Yeah we can’t have those government schools providing good healthy food to American children.
Exactly, left-wing dill-hole. We can’t. That’s not the job of schools and that’s not the job of government.
Works really well in France. Maybe we should do ghetto same.
No sacrifice is too great to save the greedy idiot GOP Rich from paying their fair share.
 
To be more clear, I meant that if you are strong you are more likely to see aggression as a suitable option. Dubya saw a weak Iraq and seized his opportunity. We're still paying that piper.

Good grief, when do you quit trying to rewrite history?

The United Nations authorized the use of force as well as the US Congress against Iraq. The resolutions against Iraq, over the years, are countless.
 
Yeah we can’t have those government schools providing good healthy food to American children.
Exactly, left-wing dill-hole. We can’t. That’s not the job of schools and that’s not the job of government.
And besides doofus, it’s not 1789. In your little deluded world, government does only what’s outlined in the constitution. Sorry to inform my little bitch, but that only exists in your wet dreams.

Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?








Ahhhhh, your true nature finally comes out. Statist you ARE it appears.



"Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?"
 
Yeah we can’t have those government schools providing good healthy food to American children.
Exactly, left-wing dill-hole. We can’t. That’s not the job of schools and that’s not the job of government.
And besides doofus, it’s not 1789. In your little deluded world, government does only what’s outlined in the constitution. Sorry to inform my little bitch, but that only exists in your wet dreams.

Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?








Ahhhhh, your true nature finally comes out. Statist you ARE it appears.



"Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?"
You cons are so crazy. You actually believe the government providing quality healthy food to American school children, is communism.

This is a good example of why most Americans turn away from you assholes.
 
Yeah we can’t have those government schools providing good healthy food to American children.
Exactly, left-wing dill-hole. We can’t. That’s not the job of schools and that’s not the job of government.
And besides doofus, it’s not 1789. In your little deluded world, government does only what’s outlined in the constitution. Sorry to inform my little bitch, but that only exists in your wet dreams.

Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?








Ahhhhh, your true nature finally comes out. Statist you ARE it appears.



"Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?"
You cons are so crazy. You actually believe the government providing quality healthy food to American school children, is communism.

This is a good example of why most Americans turn away from you assholes.






And you statists are worse. Every single one of your governments have resorted to mass murder to get your way. I was on a train from St. Petersburg to Moscow about 25 years ago and I was talking with a former government official and he told me that my country's terror was coming. He was right. It is here now. Just remember little troll. We are going to fight back.
 
Yeah we can’t have those government schools providing good healthy food to American children.
Exactly, left-wing dill-hole. We can’t. That’s not the job of schools and that’s not the job of government.
And besides doofus, it’s not 1789. In your little deluded world, government does only what’s outlined in the constitution. Sorry to inform my little bitch, but that only exists in your wet dreams.

Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?








Ahhhhh, your true nature finally comes out. Statist you ARE it appears.



"Government today does a million things every day, not outlined in the constitution. Of course most of what it does is to benefit the extreme wealthy, but we know your crazed ideology prevents you from recognizing this.

So my son, why shouldn’t government do things that benefits the people?"
You cons are so crazy. You actually believe the government providing quality healthy food to American school children, is communism.

This is a good example of why most Americans turn away from you assholes.






And you statists are worse. Every single one of your governments have resorted to mass murder to get your way. I was on a train from St. Petersburg to Moscow about 25 years ago and I was talking with a former government official and he told me that my country's terror was coming. He was right. It is here now. Just remember little troll. We are going to fight back.
The state already offers food to school children dumb ass. Why not make it healthy and delicious, as they do in France?

To think suggesting the state offer quality healthy food to school kids causes cons to revolt. Is it any wonder they’re dumb fucks?
 
You cons are so crazy. You actually believe the government providing quality healthy food to American school children, is communism.

This is a good example of why most Americans turn away from you assholes.
You statists are so hilarious. You actually believe that other people should pay your way through life, cradle-to-grave.

It's the only reason people need to turn away from you assholes. And they do.
 
Ahhhhh, your true nature finally comes out. Statist you ARE it appears.
I never cease to marvel at the ignorance of the left. They literally believe they can convince people to embrace communism so long as they trick people into thinking they are "libertarian" or "right-wing" :eusa_doh:

Probably because that would work with the left. They are that stupid. They don't realize that conservatives are educated, informed, and focus on policy instead of who is preaching.
 
You cons are so crazy. You actually believe the government providing quality healthy food to American school children, is communism.

This is a good example of why most Americans turn away from you assholes.
You statists are so hilarious. You actually believe that other people should pay your way through life, cradle-to-grave.

It's the only reason people need to turn away from you assholes. And they do.
You aren’t living in reality son. Your dream of limited government and individual liberty died. Man up son. Face reality.

I know you like government giving goodies to the ultra rich, but this isn’t fair. We need to help the people.
 
The left has been focused on the pandemic. Where's the President? What's he been doing, other than hosting super spreader events, and embracing the idea that getting sick is good for America.

IF the Liberals have been focused on the pandemic, why did they block help to those suffering from the economic effects of the China virus?

Liberals haven't blocked help to those suffering economic problems in the pandemic. The Heros Act was passed 6 months ago, and McConnell has yet to take up the bill.

It would be really fucking useful if Republicans didn't consider aid to working Americans as somehow counter productive to the economy, but since Republicans live in upside down land, and always choose the least helpful and most destructive economic course of action, this is hardly surprising.

Everytime-S.jpg


Either you are incredibly gullible, ignorant. Or, lying just comes easy and natural to you.

As you know, what the Democrats passed was a bill with a poison pill. A massive bailout to all the fiscally irresponsible states for the debt they had acquired and were unable to meet their legacy obligations.

Nancy refused to pass a rescue for COVID-19 sufferers for exactly what happened. I wouldn't have believed Democrats could stoop so low until this past 15 or 20 years. Disgusting.

How exactly are the states supposed to pay for covid testing, treatment, and additional PPE protections in schools, fire halls, police stations and other public spaces without federal funds? This bullshit about "red states and blue states" is both stupid and counter productive. Stop pitting your people against one another and start pulling together.

Stop being a pawn in these stupid partisan games, and start doing what is right for EVERYONE, not just your tribe. If you don't stand united against the virus, you'll continue to fall like dominoes in a row.







This is LAUGHABLE coming from a vitriolic partisan hack like you.

You fuckers bankrupt your States then come begging for the rest of us to bail you out.

Fuck you. You made your bed. YOU sleep in it.

Oh, LizardBitch isn't bankrupting any states. She's not American. She's a loudmouth welfare leech from Canada who thinks it appropriate to demand that we run OUR country to suit her, because sitting on her fat ass watching the media has made her so much more knowledgeable about places thousands of miles away from her than the people who actually live there are.

She has yet to explain to anyone why we're supposed to care if her ignorant, foreign ass approves of us or not.
 
The state already offers food to school children dumb ass. Why not make it healthy and delicious, as they do in France?
Because personalized chefs cooking exotic foods costs a shit-ton more, you high school dropout. Geezus, you statists are so damn dumb. :eusa_doh:

You can tell he's never set foot in a kitchen that produces food for school lunches, or any sort of industrial kitchen at all.
 
You cons are so crazy. You actually believe the government providing quality healthy food to American school children, is communism.

This is a good example of why most Americans turn away from you assholes.

Either you are a pathological liar or you intentionally incredibly ignorant. The failed former President Barack Hussein Obama's wife, Michelle, led a complete revision of the food provided to children in school. Everything was healthy, more vegetables, fruits, far less "bad" stuff. The result? Democrats HATE to measure results, they simply do things so THEY feel better, results are immaterial.

What did the kids do? They threw the food away! The food that ended up in the trash increased tremendously. If the kids don't have a good example at home, they're not going to change at school. The option is to provide the food they will eat or let the kids go hungry.
 
To be more clear, I meant that if you are strong you are more likely to see aggression as a suitable option. Dubya saw a weak Iraq and seized his opportunity. We're still paying that piper.

Good grief, when do you quit trying to rewrite history?

The United Nations authorized the use of force as well as the US Congress against Iraq. The resolutions against Iraq, over the years, are countless.
Dubya lied to Congress and the UN to get the resolutions
 
I loved that movie Michael Moore did where he offers French school children food American school children usually eat. The French kids reaction to that shitty American food was priceless. Every school in France has a professional chef who puts out healthy fresh food every day for the kids. How great is that?

alice-keeler-link-please-S.jpg
 
To be more clear, I meant that if you are strong you are more likely to see aggression as a suitable option. Dubya saw a weak Iraq and seized his opportunity. We're still paying that piper.

Good grief, when do you quit trying to rewrite history?

The United Nations authorized the use of force as well as the US Congress against Iraq. The resolutions against Iraq, over the years, are countless.
Dubya lied to Congress and the UN to get the resolutions

Either you are incredibly gullible or incredibly ignorant. Which is it?

The Resolutions against Iraq go back to BEFORE 1990. There are dozens.

 
I loved that movie Michael Moore did where he offers French school children food American school children usually eat. The French kids reaction to that shitty American food was priceless. Every school in France has a professional chef who puts out healthy fresh food every day for the kids. How great is that?

alice-keeler-link-please-S.jpg
C’mon man! You’re much to closed minded to watch a Michael Moore movie.

You can watch the trailer though, at the link. It even has the scene I referred to. I’m guessing you won’t.
A film by Michael Moore » WHERE TO INVADE NEXT
 
To be more clear, I meant that if you are strong you are more likely to see aggression as a suitable option. Dubya saw a weak Iraq and seized his opportunity. We're still paying that piper.

Good grief, when do you quit trying to rewrite history?

The United Nations authorized the use of force as well as the US Congress against Iraq. The resolutions against Iraq, over the years, are countless.
Dubya lied to Congress and the UN to get the resolutions

Either you are incredibly gullible or incredibly ignorant. Which is it?

The Resolutions against Iraq go back to BEFORE 1990. There are dozens.

Here's what I was referring to:
Powell consciously deceived the world in his 2003 presentation making the case for war with Saddam Hussein.
If you really do care about history, see also:
United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War
 
To be more clear, I meant that if you are strong you are more likely to see aggression as a suitable option. Dubya saw a weak Iraq and seized his opportunity. We're still paying that piper.

Good grief, when do you quit trying to rewrite history?

The United Nations authorized the use of force as well as the US Congress against Iraq. The resolutions against Iraq, over the years, are countless.
Dubya lied to Congress and the UN to get the resolutions

The far-left sure does love to re-write history. It was a lot easier before the age of the internet, wasn't it?

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or bi
- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

Former Vice President Joe Biden urged the U.S. government in 1998 to pursue a strategy to ‘dethrone’ Saddam Hussein over allegations the Iraqi strongman was hiding weapons of mass destruction.

Biden, the-then ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of President Bill Clinton’s most vocal allies in the battle to pressure Hussein to abide by terms established after the Gulf War requiring Iraq to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons. - Former Vice President Joe Biden 1998
1998: Joe Biden Urged U.S. to 'Dethrone' Saddam Hussein Over WMDs

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrit

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)



He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.
"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton
Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010


How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.




And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….

###

ttp://articles.nydailynews.com/2003-04-16/news/18226075_1_saddam-hussein-president-bush-security-council

We Fought A Good Fight, Clinton Says
BY JOEL SIEGEL
Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

He praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.




September 5, 2011
Great. They’re calling for open violence against tea party activists at Obama’s rally and at Biden’s rally they’re calling the opposition “barbarians.”
It must be more of the new tone we were promised.

Vice President Joe Biden told supporters today at his AFL-CIO rally,
You are the only folks keeping the barbarians from the gates.”

Joe Biden at AFL-CIO Rally: "You Are The Only Folks Keeping The Barbarians From the Gates" (Video)

Clip for forum about Hillar
Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010


How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.

 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top