Since case law and reality are all against the Courts suddenly deciding military type weapons are not protected by the 2nd and that it isn't an individual right.... Here is your chance, tell us what you want as the Amendment to remove the 2nd amendment. This is in the clean debate forum, so keep it clean.
You're way way way way optimistic borderline naive on what would happen if Thomas, Alito or Scalia were to be replaced by another Kagan. They would reverse themselves almost immediately
I dont quite understand what your asking here. How and admendment should be written to help resend the second?
The gun grabbers claim they don't want to ban all firearms. So let us see your new amendment that would replace the 2nd.
There wouldnt need to be a new amendment, allowing the issue to be addressed only by Congress and/or the states.
Right now case law states that military style weapons are protected by the second, further that it is an individual right. Pray tell how does the Congress ban "assault weapons" with that case law?
The mistake is in believing that a law against assault weapons would get them off the streets. The reality is those weapons would become more valuable.
Ban nothing. Tax $500 per pistol, $1,000 per rifle. Jack up license and renewal fees. Tax bullets, shells, materials to make bullets, shells, etc.... Tax rifle scopes, laser sights, and holsters. Call it "mayhem taxes" to help pay for the damage that they cause. Either that or just come to the all-too-evident conclusion that the 2nd amendment was an idiotic amendment written prior to gasoline engines and has no place in an advanced society.