Mini 14
Senior Member
- Jun 6, 2010
- 3,947
- 583
- 48
Well other than some historical stuff and who beget who stuff the bible is an error.
or at least it cannot be proven to be true.
Can it be proven to be false?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well other than some historical stuff and who beget who stuff the bible is an error.
or at least it cannot be proven to be true.
The creation story is an error. We know from paleontology, biology and geology that the earth was not formed as described and that new species appearred millions of years apart.
The creation story is an error. We know from paleontology, biology and geology that the earth was not formed as described and that new species appearred millions of years apart.
Actually, all those branches of science fully support the Biblical account, as explained here.
Those of you who affirmatively accept God as a commander of genocide mistake God and your relation to Him and the Bible itself.
Those of you who affirmatively accept God as a commander of genocide mistake God and your relation to Him and the Bible itself.
Could you please repeat this in English so that a rational person might have a chance to respond?
I think its funny how Christians can say, "Well youve taken it out of context, thats not what it means at all." but when it comes to persecuting Muslims..........
Those of you who affirmatively accept God as a commander of genocide mistake God and your relation to Him and the Bible itself.
Could you please repeat this in English so that a rational person might have a chance to respond?
God did tell the Israelites to kill all the inhabitants of Canaan.
Well other than some historical stuff and who beget who stuff the bible is an error.
or at least it cannot be proven to be true.
Seriously, US, all you do is prove that you are not terribly bright.
Well other than some historical stuff and who beget who stuff the bible is an error.
or at least it cannot be proven to be true.
Seriously, US, all you do is prove that you are not terribly bright.
One does not have to be terribly bright to spot the contradictions in the bible.
And if one part is wrong, who is to say any of it is correct?
The creation story is an error. We know from paleontology, biology and geology that the earth was not formed as described and that new species appearred millions of years apart.
Actually, all those branches of science fully support the Biblical account, as explained here.
Don't have time to read the whole site. How about citing specific pages? Past experience with creationist arguments tells me that the real science is buried under misinformation, falsehoods and petty quibbling. If you know the topic well, you should be able to provide us with a better cite than that.
Could you please repeat this in English so that a rational person might have a chance to respond?
God did tell the Israelites to kill all the inhabitants of Canaan.
Short answer, no.
Seriously, US, all you do is prove that you are not terribly bright.
One does not have to be terribly bright to spot the contradictions in the bible.
And if one part is wrong, who is to say any of it is correct?
Does that mean that if I find errors in science texts I can throw all science out?
Actually, all those branches of science fully support the Biblical account, as explained here.
Don't have time to read the whole site. How about citing specific pages? Past experience with creationist arguments tells me that the real science is buried under misinformation, falsehoods and petty quibbling. If you know the topic well, you should be able to provide us with a better cite than that.
If all creation arguments are nothing more than misinformation and petty quibbling, you shouldn't need me to pick a specific page for you. All you would have to do would be pick one at random and you could easily debunk it.
Don't have time to read the whole site. How about citing specific pages? Past experience with creationist arguments tells me that the real science is buried under misinformation, falsehoods and petty quibbling. If you know the topic well, you should be able to provide us with a better cite than that.
If all creation arguments are nothing more than misinformation and petty quibbling, you shouldn't need me to pick a specific page for you. All you would have to do would be pick one at random and you could easily debunk it.
Evolution- there are mountains of evidence for evolution.
The Big Bang is a theory. At this time what caused the Big Bang is speculation. Theres a lot we dont know, fathom, or understand about the universe. Kind of like when we once believed the world was flat.
Human evolution, well we all have some neanderthal in us according to recent studies.
Study: Neanderthal DNA Lives On in Modern Humans - TIME
Neanderthals, Humans Interbred
Neanderthal: 99.5 Percent Human | LiveScience
The one page I did look at said-
"Atheism vs. theism is sometimes misrepresented as science vs. faith. This is untrue because evolution is a worldview that is also based on faith."
Lets say it this way: Atheism vs. theism is more like observation vs. hope.
Say there are two companies that are competing to make the fastest train ever made on earth. One company is called Scientofia the other the W.W.J.D. Corporation.
Scientofia uses theory and calculations and tests to come up with a design they consider to be the best vehicle to withstand the rigorous stress it would under go during travel.
W.W.J.D. Corp. uses hope and faith.
Which would you ride with?
One is a failed example of a realistic world application. Its great for a religious belief but not for real world applications.
If all creation arguments are nothing more than misinformation and petty quibbling, you shouldn't need me to pick a specific page for you. All you would have to do would be pick one at random and you could easily debunk it.
Evolution- there are mountains of evidence for evolution.
The Big Bang is a theory. At this time what caused the Big Bang is speculation. Theres a lot we dont know, fathom, or understand about the universe. Kind of like when we once believed the world was flat.
Human evolution, well we all have some neanderthal in us according to recent studies.
Study: Neanderthal DNA Lives On in Modern Humans - TIME
Neanderthals, Humans Interbred
Neanderthal: 99.5 Percent Human | LiveScience
The one page I did look at said-
"Atheism vs. theism is sometimes misrepresented as science vs. faith. This is untrue because evolution is a worldview that is also based on faith."
Lets say it this way: Atheism vs. theism is more like observation vs. hope.
Say there are two companies that are competing to make the fastest train ever made on earth. One company is called Scientofia the other the W.W.J.D. Corporation.
Scientofia uses theory and calculations and tests to come up with a design they consider to be the best vehicle to withstand the rigorous stress it would under go during travel.
W.W.J.D. Corp. uses hope and faith.
Which would you ride with?
One is a failed example of a realistic world application. Its great for a religious belief but not for real world applications.
The Big Bang is a theory....God spoke and BAG it happened!
The problem with the 'big bang' theory is that it states that all matter was bunched up so tight that it caused an explosion. Where did all that matter come from? It had to be created some how.