The 6th great extinction is occurring

The Critically Endangered list has 105 pages, 48 species per page. The tiniest of fractions are hunted. Most are plants, insects, birds and reptiles. And what do you think would be the primary means by which climate change would cause a species to go extinct if not by habitat loss?

Fool.

Habitat loss by PEOPLE is the most critical issue at hand. The widespread destruction of the rain forests is THE leading cause of habitat destruction. You may be stupid, but we're not.

On top of clearing land for agriculture, mining, logging and setttlement, altering the planet's temperature and precipitation patterns causes habitat loss. Fool.








Precip patterns haven't been altered save in the computer models which are being shown to be less than useless due to their gross mistakes. And, the global temp is affected by the Sun, and nothing more.
 
The Critically Endangered list has 105 pages, 48 species per page. The tiniest of fractions are hunted. Most are plants, insects, birds and reptiles. And what do you think would be the primary means by which climate change would cause a species to go extinct if not by habitat loss?

Fool.

Habitat loss by PEOPLE is the most critical issue at hand. The widespread destruction of the rain forests is THE leading cause of habitat destruction. You may be stupid, but we're not.

On top of clearing land for agriculture, mining, logging and setttlement, altering the planet's temperature and precipitation patterns causes habitat loss. Fool.








Precip patterns haven't been altered save in the computer models which are being shown to be less than useless due to their gross mistakes. And, the global temp is affected by the Sun, and nothing more.
TSI is down, temperature is up. And you are an idiot.
 
The Critically Endangered list has 105 pages, 48 species per page. The tiniest of fractions are hunted. Most are plants, insects, birds and reptiles. And what do you think would be the primary means by which climate change would cause a species to go extinct if not by habitat loss?

Fool.

Habitat loss by PEOPLE is the most critical issue at hand. The widespread destruction of the rain forests is THE leading cause of habitat destruction. You may be stupid, but we're not.

On top of clearing land for agriculture, mining, logging and setttlement, altering the planet's temperature and precipitation patterns causes habitat loss. Fool.








Precip patterns haven't been altered save in the computer models which are being shown to be less than useless due to their gross mistakes. And, the global temp is affected by the Sun, and nothing more.
TSI is down, temperature is up. And you are an idiot.





Temps aren't up. It's called fraud. But you know all about that.
 
Really? Temperatures are not up? Then what is melting the glaciers worldwide? And why is the Greenland Ice Cap melting? Why is the Arctic Sea Ice disappearing?

So we are back to the pre-2000 arguement that the temperatures are not rising. That argument was abandoned because almost everyone could see that to be false right out there back door.

Speaking of the Arctic Sea Ice

N_stddev_timeseries_thumb.png


Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag
 
Is it really so evil and wrong not to want the Tiger, Bear or Lion to die out?


Not at all...it is, however, evil and wrong to use their troubles which are not related to your politics to further advance your political goals. That is called justifying the means with the ends...and it is the road to tyranny....
 
Last edited:


Anyone that would stop people from saving animals is evil...A destroyer of gods creation and probably will burn in hell for doing so...

conservatives are disgusting pigs for putting greed above our planets habitability.
 


Anyone that would stop people from saving animals is evil...A destroyer of gods creation and probably will burn in hell for doing so...

conservatives are disgusting pigs for putting greed above our planets habitability.


No matthew...I made my point perfectly clear and as usual, you twist it into a statement that I didn't make in an effort to make your point valid..Lets start with a base point....how many human lives or how much human suffering do you think any individual species is worth?
 
Is it really so evil and wrong not to want the Tiger, Bear or Lion to die out?


Not at all...it is, however, evil and wrong to use their troubles which are not related to your politics to further advance your political goals. That is called justifying the means with the ends...and it is the road to tyranny....

If YOUR politics endangers them - and it most certainly does - then to save them we must fight you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top