You must have missed Vietnam and Korea...
When Debbie Wasserman married the creature from the black lagoon in 1991, then an nasty divorce in 1996, and 4 kids,,money problems, Creature having multiple affairs with very hot white women,,,thats pretty much a liberal policy failure
 
Notice the liar's method: Word your lie delicately as if to create a false narrative where Obama fathered a more bloody foreign policy than Bush.

Throw the Iraq numbers in there, you lying piece of shit.

How about a more asinine foreign policy?

We lost ground to a bunch of sheep fuckers.

Bush's policy worked to keep jihadists down in holes and easy to kill. The meat puppet faggot has them taking MRAPs from the Iraqi's he was happy to abandon and establishing territory they have the gall to declare is a state.

They print money and sell oil on the goddamned global market, and have the core of the middle east under tactical control. Please tell me again how that fuckin assclown's foreign policy isn't bloodier than Bush's.


Who cares? It's not our country. Never was. Even despite the Bush Doctrine of nation-building in an effort to bankrupt the U.S. at home.
 
Who cares? It's not our country. Never was. Even despite the Bush Doctrine of nation-building in an effort to bankrupt the U.S. at home.

Irrelevant.

It's past history and can't be undone.

We broke it, we bought it.

We fixed it as best we could but left it on the shelf before the glue set at the direction of a "man" who who wanted the endeavor to fail from the outset.

 
Who cares? It's not our country. Never was. Even despite the Bush Doctrine of nation-building in an effort to bankrupt the U.S. at home.

Irrelevant.

It's past history and can't be undone.

We broke it, we bought it.

We fixed it as best we could but left it on the shelf before the glue set at the direction of a "man" who who wanted the endeavor to fail from the outset.

We left it on the shelf under a Bush-negotiated timeline. The instability of the region lies at Bush's feet. Bottom line, we have no more troops coming home from Iraq in coffins (for no reason), and that's the way it should stay.
 
We left it on the shelf under a Bush-negotiated timeline. The instability of the region lies at Bush's feet. Bottom line, we have no more troops coming home from Iraq in coffins (for no reason), and that's the way it should stay.

No, we still have coffins coming home as recently as last week I believe, for a reason that shouldn't exist. It wouldn't exist if your moonbat messiah didn't let the ME spiral out of control with the "arab spring". He encouraged that, while ignoring the attempts to bring down the Iranian regime.

The Bush Timeline wasn't set in stone either, a contingency force would have remained but the messiah wasn't interested.

Bush made plenty of mistakes. I won't deny it. The messiah not only fixed nothing, but he allowed and encouraged other problems to metastasize.

 
We left it on the shelf under a Bush-negotiated timeline. The instability of the region lies at Bush's feet. Bottom line, we have no more troops coming home from Iraq in coffins (for no reason), and that's the way it should stay.

No, we still have coffins coming home as recently as last week I believe, for a reason that shouldn't exist. It wouldn't exist if your moonbat messiah didn't let the ME spiral out of control with the "arab spring". He encouraged that, while ignoring the attempts to bring down the Iranian regime.

The Bush Timeline wasn't set in stone either, a contingency force would have remained but the messiah wasn't interested.

Bush made plenty of mistakes. I won't deny it. The messiah not only fixed nothing, but he allowed and encouraged other problems to metastasize.

Iraq would not agree to a contingency force. Stop spreading lies. Obama ran on ending the war, and he did exactly that. This is a sectarian, regional religious fight, and it's not our fight.
 
Iraq would not agree to a contingency force. Stop spreading lies. Obama ran on ending the war, and he did exactly that. This is a sectarian, regional religious fight, and it's not our fight.

(I'm talking to a goldfish tank)

Iraq wanted the power to prosecute US soldiers. That's a no go, but they would have agreed to a contingency anyway.

Don't sit there pretending like obozo wanted to keep troops in there, but Malaki was being obstinate.

This "sectarian regional religious fight" isn't our fight. That's true.

If the wrong side wins, we're the only ones left for them to fight.

 
Who cares? It's not our country. Never was. Even despite the Bush Doctrine of nation-building in an effort to bankrupt the U.S. at home.

Irrelevant.

It's past history and can't be undone.

We broke it, we bought it.

We fixed it as best we could but left it on the shelf before the glue set at the direction of a "man" who who wanted the endeavor to fail from the outset.

We left it on the shelf under a Bush-negotiated timeline. The instability of the region lies at Bush's feet. Bottom line, we have no more troops coming home from Iraq in coffins (for no reason), and that's the way it should stay.


You still trying to use that excuse? Kind of pathetic even for you.


.
 
Bwahahahah! The Middle East is on fire. Obama bumbled foreign policy horribly. He helped to over throw dictators in Egypt and Libya and has attempted to do the same in Yemen and Syria. As a result, the Muslim Brotherhood now controls Egypt and all of it gave rise to ISIS.

By the way - more troops died under Barack Obama in Afghanistan than under George W. Bush.
Oops. Could you be any less informed about reality? Partisan hack.

Notice the liar's method: Word your lie delicately as if to create a false narrative where Obama fathered a more bloody foreign policy than Bush.

Throw the Iraq numbers in there, you lying piece of shit.
That's fine. Throws those numbers in. I believe more died in Iraq under George W. Bush than Barack Obama. And if you want to talk about Iraq, then do it. But it is a 100% fact that more troops died in Afghanistan under Barack Obama than did under George W. Bush.

Why do facts piss you off so much? Why do you lose your shit over reality?
 
Who cares? It's not our country. Never was. Even despite the Bush Doctrine of nation-building in an effort to bankrupt the U.S. at home.

Irrelevant.

It's past history and can't be undone.

We broke it, we bought it.

We fixed it as best we could but left it on the shelf before the glue set at the direction of a "man" who who wanted the endeavor to fail from the outset.

We left it on the shelf under a Bush-negotiated timeline. The instability of the region lies at Bush's feet. Bottom line, we have no more troops coming home from Iraq in coffins (for no reason), and that's the way it should stay.


You still trying to use that excuse? Kind of pathetic even for you.


.
There's nothing to excuse. We have fewer dead American soldiers thanks to Obama. Why do you hate the troops?
 
Bwahahahah! The Middle East is on fire. Obama bumbled foreign policy horribly. He helped to over throw dictators in Egypt and Libya and has attempted to do the same in Yemen and Syria. As a result, the Muslim Brotherhood now controls Egypt and all of it gave rise to ISIS.

By the way - more troops died under Barack Obama in Afghanistan than under George W. Bush.
Oops. Could you be any less informed about reality? Partisan hack.

Notice the liar's method: Word your lie delicately as if to create a false narrative where Obama fathered a more bloody foreign policy than Bush.

Throw the Iraq numbers in there, you lying piece of shit.
That's fine. Throws those numbers in. I believe more died in Iraq under George W. Bush than Barack Obama. And if you want to talk about Iraq, then do it. But it is a 100% fact that more troops died in Afghanistan under Barack Obama than did under George W. Bush.

Why do facts piss you off so much? Why do you lose your shit over reality?
More US soldiers died under Bush than Obama.


FACT.



Why do the facts scare you so much?
 
Remember when Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the rest of the Dumbocrats egregiously lied to the American people and said that the Affordable Healthcare Act would drastically reduce healthcare costs for the American people? The left continues to destroy America in their quest for power and control.

Record-High Health Care Spending Hits $3.2 Trillion in 2015

Health care costs have been increaing for decades . Boomers are getting older .

What's the GOP plan? Oh, do nothing .
Yeah. You'd be amazed at how costs decrease, efficiencies increase, and products/services improve when government stays the frick out of it and allows the free market do what it was designed to do.

By the way - stop making excuses. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the Dumbocrats all knew that the boomers were getting older and still they insisted that the failed Affordable Healthcare Act would cause prices to decrease. Instead, they've skyrocketed to record levels. You're a partisan hack without an honest bone in your body. You sound ridiculous trying to defend this stuff.
The cost curve is already bending down, despite not being fully implemented yet, dupe - THIS IS HOW MUCH HEALTH CARE ACTUALLY COSTS- no GOP scams anymore, guaranteed for EVERYONE, dupe.
 
After studying hundreds of years of history, conservatives have the solutions down to a science - while progressives continue to toil in catastrophic failure as they ignore reality in favor of ideology.

As Ronald Reagan stated - "weakness invites aggression". When Bill Clinton refused to deal with Al Qaeda and pulled out of Somalia at the first sign of a fight (like a coward), he convinced the world that America was cowardly. That emboldened the world. That coupled with failing to deal with Al Qaeda gave them the time and motivation to plan and execute 9/11. The mastermind of the attack - Khalid Sheik Mohammed - admitted that they were stunned by the response by the Bush Administration and that the Bush strategy prevented more attacks.

“Then he looked at me and said, ‘How was I supposed to know that cowboy George Bush would announce he wanted us ‘dead or alive’ and then invade Afghanistan to hunt us down?’” Mitchell writes.

“KSM explained that if the United States had treated 9/11 like a law enforcement matter, he would have had time to launch a second wave of attacks.” He was not able to do so because al-Qaeda was stunned “by the ferocity and swiftness of George W. Bush’s response.”

Had Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush been in office instead of Bill Clinton, 9/11 never happens. Weakness invites aggression. And the progressive idealistic weakness has invited unspeakable horrors against the U.S. It was done once again by Barack Obama - by making heavy cuts to our U.S. military (sending a signal to enemies) and by sending billions in ransom money to Iran.

A horrifying look into the mind of 9/11’s mastermind, in his own words
W was in office ferchrissake. And thanks for 9/11 thru sheer incompetence, the stupidest wars EVER, AND a corrupt GOP world depression and 8 years of mindless obstruction...CHANGE THE CHANNEL, superdupe.
 
Who cares? It's not our country. Never was. Even despite the Bush Doctrine of nation-building in an effort to bankrupt the U.S. at home.

Irrelevant.

It's past history and can't be undone.

We broke it, we bought it.

We fixed it as best we could but left it on the shelf before the glue set at the direction of a "man" who who wanted the endeavor to fail from the outset.

We left it on the shelf under a Bush-negotiated timeline. The instability of the region lies at Bush's feet. Bottom line, we have no more troops coming home from Iraq in coffins (for no reason), and that's the way it should stay.


You still trying to use that excuse? Kind of pathetic even for you.


.
There's nothing to excuse. We have fewer dead American soldiers thanks to Obama. Why do you hate the troops?

Obama caused a cluster fuck in the ME in case you didnt notice by calling a war over but not telling the other guy.

Just to win the white house.

So by your logic if we had surrendered to the Nazis it would be all fine and dandy with you if no more body bags?
 
Mod Note: OP topic was constrained to "showing weakness" thru policy and who does that. That's the topic. NOT each other. If you don't have something to share that ON topic -- don't post it..
 
I have no clue who the fuck you're talking about, you racist piece of shit. Kill yourself. Painfully.
Anyone else ever notice that progressives are uninformed, uneducated, unsophisticated, uncouth neanderthals? All of them act like junior high students. The next progressive I meet who was actually raised properly will literally be the first progressive I have ever met that was actually raised properly.

It's painfully clear that broken home = angry, entitled progressive

Oh I'm certain you don't travel outside of your own echo chamber.
 
This is how left-wing policy always ends: complete and total poverty and misery...

Apparently the top 10 states that voted for Hillary Clinton over President-elect Donald Trump during the 2016 election have a very disturbing commonality: they’re dying.

According to the Independent Journal Review, citing work by noted Washington Times columnist and economist Stephen Moore, those states are performing so poorly economically “people are clamoring to move out of them.”

Blue states that voted for Hillary Clinton share something in common: they’re dying
 
Even the EPA was finally forced to admit that fracking is completely safe (and because progressives live to rewrite history - it is important to note that this was the EPA under the control of Barack Obama).

Just think of the jobs, tax revenues, affordable energy, and wealth that could have been created over the past 8 years, during which Obama and the Dumbocrats obstructed progress out of their greed to grow the green energy sector that they are so heavily invested in.

EPA Finds No Widespread Water Pollution From Fracking
 

Forum List

Back
Top