The Big Republican Lie on Tax Cuts

I'm still waiting for an explanation of how taking more and more of people's money helps the economy.
It's not about helping the economy...It's about knocking the eeeeevil wealthy down a few pegs.

It's no more complicated than pure, unvarnished envy and covetousness.

Bullshit DUDe oddballs...it about lowering our debt without cutting programs that benefit We, the People. Please tell me how the Clinton era tax rates ruined the economy?

Reaganomics is nothing more than a new way of packaging an aristocracy. And THAT is exactly what it turned out to be. You better go back and read Hayek because Reaganomics was central planning.
 
So if higher, 90% taxes are the key to prosperity why don't Democrat ever run on that platform?

Why?

Andy Cuomo is a shoe in in NY and he's running on no new taxes? Seriously, what the fucking fuck?

Why keep New Yorkers is such dire straights by not raising taxes to 90%?

Why are Progressives always so dishonest?
 
I'm still waiting for an explanation of how taking more and more of people's money helps the economy.
It's not about helping the economy...It's about knocking the eeeeevil wealthy down a few pegs.

It's no more complicated than pure, unvarnished envy and covetousness.

Bullshit DUDe oddballs...it about lowering our debt without cutting programs that benefit We, the People. Please tell me how the Clinton era tax rates ruined the economy?

Reaganomics is nothing more than a new way of packaging an aristocracy. And THAT is exactly what it turned out to be. You better go back and read Hayek because Reaganomics was central planning.
Nobody said anything about Reagan or Bubba, Jethro....Not even Reagan got around to the real solution, which is cutting spending...A solution that covetous, foaming-at-the-mouth socialist dweebs like you refuse to ever consider.
 
Reagan? I just wanted to know how people having less money to spend was regarded as such a great thing.
 
I'm still waiting for an explanation of how taking more and more of people's money helps the economy.
It's not about helping the economy...It's about knocking the eeeeevil wealthy down a few pegs.

It's no more complicated than pure, unvarnished envy and covetousness.

Bullshit DUDe oddballs...it about lowering our debt without cutting programs that benefit We, the People. Please tell me how the Clinton era tax rates ruined the economy?

Reaganomics is nothing more than a new way of packaging an aristocracy. And THAT is exactly what it turned out to be. You better go back and read Hayek because Reaganomics was central planning.

I hope you didn't spend too much time on this answer....
 
It's not about helping the economy...It's about knocking the eeeeevil wealthy down a few pegs.

It's no more complicated than pure, unvarnished envy and covetousness.

Bullshit DUDe oddballs...it about lowering our debt without cutting programs that benefit We, the People. Please tell me how the Clinton era tax rates ruined the economy?

Reaganomics is nothing more than a new way of packaging an aristocracy. And THAT is exactly what it turned out to be. You better go back and read Hayek because Reaganomics was central planning.
Nobody said anything about Reagan or Bubba, Jethro....Not even Reagan got around to the real solution, which is cutting spending...A solution that covetous, foaming-at-the-mouth socialist dweebs like you refuse to ever consider.

Cutting WHAT spending?
 
Bullshit DUDe oddballs...it about lowering our debt without cutting programs that benefit We, the People. Please tell me how the Clinton era tax rates ruined the economy?

Reaganomics is nothing more than a new way of packaging an aristocracy. And THAT is exactly what it turned out to be. You better go back and read Hayek because Reaganomics was central planning.
Nobody said anything about Reagan or Bubba, Jethro....Not even Reagan got around to the real solution, which is cutting spending...A solution that covetous, foaming-at-the-mouth socialist dweebs like you refuse to ever consider.

Cutting WHAT spending?

You know, you're right... spending is right on target. It's an inadequate taxation issue. Thanks.
 
I don't see lower tax rates helping this depression, so do they hurt? Well, only if we can afford to pay a billion a day interest on the debt. This discussion seems to run along the lines of America being in the box, and that ain't so. The weathly aren't investing in America or creating jobs here. However the consumer is buying here, so who should get the tax cut, and who should pay higher tax rates?

I am all for tax cuts and incentives for companies and individuals that create jobs here. But the ones that outsource jobs to 3rd world countries, tax the living shit out of them. I would go even farther...charge them extra fees for water, sewer, utilities, roads, fire and police protection for their corporate offices. If they don't like it, they can go live in the squalor their 3rd world wages support.

Why should we allow outsourcing at all in America? Either hire America workers, or leave. I recall Canada pitching fit when Americans said buy only American products as one means of stimulating the economy. Maybe it was over pharmaceuticals. I thought, what gall those people have to think we should sink for them.

Because America claims to be a free country.
 
:lol: cutting WHAT spending? :lol:

He favors cutting any spending that doesn't directly benefit him....just like most Americans

Coming from a guy who constantly clamors for more of other people's money, well, enough said.

Typical lefty, we never spend too much, we just don't tax enough.

Actually, it comes down to both

If you cut taxes without cutting spending the deficit soars
If you only want to look at spending without impacting taxes, you have to cut twice as much

To borrow money to pay for tax cuts is lunacy
 
He favors cutting any spending that doesn't directly benefit him....just like most Americans

Coming from a guy who constantly clamors for more of other people's money, well, enough said.

Typical lefty, we never spend too much, we just don't tax enough.

Actually, it comes down to both

If you cut taxes without cutting spending the deficit soars
If you only want to look at spending without impacting taxes, you have to cut twice as much

To borrow money to pay for tax cuts is lunacy

Actually, we borrowed money to pay for spending. Nobody borrows money to pay for reduced income, that's nonsense.

Income can and will increase under reduced taxation. But, if you jack up spending at a faster rate than income is increasing, well, here we are. You are not going to become prosperous by taking 40% - 50% out of the private sector. Ain't gonna happen. The pubic sector produces nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top