Discussion in 'Politics' started by TheOne, Aug 2, 2004.
The hits just keep on coming...
12 Anti Bush threads started in less 2 hours: $1.00
Quoting slanted news sources: $.12
Constantly refering to "un-named officials" $.14
Being a KoolAde drinking Troll: Priceless
:teeth: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
You could also find a lot of people like that who are for Bush. He wants to make it seem like Bush-supporters are a bunch of far-right wackos, but then he complains about Republicans doing the same. Hmmmmmmmm.
I don't give a shit what they said. They were disgruntled and had books coming out. A lot of the stuff in them contradicted stuff they had said earlier.
Since the Senate and the House had access to this information about how the experts were skeptical, then they should have voted against the war. It also has been proven that Iraq had plenty of ties to terrorism. I know people will point to the BS headline about how there were no links to al Qaeda, but what else can you expect from the NYT.
Of course, the media kept talking about this over and over and said little about what Saddam's regime did and the beheadings. And even when they did mention the beheadings, they would usually mention Abu Ghraib as their motivation as if that justified it.
And Kerry has? I don't even think that's right anyway.
Again, and Kerry has? Hell, he and his wife could just buy the hospital.
Actually, the tax cuts helped many people. The much-maligned $200,000+ earners include many small business owners (yeah, those jerks. Jerks who hire millions of people).
I guess he also does not care about Kerry's lies about how horrible the economy is. He created his own misery index because the one they usually use would show that things are too good (sad when good economic news is considered bad news, but that's how it is with the Democrats).
He just described the Clinton administration.
They get threat warnings every day. Also, it's not like these warnings he speaks of mention specific targets and specific dates. I really don't know how they could have used this to prevent 9/11.
What's his solution for these two things? Does he think the government needs to take care of this for everyone? I could see how some people would need it, but many other people don't and they receive it anyway.
Kerry has a lot of money. So does Soros. What about all those rich celebs for Kerry?
Speaking of junk science, what about those embryonic stem cells? He makes it seem like we are "this close" to being able to cure every disease known to man with embryonic stem cells. We are not "this close" and he never mentions much about adult stem cells, which have shown a lot of promise..
Yeah, we should protect the right to stab babies in the head and suck their brains out
As I've said before, the Senate and the House had access to the same intelligence and they voted for war.
Again, he's describing Kerry.
So now the Supreme Court is right wing? What a joke. Liberals say they are on their side when they make a decision that they like, but when they don't, they are right wingers.
Who are you describing? I know it's not Kerry.
That's a great attitude to have. Vote on someone because of who they are not rather than who they are.
My you're on a roll today!
Good to have you here, TheOne
Welcome AZ LIB
Who are you referring to, Ron Reagan?
Separate names with a comma.