The Best Lay Gets The Job

You are offensive, not funny.
To OldLady: Lighten up.

You are as dumb as dishwater if you think getting ahead on television is any different than it was in the Hollywood Studio era.

NOTE: Bum lays and bow-wows complained the loudest because they never stood a chance.

Going about their business in a professional manner is still the tried and true couch test for ambitious beauties irrespective of the occasional sexual harassment law suit.

Being a gifted French girl never hurt either. Where a lady took it in Hollywood was up to her and still is. The same is true in television.
 
You are offensive, not funny.
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Kosher Girl.......? :dunno:
You are offensive, not funny.
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Kosher Girl.......? :dunno:
Kimberly Guilfoyle
 
You are offensive, not funny.
To OldLady: Lighten up.

You are as dumb as dishwater if you think getting ahead on television is any different than it was in the Hollywood Studio era.

NOTE: Bum lays and bow-wows complained the loudest because they never stood a chance.

Going about their business in a professional manner is still the tried and true couch test for ambitious beauties irrespective of the occasional sexual harassment law suit.

Being a gifted French girl never hurt either. Where a lady took it in Hollywood was up to her and still is. The same is true in television.
If you put your thread in the Badlands where it belongs, I never would have said a word.
Donald, is that you?
 
You are offensive, not funny.
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Kosher Girl.......? :dunno:
You are offensive, not funny.
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Kosher Girl.......? :dunno:
Kimberly Guilfoyle
Funny bone in a sling this morning? :D
 
If you put your thread in the Badlands where it belongs, I never would have said a word.
To OldLady: It was meant as humor. You did not see it because you are naive in addition to being stupid. If you want to turn my thread into a serious discussion try this:

Women have performed sex for money in every country and culture since the beginning of time. The money today’s top call girls earn every year is peanuts compared to what an ambitious woman can earn by getting ahead in a major industry. This is why you are naive:


Beauty commands a higher price in every field where sex is sold ——— from high-priced call girls to streetwalkers.​



When the girls compete in an institution like a bar or a cathouse you will find Stella by Starlight on the payroll. Stella is only trotted out if a prospective buyer refuses to pay for the charms offered by lesser lights. Even in those tart shops where all of the working girls possess physical beauty there is a Stella in attendance who shines just a little brighter than her sisters. Stella is like the shiniest used car on the lot; she may not perform all that well, but she still commands the highest price.

Sales techniques in almost every field are predicated on the Stella by Starlight Principle. Of course there are some areas where Stella is not required. For example: One does not buy a pill because it is more beautiful than all of the other pills; nevertheless, beauty (packaging) is a sales aid in most realms of commerce. Beautiful women sell cosmetics to plain Janes, not the other way around. Magazine publishers feature young men and women of beautiful face and form in order to sell their magazines. Such mags would not attempt to sell their publications by featuring unbecoming subjects in various stages of undress.

In effect, Socialism denies the existence of physical beauty. At the very least, Socialism denies the value of beauty when it comes to selling. That explains the drab, unattractive, world that Socialists/Communists have in store for everyone except themselves. Socialism is driven by envy; so it is not unreasonable to say that influential Socialists get sick with envy at the thought of a beautiful woman screwing a working class nobody.

Socialist moralists are not against prostitution as they claim, but they are against beautiful women having the Right to choose their partners in sex.

Socialism’s sick insistence that inner-beauty is the only beauty is evident in almost every touchy-feely issue that Socialists promote. By denying physical beauty its due it then becomes easier for Socialists to denounce excellence in everything else.

Pussy For Hillary Is A Bridge Too Far
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Incidentally, see permalink #14 in this thread for humor involving K.G.

Two Looking Good Ladies
 
You are offensive, not funny.
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Kosher Girl.......? :dunno:
You are offensive, not funny.
I hope K.G. gets it, but I'll miss her on The Five.
Kosher Girl.......? :dunno:
Kimberly Guilfoyle
Funny bone in a sling this morning? :D
NO!
 
The fact that all of these five contenders are intelligent, capable women and you are doubling down on your notion that their ability to fuck good is all that will decide their "worth" is demeaning. There is nothing at all amusing about that. Women are not just walking screw objects, and I don't see a whole lot of folks crowding in to chuckle over it. Is Trump's assurance that his dick isn't tiny what got him elected?
 
I thought the OP was funny. However, I do see how it could be demeaning. But if everyone looked at innocent jokes in that matter, this would be one dull world.
 
The fact that all of these five contenders are intelligent, capable women and you are doubling down on your notion that their ability to fuck good is all that will decide their "worth" is demeaning. There is nothing at all amusing about that. Women are not just walking screw objects, and I don't see a whole lot of folks crowding in to chuckle over it. Is Trump's assurance that his dick isn't tiny what got him elected?
He had to give up the fanny when he wanted to be a broadcaster...That's how he knows so much about the industry...
 
The fact that all of these five contenders are intelligent, capable women
To Oldlady: You ignored the critical element in my premise —— AMBITION.

Rhetorical question: Do you understand the distinction between ambition and achievement?

their ability to fuck good is all that will decide their "worth" is demeaning.
To OldLady: Gratifying unbridled ambition at any cost demeans women and men in every institutional setting. And please do not tell me that asking questions formulated in a staff meeting is achievement.

Returning to Megyn Kelly when she was the queen of FOX female anchors. The questions she NEVER ASKED Bill Ayers hardly defines achievement in journalism:


Megyn Kelly could upset Ayers’ game plan by telling him to his face “You helped bring defeat to your own country. You gave the enemy reason to hold out in hopes of a political victory. Everything you stood for and did got a lot of Americans killed. So please don’t tell me the group you founded, the Weather Underground, did not kill anyone.”​

 
Dang.

From the thread title, I thought it would be about Duh Donuld and Melania's meeting and her giving up all her johns and keeping just one don.
 

Forum List

Back
Top