about yourself.

Why do you socialist never whine about a football player making more per TD than most make in a year?

Why are you not complaining about the actor/actress that gets more per movie than any of us will see in a lifetime?
Who are you addressing ?
I merely posted an article that has some economic facts
in it and you seem to be making all kinds of assumptions
without knowing anything about me.
 
Last edited:
Wonder why this post is getting zero conversation, does no one think this is a problem? or do most support the lack of balance between the slow growth of working peoples wages & the rapid advance of those who have more get more?
 
The American dream is very much alive and well
for a few folks. ( According to a 2017 study by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI ).


The global elite are getting ready to gather in the Swiss Alps for the World Economic Forum (WEF), and while the backdrop may be one of “deepening gloom over the global economic and political outlook,” a new analysis reveals that for at least some of the attendees, the outlook is sunnier than ever.

Released by Bloomberg just ahead of the gathering in Davos, it shows how the net worth of some of the “gold-collar executives” that will be attending have surged in the ten years since the financial crisis.

JPMorgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon, for example, now holds $1.5 billion—a threefold increase over the decade. Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder and CEO of private equity giant Blackstone, meanwhile, saw his wealth surge sixfold, as his net worth is now $12.3 billion. Rupert Murdoch’s wealth similarly went up nearly sixfold, with his fortune now at $18.3 billion. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, for his part, is now worth $6.5 billion—a more than ninefold increase.

But, the reporting notes, while the economic elite are enjoying a bigger slice of the pie, for regular Americans, “Wages have stagnated and while equity markets have risen, fewer U.S. adults are invested in the stock market than in 2009.”

“The data illustrate the ever-widening gap between the true haves—those in the 0.1 percent—and the have-nots of a global economy,” it adds.

To further illustrate the divide, the reporting also points to a study released last year by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which found that in 2017, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 312-to-1.
Continued;

Davos Elites Are Wealthier Than Ever
So, for every CEO we capped at 100 X average worker's salary we could give nearly 2500 of his or her employees a 10% raise? Or more of the company has fewer employees?

And without affecting product price or company bottom line?

I say it's time for some caps.
 
Guess you need to work a little harder and get a better paying job...quit being jealous of what others have and worry about yourself.

Why do you socialist never whine about a football player making more per TD than most make in a year?

Why are you not complaining about the actor/actress that gets more per movie than any of us will see in a lifetime?
Who are you addressing ?
I merely posted an article that has some economic facts
in it and you seem to be making all kinds of assumptions
without knowing anything about me.

I addressed the thread, nobody in particular. This is not the first thread of this type on this forum, won't be the last.
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!
Call it what you want but socialism saved capitalism's ass and is what the American middle class was built on after WW 2 . Minimum wage, Social Security, unions and government job programs built this country from the ground up after a depression and wars that could have made us just another third world country.
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!
Call it what you want but socialism saved capitalism's ass and is what the American middle class was built on after WW 2 . Minimum wage, Social Security, unions and government job programs built this country from the ground up after a depression and wars that could have made us just another third world country.

Which one of those programs interfered with a person's ability to make money? You are confused, and a socialist in that case.
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!
Call it what you want but socialism saved capitalism's ass and is what the American middle class was built on after WW 2 . Minimum wage, Social Security, unions and government job programs built this country from the ground up after a depression and wars that could have made us just another third world country.

Which one of those programs interfered with a person's ability to make money? You are confused, and a socialist in that case.
Actually the tax and anti trust laws were changed under Ronald Reagan in the 80's
allowing vulture capitalism in.
 
Guess you need to work a little harder and get a better paying job...quit being jealous of what others have and worry about yourself.

Why do you socialist never whine about a football player making more per TD than most make in a year?

Why are you not complaining about the actor/actress that gets more per movie than any of us will see in a lifetime?


It's not about being jealous. This is an issue conservatives are wrong on.

Of course liberals are hypocrites given what CEOs of large tech companies make compared to what they pay with little comment from liberals, but the fact remains. Multimillionaire CEOs are laughing their asses off as they pay wages so low that their employees qualify for welfare.

Of course part of this is due to illegal immigration. These people sneak in here steal identities and go to work, lowering the demand for workers. Lower demand = lower wages. That's basic economics.
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!

1. You think Japan is a socialist country? I don't. They recognize the value of the middle-class.
2. You think the middle-class should be eliminated like Pol Pot, except with stagnant wages?
3. You think the top 1% and/or the top 5% should own 90% of everything?
4. Yes I believe that there is a small group of greedy fucks that control too much, they are on all the Boards of Directors and do not do what's best for the country. Its all about getting richer.
5. I would support a law that limits compensation in corporations. They can keep their bucket of rice.

upload_2019-1-21_15-25-21.png
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!
Call it what you want but socialism saved capitalism's ass and is what the American middle class was built on after WW 2 . Minimum wage, Social Security, unions and government job programs built this country from the ground up after a depression and wars that could have made us just another third world country.

Which one of those programs interfered with a person's ability to make money? You are confused, and a socialist in that case.
Actually the tax and anti trust laws were changed under Ronald Reagan in the 80's
allowing vulture capitalism in.

You did not answer the queation.
 
Sigh. . . . If you read the Department of Labor's economic report for December, you will learn that wages rose by 3.2% last year, one of the biggest jumps in many years. Wages were virtually flat-lined under Obama.
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!

1. You think Japan is a socialist country? I don't. They recognize the value of the middle-class.
2. You think the middle-class should be eliminated like Pol Pot, except with stagnant wages?
3. You think the top 1% and/or the top 5% should own 90% of everything?
4. Yes I believe that there is a small group of greedy fucks that control too much, they are on all the Boards of Directors and do not do what's best for the country. Its all about getting richer.
5. I would support a law that limits compensation in corporations. They can keep their bucket of rice.

View attachment 241316

Failed economics in high school, didn't you? Those are all socialist in nature.

You mentioned Pol Pot? HILARIOUS!
 
I'd support a law that limits Exec compensation. Exec pay in Japan is about 10% of what it is in the US.
Japanese CEO pay roughly 10% that of US counterparts

That would make you a socialist. Wear it with pride if you truly believe that!
Call it what you want but socialism saved capitalism's ass and is what the American middle class was built on after WW 2 . Minimum wage, Social Security, unions and government job programs built this country from the ground up after a depression and wars that could have made us just another third world country.

Which one of those programs interfered with a person's ability to make money? You are confused, and a socialist in that case.
Actually the tax and anti trust laws were changed under Ronald Reagan in the 80's
allowing vulture capitalism in.

You did not answer the queation.
I know what you're getting at. Nobody will take 70 or 90% of your money.
Any 'progressive' type of taxes will be on very marginal levels, including capital gains, estate taxes etc.
But generally, we don't need 2000 billionaires in this country. We don't need Jeff Bezos being able to rake in $250 million a day while many of his workers can barely afford to pay their rent each month.
 

Forum List

Back
Top