Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.All individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away.Natural rights are Recognized and guaranteed, in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.Natural rights are not granted by man.we Are Quibbling, right winger.Again self-defense is a natural rightNatural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment; Only, clearly expressed, civil rights.
The milita being the whole body of the people except for a few public officers.However in the whole and Entire world, did you come up with that reasoning?it's a natural right to self-defense.we Are Quibbling, right winger.Again self-defense is a natural rightNatural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.Self defense is a natural right
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
The second amendment is the means to preserve that right.
Our Second Amendment clearly Expresses the Intent and Purpose for the second clause, in the first clause. The Militia of the United States Must understand that a First Clause has precedence over a Second Clause.
Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.All individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away.Natural rights are Recognized and guaranteed, in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.Natural rights are not granted by man.we Are Quibbling, right winger.Again self-defense is a natural right
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment; Only, clearly expressed, civil rights.
Wrong analogy.Order over Chaos means, the First Clause commands the Second Clause.
Every First Sergeant knows that. As does, every "Second Sargeant".
Well regulated militia of the whole People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The milita being the whole body of the people except for a few public officers.However in the whole and Entire world, did you come up with that reasoning?it's a natural right to self-defense.we Are Quibbling, right winger.Again self-defense is a natural rightNatural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
The second amendment is the means to preserve that right.
Our Second Amendment clearly Expresses the Intent and Purpose for the second clause, in the first clause. The Militia of the United States Must understand that a First Clause has precedence over a Second Clause.
I don't have to believe in Your god. You can't even Obey any of His commandments.Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.All individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away.Natural rights are Recognized and guaranteed, in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.Natural rights are not granted by man.we Are Quibbling, right winger.
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment; Only, clearly expressed, civil rights.
Well regulated does not mean regulations. Well regulated means in proper working order.Well regulated militia of the whole People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The milita being the whole body of the people except for a few public officers.However in the whole and Entire world, did you come up with that reasoning?it's a natural right to self-defense.we Are Quibbling, right winger.Again self-defense is a natural right
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
The second amendment is the means to preserve that right.
Our Second Amendment clearly Expresses the Intent and Purpose for the second clause, in the first clause. The Militia of the United States Must understand that a First Clause has precedence over a Second Clause.
lol. Words have meaning. We are Only discussing our Second Amendment, not your ignorance of the concept.Wrong analogy.Order over Chaos means, the First Clause commands the Second Clause.
Every First Sergeant knows that. As does, every "Second Sargeant".
There is no precedence of order in the Bill of Rights.
You don't have to. Our Founders, who were predominantly Christian, saw fit to allow us to see God in whatever way worked best for us, but they absolutely did believe that natural rights were not granted by men.I don't have to believe in Your god. You can't even Obey any of His commandments.Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.All individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away.Natural rights are Recognized and guaranteed, in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.Natural rights are not granted by man.
There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment; Only, clearly expressed, civil rights.
Only if you appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land. The right wing does that. They have no morals for their God to appreciate.Well regulated does not mean regulations. Well regulated means in proper working order.Well regulated militia of the whole People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The milita being the whole body of the people except for a few public officers.However in the whole and Entire world, did you come up with that reasoning?it's a natural right to self-defense.we Are Quibbling, right winger.
Natural rights are in State Constitutions, not our Second Amendment.
The second amendment is the means to preserve that right.
Our Second Amendment clearly Expresses the Intent and Purpose for the second clause, in the first clause. The Militia of the United States Must understand that a First Clause has precedence over a Second Clause.
You are full of fallacy; Your God cannot love that. This I know, A Bible Tells me so.You don't have to. Our Founders, who were predominantly Christian, saw fit to allow us to see God in whatever way worked best for us, but they absolutely did believe that natural rights were not granted by men.I don't have to believe in Your god. You can't even Obey any of His commandments.Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.All individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away.Natural rights are Recognized and guaranteed, in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.
There are no natural rights in our Second Amendment; Only, clearly expressed, civil rights.
Yes, words do have meaning. In fact we can read those words and see that they do not grant us right but are restrictions on government from removing our natural rights.lol. Words have meaning. We are Only discussing our Second Amendment, not your ignorance of the concept.Wrong analogy.Order over Chaos means, the First Clause commands the Second Clause.
Every First Sergeant knows that. As does, every "Second Sargeant".
There is no precedence of order in the Bill of Rights.
You are getting off subject here.You are full of fallacy; Your God cannot love that. This I know, A Bible Tells me so.You don't have to. Our Founders, who were predominantly Christian, saw fit to allow us to see God in whatever way worked best for us, but they absolutely did believe that natural rights were not granted by men.I don't have to believe in Your god. You can't even Obey any of His commandments.Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.All individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away.
Again I will state, that you are getting off subject here.Only if you appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land. The right wing does that. They have no morals for their God to appreciate.Well regulated does not mean regulations. Well regulated means in proper working order.Well regulated militia of the whole People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The milita being the whole body of the people except for a few public officers.However in the whole and Entire world, did you come up with that reasoning?it's a natural right to self-defense.
The second amendment is the means to preserve that right.
Our Second Amendment clearly Expresses the Intent and Purpose for the second clause, in the first clause. The Militia of the United States Must understand that a First Clause has precedence over a Second Clause.
Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.Only if you appeal to ignorance of our supreme law of the land. The right wing does that. They have no morals for their God to appreciate.Well regulated does not mean regulations. Well regulated means in proper working order.Well regulated militia of the whole People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.The milita being the whole body of the people except for a few public officers.However in the whole and Entire world, did you come up with that reasoning?it's a natural right to self-defense.
The second amendment is the means to preserve that right.
Our Second Amendment clearly Expresses the Intent and Purpose for the second clause, in the first clause. The Militia of the United States Must understand that a First Clause has precedence over a Second Clause.
Our Written Constitution and written supreme law of the land, establishes our civil rights, not our natural rights.Yes, words do have meaning. In fact we can read those words and see that they do not grant us right but are restrictions on government from removing our natural rights.lol. Words have meaning. We are Only discussing our Second Amendment, not your ignorance of the concept.Wrong analogy.Order over Chaos means, the First Clause commands the Second Clause.
Every First Sergeant knows that. As does, every "Second Sargeant".
There is no precedence of order in the Bill of Rights.
You have to be Loyal to a God, to be taken seriously. The right wing Only cares about natural rights when it is specifically about guns.You are getting off subject here.You are full of fallacy; Your God cannot love that. This I know, A Bible Tells me so.You don't have to. Our Founders, who were predominantly Christian, saw fit to allow us to see God in whatever way worked best for us, but they absolutely did believe that natural rights were not granted by men.I don't have to believe in Your god. You can't even Obey any of His commandments.Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.We also have a First Amendment and State equivalents.
You should re-read the DOI to see where their authority to establish our sovereignty came from.
Right, God has granted us our natural rights. The DOI and the Constitution with its amendments restricts the government from removing our God given natural rights. Read the DOI.Our Written Constitution and written supreme law of the land, establishes our civil rights, not our natural rights.Yes, words do have meaning. In fact we can read those words and see that they do not grant us right but are restrictions on government from removing our natural rights.lol. Words have meaning. We are Only discussing our Second Amendment, not your ignorance of the concept.Wrong analogy.Order over Chaos means, the First Clause commands the Second Clause.
Every First Sergeant knows that. As does, every "Second Sargeant".
There is no precedence of order in the Bill of Rights.
No. I only have to speak the truth and be able to back it up which I have done.You have to be Loyal to a God, to be taken seriously. The right wing Only cares about natural rights when it is specifically about guns.You are getting off subject here.You are full of fallacy; Your God cannot love that. This I know, A Bible Tells me so.You don't have to. Our Founders, who were predominantly Christian, saw fit to allow us to see God in whatever way worked best for us, but they absolutely did believe that natural rights were not granted by men.I don't have to believe in Your god. You can't even Obey any of His commandments.Which are restrictions on government. They don't claim to grant us these rights. They prescribe a limitation on government from trying to take away our God given natural rights.
You should re-read the DOI to see where their authority to establish our sovereignty came from.
