The Benghazi Bungler

Discussion in 'Tea Party' started by Flanders, Oct 12, 2012.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    Joe Biden has to be singing this one today:

    I wonder if Biden would have performed his five acts of vaudeville had Martha Raddatz played it square:

    Angry Joe and Martha vs. that nice Ryan fellow from Accounting
    By: John Hayward
    10/11/2012 11:43 PM

    Veep debate: Angry Joe and Martha vs. that nice Ryan fellow from Accounting - Conservative News

    Considering Raddatz’s performance conservatives have to wonder if Hussein is singing this one to Candy Crowley:

    Jocularity aside, an avalanche is going to bury Hussein on November 6. With 25 days remaining until election day the media cannot stop it; nevertheless, the MSM is going to devote 99 percent of its coverage to a lost presidential race; so it is up to conservatives, Tea Parties, and concerned independents to stress the importance of winning every Senate seat. Tea Parties must concentrate on setting off a Senate landslide. Everyone who understands getting rid of Hussein is not enough to turn this country around has a mere four weeks to get the Senate message out on the Internet.

    Should the Democrats keep 45 to 49 Senate seats they will retain plenty of clout in confirmation hearings. Why is it important to neuter Democrats long enough to get some decent people confirmed? The answer is in the people Hussein & Company confirmed; often with RINO support. Here’s the cream of Hussein’s crop: Kagan, Sotomayor, Susan Rice, Eric Holder, Leon E. Panetta, Janet Napolitano, Hilda L. Solis, Kathleen Sebelius, Steven Chu, Arne Duncan, Timothy F. Geithner, and leave us not forget the Benghazi Bungler, Hillary Clinton.


    Need I say more?
     
  2. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    The Intelligence community was blamed for the attacks on 9-11-2001. In fact, after 9-11-2001 every intelligence agency was put under one umbrella controlled by one man, the National Director of Intelligence. It was a bad idea then, and it’s a bad idea now. That’s why I’m surprised Hussein would blame the intelligence community after the Democrats got everything they lusted after for decades —— control of every intelligence agency for political purposes. If Democrats had that control during the Cold War the Soviet Union would still be terrorizing the world.

    Initially, Susan Rice blamed 9-11-2012 on intelligence community failures when her 5-talk-shows misinformation campaign about a video no one saw backfired. As recently as last Thursday night Joe Biden blamed the Benghazi murders on the intelligence community.

    Let’s go back to the blame for 9-11-2001. It belongs on the Clintons; notably Jamie Gorelick’s infamous memo:


    Jamie Gorelick’s Incompetence Helped Cause 9/11 AND the Housing Collapse” Why is She on Obama’s Short List for FBI Director ?
    by Jeff Dunetz
    Posted on March 25 2011 5:30 pm

    Jamie Gorelick’s Incompetence Helped Cause 9/11 AND the Housing Collapse” Why is She on Obama’s Short List for FBI Director ? | NewsReal Blog

    Rather than rake up intelligence community coals and Gorelick’s Wall, Hillary decided to throw Rice and Hussein to the wolves in an effort to keep her presidential hopes alive:

    Hillary Clinton reveals what REALLY led to Benghazi massacre - and demolishes White House claim it was triggered by anti-Islam film
    By Toby Harnden In Washington
    PUBLISHED: 22:24 EST, 9 October 2012 | UPDATED: 13:34 EST, 10 October 2012

    Death of U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens revealed: AK-47s, grenade attacks, and a smoke-filled safe-room | Mail Online

    The silver lining:

    Both Clinton and Rice are finished.
     
  3. waltky
    Offline

    waltky Wise ol' monkey Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    20,905
    Thanks Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Okolona, KY
    Ratings:
    +3,889
    The buck stops here...
    :eusa_eh:
    Clinton: 'I take responsibility' for Benghazi
    October 15th, 2012 - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the bucks stops with her when it comes to who is blame for a deadly assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi.
    See also:

    When Did Obama First Meet with NSC After Benghazi? WH Isn't Saying
    October 15, 2012 – The White House isn't saying when President Barack Obama first met with his National Security Council to discuss the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans, including U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens.
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2012
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    To waltky: The buck stops here means nothing coming from one of the architects of the massacre in Waco, Texas. Were she sincere about Benghazi she would resign. She did not even fire Susan Rice who lied through her teeth from the start.

    Incidentally, Janet Reno said “The buck stops with me.” after the Clinton Administration slaughtered over 80 Americans in the Branch Davidian Compound. Reno kept her job and that was the end of it.

    Bottom line: “The buck stops here” has become a meaningless sop designed to shush public outrage. Today, it is a guarantied pardon for leading Democrats who are drenched in American blood. Not only in getting American soldiers killed in foreign lands by giving aid and comfort to the enemy as they did in Vietnam, Iraq, and now Afghanistan, but by being responsible for the deaths of American civilians.

    For a liar like Clinton to insist:


    would be laughed out of town if whitewashing their part in the murders of four Americans was not the reason for the lie.

    A liar defending liars is a farce. Hell, Biden is an admitted liar. This Administration has lied about everything from day one; so why would anybody believe anything Clinton says? Do the spinmeisters really think the American people are suddenly going to believe an accomplished liar like Hillary Clinton because dead Americans are involved? To top Democrats getting Americans killed is all the more reason to lie.

    Here’s the hook:


    Some might conclude that defending the failed Arab Spring is the primary reason for Clinton’s comment. Justifying that failed policy is a smokescreen at best. Clinton is talking about not retreating from the New World Order’s global government agenda. In Clinton-speak Victoria’s pronoun means justifying her ambition. “WE” sure as hell isn’t speaking for me, or for a majority of Americans.

    Finally, it is nothing more than arrogance for Clinton to imply that diplomacy will be stopped when the Socialist worldview is finally discredited and discarded. Even if her worst nightmare comes true —— shutting down the United Nations —— diplomacy will thrive in another form; one more beneficial to the American people.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2012
  5. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    Jack Cashill offers a nice clarification on “blame-sharing” in the aftermath of the Waco Massacre:

    Hillary's Janet Reno imitation
    Exclusive: Jack Cashill explains why AG's 'buck stops here' gambit worked in '93
    Published: 11 hours ago
    by JACK CASHILL

    Hillary’s Janet Reno imitation

    NOTE: Cashill puts the dead at 74. I never could find an official total. Most often the number is put in the low 80s.
     

Share This Page