The biggest Nationalist event Polish Independence day.

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Despite the U.S.A having about 9 X more people than Poland.

How come the U.S can't form such a huge Nationalist event?

It seems the Polish are inherently far more Nationalist than the Americans are.

I am proud of Polish people.

How about you?

me Too, Poles know how to treat the Mongols of Juchi (who actually tried to pull off Crimea N1 in Warsaw, under Putler´s FSB command ) but Poles know what to do)))

Good sleep a mongol ,LOL))

remember killing in Praga , boom boom Muscovites

Nice job , my polish brothers

Why are you posting pictures of football hooligans? WTF?!

Well a lot of the Hooligans especially in Central - East Europe are Nationalists.

I have many Polish friends I was with two today we had lunch, they support Legia Warsaw.

The situation we have now I think we trust to go with Poland and the Patriotic Polish Government of Law and Justice, it upsets me to comment we do not trust or have anything in common with the self hating German Government of self haters who desire to make the nation into the dumping ground for any Third World slug that goes to squat there, you do not piss on your own peoples and want to destroy everything your Ancestors protected to charge future generations with also protecting.

Well, politically at least today, I think Austria has much more in common with Poland, Hungary, Czech Rep, and Slovakia rather than Germany.

 

[Litwin]

....

You sound like a true paid NATO propagandist.

Yes I am a proud NATO propagandist, and you know you Mongols of Juchi have 0 chance where NATO has its foot...you bunch of cowards, who lost all wars and pay to the Chechen war - contribution every year . LOL

If Russia isn't a threat, then what's the purpose of NATO still existing?

What is the maximal IQ to ask this question with?

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

 

[Litwin]

i got you
View attachment 160727

"
The Internet Research Agency (IRA), known in Russian Internet slang as the Trolls from Olgino, is a Russian company, based in Saint Petersburg, that engages in online influence operations on behalf of the Russian government. The agency has employed fake accounts registered on major social networks, discussion boards, online newspaper sites, and video hosting services in order to promote the Kremlin's interests in domestic policy, Ukraine, and the Middle East, as well as attempting to influence the 2016 United States presidential election to support the candidacy of Donald Trump.[citation needed]

The extent to which the Russian government tried to influence public opinion using social media became widely known after a June 2014 BuzzFeed article greatly expanded on government documents published by hackers earlier that year.[2] The IRA gained worldwide media attention by June 2015, when one of its offices was reported as having data from fake accounts used for biased Internet trolling. Subsequently, there were news reports of individuals receiving monetary compensation for performing these tasks.[1]
According to journalists’ investigations, the office in Olgino was named as Internet Research Agency Ltd. (Russian: ООО «Агентство интернет-исследований»).[3][8] The company was founded in the summer of 2013.[6]

Journalists also point out that Alexey Soskovets, who had participated in Russian youth political community, was directly connected to the office in Olgino. His company, North-Western Service Agency, won 17 or 18 (according to different sources) contracts for organizing celebrations, forums and sport competitions for authorities of Saint Petersburg. The agency was the only participant in half of those bids. In the summer of 2013 the agency won a tender for providing freight services for participants of Seliger camp.[3][9]

In 2014, according to Russian media, Internet Research Ltd. (Russian: ООО «Интернет исследования»), founded in March 2014, joined the agency's activity. Novaya Gazeta newspaper claim this company to be a successor of Internet Research Agency Ltd.[10] Internet Research Ltd. is considered to be linked to Yevgeny Prigozhin, head of the holding company Concord. The "Trolls of Olgino" from Saint Petersburg are considered to be his project. As of October 2014, the company belonged to Mikhail Bystrov, who had been the head of the police station at Moscow district of Saint Petersburg.[11]

Russian media point out that according to documents, published by hackers from Anonymous International, Concord is directly involved with trolling administration through the agency. Researchers cite e-mail correspondence, in which Concord gives instructions to trolls and receives reports on accomplished work.[5] According to journalists' information, Concord organized banquets in Kremlin and also cooperated with Voentorg and the Russian Ministry of Defence.[12]

Despite links to Alexei Soskovets, Nadejda Orlova, deputy head of the Committee for Youth Policy in Saint Petersburg, disputed connection between her institution and the trolling offices.[3]

Finnish journalist Jessikka Aro, who extensively reported on the pro-Russian trolling activities in Finland, was in response targeted by an organized campaign of hate, disinformation and harassment.[13][14][15]"

....

You sound like a true paid NATO propagandist.

Yes I am a proud NATO propagandist, and you know you Mongols of Juchi have 0 chance where NATO has its foot...you bunch of cowards, who lost all wars and pay to the Chechen war - contribution every year . LOL

If Russia isn't a threat, then what's the purpose of NATO still existing?

What is the maximal IQ to ask this question with?

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

and Its already in Ukraine and Georgia ,) that's why the Mongols are only losing land there )) and its just beginning , Belarus, Moldova, Caucasus, etc.)))

 

[Bleipriester]

Yes I am a proud NATO propagandist, and you know you Mongols of Juchi have 0 chance where NATO has its foot...you bunch of cowards, who lost all wars and pay to the Chechen war - contribution every year . LOL

If Russia isn't a threat, then what's the purpose of NATO still existing?

What is the maximal IQ to ask this question with?

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

 

[Litwin]

If Russia isn't a threat, then what's the purpose of NATO still existing?

What is the maximal IQ to ask this question with?

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

What is the maximal IQ to ask this question with?

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

^^^^ This:

 

[Litwin]

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

^^^^ This:

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

If Russia isn't a threat, then what's the purpose of NATO still existing?

What is the maximal IQ to ask this question with?

Well, if there is no threat for NATO to exist by, then it seems like NATO exists for more along the lines of global domination.

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

Litwin is already in the mad house going from the things he posts not just in this thread but in all threads.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

^^^^ This:

^^^^ Litwin posts the above to illustrate my comment in post # 108 about him being in the mad house

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

You got it. NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is not an alliance at all anymore but a hegemony structure.

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

^^^^ This:

Okay Litwin darling WTF is this you have posted?

 

[Litwin]

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

^^^^ This:

Okay Litwin darling WTF is this you have posted?

its an instruction how to make very own Pynia at home , very useful and nice present for all Putlerists here.

 

[Litwin]

yes Olgino - Troll NATO is "hegemony structure." of the civilization. dont like it ? buy a ticket to Zimbabwe, Chechnya or Omsk . safe places from NATO

You mean your hooligan civilization, hypocrite? By a ticket to the mad house.

law , and order, you Muscovite guys are the thugs .... ...

"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". The non-binding resolution, which was supported by 100 United Nations member states, affirmed the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum. Eleven nations voted against the resolution, while 58 abstained, and a further 24 states were absent when the vote took place.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto[2] of draft resolution S/2014/189,[3] sponsored by 42 countries.

The UN General Assembly also passed the related Resolution 71/205 in December 2016, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)".[4]"

^^^^ This:

^^^^ Litwin posts the above to illustrate my comment in post # 108 about him being in the mad house

ps more of pynia Pynia (Vovka Putin)