The Capitalist Core: 1380 Corporations

"A new report from the anti-poverty group Oxfam has helped put inequality back near the top of the global agenda, just in time for the World Economic Forum’s annual gathering of global elites in Davos, Switzerland. In particular, one striking claim from the Oxfam report has generated headlines: By next year, the top 1% of the world’s population could own more wealth than the other 99%. The Oxfam report – just one of many attempts at measuring worldwide economic disparities – fits into a broader pattern of growing interest in, and concern about, inequality."
Inequality is at top of the agenda as global elites gather in Davos Pew Research Center

make liberalsim illegal and you make inequality illegal.
 
"'World-system' refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries.[2]

"Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials.[3]

"This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries.[3]

"Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time.[3]

"For a time, some countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States of America.[3]"
World-systems theory - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
"'World-system' refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries.[2]

"Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials.[3]

"This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries.[3]

"Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time.[3]

"For a time, some countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States of America.[3]"
World-systems theory - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
make liberalsim illegal and you make inequality illegal.
 
make liberalsim illegal and you make inequality illegal.
Outlaw capitalism.
"As a response to the failure of the feudal system, Europe embraced the capitalist system.[5]Europeans were motivated to develop technology to explore and trade around the world, using their superior military to take control of the trade routes.[3]

"Europeans exploited their initial small advantages, which led to an accelerating process of accumulation of wealth and power in Europe.[3]

"Wallerstein notes that never before had an economic system encompassed that much of the world, with trade links crossing so many political boundaries.[5]

"In the past, geographically large economic systems existed, but were mostly limited to spheres of domination of large empires (such as theRoman Empire); development of the capitalism enabled the world economy to extend beyond individual states.[5] International division of labor was crucial in deciding what relationships exists between different regions, their labor conditions and political systems.[5]

"For classification and comparison purposes, Wallerstein introduced the categories of core, semi-periphery, periphery, and external countries.[5] Cores monopolized the capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world could only provide labor and raw resources.[3] The resulting inequality reinforced existing unequal development.[3]"
World-systems theory - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
make liberalsim illegal and you make inequality illegal.
Outlaw capitalism.
"As a response to the failure of the feudal system, Europe embraced the capitalist system.[5]Europeans were motivated to develop technology to explore and trade around the world, using their superior military to take control of the trade routes.[3]

"Europeans exploited their initial small advantages, which led to an accelerating process of accumulation of wealth and power in Europe.[3]

"Wallerstein notes that never before had an economic system encompassed that much of the world, with trade links crossing so many political boundaries.[5]

"In the past, geographically large economic systems existed, but were mostly limited to spheres of domination of large empires (such as theRoman Empire); development of the capitalism enabled the world economy to extend beyond individual states.[5] International division of labor was crucial in deciding what relationships exists between different regions, their labor conditions and political systems.[5]

"For classification and comparison purposes, Wallerstein introduced the categories of core, semi-periphery, periphery, and external countries.[5] Cores monopolized the capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world could only provide labor and raw resources.[3] The resulting inequality reinforced existing unequal development.[3]"
World-systems theory - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

dear, capitalism just eliminated 40% of the world's poverty in China . Do you like to see people slowly starving to death? Answer question or admit you lack IQ to be here.
 
dear, capitalism just eliminated 40% of the world's poverty in China . Do you like to see people slowly starving to death? Answer question or admit you lack IQ to be here.
Would you like to live in China?
openingremarks27__01inline__4051.jpg

Slave.
 
does the idiot mean China today or China under the liberalism that slowly starved 60 million to death??
Either one, Fascist.

dear, virtually 100% of Chinese would rather live in todays China where people are getting rich rather than in liberal China where 60 million slowly starved to death.

Do you understand that getting rich is better than slowly starving to death? See why we say stupid? Is any other conclusion possible
 
dear, virtually 100% of Chinese would rather live in todays China where people are getting rich rather than in liberal China where 60 million slowly starved to death.

Do you understand that getting rich is better than slowly starving to death? See why we say stupid? Is any other conclusion possible
Depends on how important breathing is:
China-Pollution.JPEG-0bfec-555x370.jpg

 
submoron liberal still does not know we don't take reading assignment from submoron liberals who are too stupid to do anything but cut and paste
"The world's most populous nation and soon-to-be largest economy is rapidly turning into the planet's most efficient assassin. Unscrupulous Chinese entrepreneurs are flooding world markets with lethal products. China's perverse form of capitalism combines illegal mercantilist and protectionist weapons to pick off American industries, job by job. China's emboldened military is..."
Why do simplistic neo-con fascists hate America?
Amazon.com Death by China Confronting the Dragon - A Global Call to Action 9780132180238 Peter W. Navarro Greg Autry Books
 

Forum List

Back
Top