The Amendment to remove the 2nd.

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by RetiredGySgt, Dec 29, 2012.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    Since case law and reality are all against the Courts suddenly deciding military type weapons are not protected by the 2nd and that it isn't an individual right....

    Here is your chance, tell us what you want as the Amendment to remove the 2nd amendment.

    This is in the clean debate forum, so keep it clean.
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    Not a single response, figures, cowards one and all.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,249
    Thanks Received:
    14,915
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,038
    You're way way way way optimistic borderline naive on what would happen if Thomas, Alito or Scalia were to be replaced by another Kagan.

    They would reverse themselves almost immediately
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. neoliberal
    Offline

    neoliberal Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    I dont quite understand what your asking here. How and admendment should be written to help resend the second?
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    The gun grabbers claim they don't want to ban all firearms. So let us see your new amendment that would replace the 2nd.
     
  6. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    There wouldn’t need to be a new amendment, allowing the issue to be addressed only by Congress and/or the states.
     
  7. 9thIDdoc
    Offline

    9thIDdoc Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,784
    Thanks Received:
    594
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Ratings:
    +1,693
    Can't be done without trashing the Constitution and thereby starting a bloodbath.
     
  8. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,568
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    Right now case law states that military style weapons are protected by the second, further that it is an individual right. Pray tell how does the Congress ban "assault weapons" with that case law?
     
  9. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    The mistake is in believing that a law against assault weapons would get them off the streets. The reality is those weapons would become more valuable.
     
  10. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    37,555
    Thanks Received:
    4,548
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,063
    Ban nothing.
    Tax $500 per pistol, $1,000 per rifle.

    Jack up license and renewal fees. Tax bullets, shells, materials to make bullets, shells, etc....

    Tax rifle scopes, laser sights, and holsters.

    Call it "mayhem taxes" to help pay for the damage that they cause.

    Either that or just come to the all-too-evident conclusion that the 2nd amendment was an idiotic amendment written prior to gasoline engines and has no place in an advanced society.
     

Share This Page