The Bible and Homosexuality

jwoodie

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2012
19,341
8,103
940
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?
 
men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).
Lol that’s so dumb. But anyways, glad the magic book is fine with hawt lesbian action

What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinion of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman. And the logic gap grows even in case of heterosexuals. Sometimes is in this case analsex only an extremely brutal attack against the will of women.

 
Last edited:
men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).
Lol that’s so dumb. But anyways, glad the magic book is fine with hawt lesbian action

What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinoins of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous - also under heterosexuals. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman.


You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.
 
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?
The Bible does reference homosexuality.

Even in your OP you acknowledge that.

So you're fighting against your own premise.
 
men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).
Lol that’s so dumb. But anyways, glad the magic book is fine with hawt lesbian action

What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinoins of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous - also under heterosexuals. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman.


You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.


What's wrong in case of viral infections. And in general will always exist rules for sexual behavior. In case of Christians I'm able to say it is clear that Christians - and I guess all other spiritual people too - should try to avoid analsex. An anus is part of the gastrointestinal tract. Analsex is dangerous and analsex is without any logic - as well under homosexual men, where analsex simulates a woman - and also under heterosexuals, where analsex is often only an oppression of women or violence against women.

 
Last edited:
men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).
Lol that’s so dumb. But anyways, glad the magic book is fine with hawt lesbian action

What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinoins of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous - also under heterosexuals. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman.


You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.


What's wrong in case of viral infections. And in general will always exist rules for sexual behavior. In case of Christains I say it is clear that Christians - and I guess all other spiritual people too - should try to avoid analsex. An anus is part of the gastrointestinal tract. Analsex is dangerous and without any logic.

What about oral sex and edging?
 
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?
The Bible does reference homosexuality. ...

Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.

 
Last edited:
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?
The Bible does reference homosexuality. ...

Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine
 
men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).
Lol that’s so dumb. But anyways, glad the magic book is fine with hawt lesbian action

What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinoins of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous - also under heterosexuals. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman.


You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.


What's wrong in case of viral infections. And in general will always exist rules for sexual behavior. In case of Christains I say it is clear that Christians - and I guess all other spiritual people too - should try to avoid analsex. An anus is part of the gastrointestinal tract. Analsex is dangerous and without any logic.

What about oral sex and edging?


Never thought about. What is edging?
 
Lol that’s so dumb. But anyways, glad the magic book is fine with hawt lesbian action

What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinoins of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous - also under heterosexuals. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman.


You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.


What's wrong in case of viral infections. And in general will always exist rules for sexual behavior. In case of Christains I say it is clear that Christians - and I guess all other spiritual people too - should try to avoid analsex. An anus is part of the gastrointestinal tract. Analsex is dangerous and without any logic.

What about oral sex and edging?


Never thought about. What is edging?

Stopping sex right as you approach climax to prevent it, then doing it again and again
 
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?
The Bible does reference homosexuality. ...

Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine

It seems to me you have a problem. What is your problem?
 
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?

The word homosexual never existed before 1868. Sorta hard for it to appear in the Bible
 
Nowhere in the Bible is there any reference to Homosexuality, let alone any of its currently popular euphemisms (LGBTQ, etc.). However. it does contain prohibitions against men "laying" together (i.e., anal intercourse).

Many religious prohibitions are based on practical health considerations, and anal intercourse is no exception. It hardly needs any further explanation than to say that this practice promotes disease and physical injury.

The conflation of this practice with issues of gender identity and personal preferences has been used to attack the Bible and its believers. Maybe it's time to clarify exactly what the Bible is talking about?
The Bible does reference homosexuality. ...

Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine

It seems to me you have a problem. What is your problem? What's in your head is not the hub of the world.
You seem to be suggesting that if everyone lived inside my head then I would have no problems
 
What exactly do you say with this words? Christians are idiots or Christians are enemies of all homosexual people? Or is it: I use drugs whenever I like to use drugs completely independent from any opinoins of one of the three magic kings of wisdom?

Analsex is not only dangerous - also under heterosexuals. Analsex under homosexual male men is also without any logic, because analsex substitutes in this case sex with a woman.


You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.


What's wrong in case of viral infections. And in general will always exist rules for sexual behavior. In case of Christains I say it is clear that Christians - and I guess all other spiritual people too - should try to avoid analsex. An anus is part of the gastrointestinal tract. Analsex is dangerous and without any logic.

What about oral sex and edging?


Never thought about. What is edging?

Stopping sex right as you approach climax to prevent it, then doing it again and again


Is something wrong with your brain? Do you use drugs? .. Okay got it. Edging seems to be a technique for a better form of orgasm, whatever this could be.
 
Last edited:
You can go ahead and have anal sex with a man or woman if you want. Doesn’t affect me or anyone else in the slightest.

What's wrong in case of viral infections. And in general will always exist rules for sexual behavior. In case of Christains I say it is clear that Christians - and I guess all other spiritual people too - should try to avoid analsex. An anus is part of the gastrointestinal tract. Analsex is dangerous and without any logic.
What about oral sex and edging?

Never thought about. What is edging?
Stopping sex right as you approach climax to prevent it, then doing it again and again

Is something wrong with your brain? Do you use drugs?
Maybe I should. It could help me believe in your fantastical, magical world.
 
The Bible does reference homosexuality. ...

Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine

It seems to me you have a problem. What is your problem? What's in your head is not the hub of the world.
You seem to be suggesting that if everyone lived inside my head then I would have no problems

What is your problem?
People that are gay being attacked for existing
 
Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine

It seems to me you have a problem. What is your problem? What's in your head is not the hub of the world.
You seem to be suggesting that if everyone lived inside my head then I would have no problems

What is your problem?
People that are gay being attacked for existing

6000 years ago I had executed someone who is a homosexual man and has analsex with another man. 40 years ago I was surprised, why a homosexual man liked to rape a woman - what he did not do, because he spoke with psychologists about his problems. ... Oh --- and another homosexual man was for some long years my boss. He died young. This was not my fault. We never had any problem with each other.

 
Last edited:
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine

It seems to me you have a problem. What is your problem? What's in your head is not the hub of the world.
You seem to be suggesting that if everyone lived inside my head then I would have no problems

What is your problem?
People that are gay being attacked for existing

6000 years ago I had executed someone who is a homosexual man and has analsex with another man. 40 years ago I was sureprisied why a homosexual man liked to rape a woman - what he did not do because he spoke with psychologists about his problems. ... Oh --- and another homosexual man was some years long my boss. He died young, what was not my fault.
The madness always exposes itself
 
Not really. "Homosexuality" is an expression from Karl Maria Kertbeny of the year 1868. The bible knows male and female sexuality with male and female partners and has different rules. For homosexual women for example I remember in the moment not any rule. And the eldest law in context male homosexuality was death penalty - what's by the way easily understandable for very little communities in this time of history, when nearly not any possibility had existed to be able help in case of deadly virus-infections.
It should be no surprise to anybody that when a bunch of horny dudes got together to write their magic book they made sure to leave in that women having sex with each other is perfectly fine

It seems to me you have a problem. What is your problem? What's in your head is not the hub of the world.
You seem to be suggesting that if everyone lived inside my head then I would have no problems

What is your problem?
People that are gay being attacked for existing

There's laws against attacking people for existing, no matter whether they crave dick or not. Laws put on the books by white men who like vaginas.
 

Forum List

Back
Top