The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011

It was a nightstick.

And standing outside a polling place would not assist those goons in spotting voter fraud, anyway.

List the law(s) that was/were broken. Just one, if you will...please.
 
Why is it that radical Blacks think that dressing in a uniform and showing a gloved fist is an example of reasonable political speech? Can it be the democrat party convinced Blacks that they are still in bondage and they should hate their Country for keeping them down while other people literally crawl across the desert to get to the greatest Country in the world?
 
It was a nightstick.

And standing outside a polling place would not assist those goons in spotting voter fraud, anyway.

List the law(s) that was/were broken. Just one, if you will...please.

Repost the post where I said that they had broken a law.

Just one.

Oh, and btw, Happy New(ish) Year.

Happy New Year to you sir.

How can you throw that in and disarm me while I'm trying to verbally dismantle you?

:)

All the best to you and yours in 2012 and beyond my friend.

With that said, that's the point, no laws were broken, hence...a fake outrage. RW poutrage.
 
Last edited:
List the law(s) that was/were broken. Just one, if you will...please.

Repost the post where I said that they had broken a law.

Just one.

Oh, and btw, Happy New(ish) Year.

Happy New Year to you sir.

How can you throw that in and disarm me while I'm trying to verbally dismantle you?

:)

All the best to you and yours in 2012 and beyon my friend.

With that said, that's the point, no laws were broken, hence...a fake outrage. RW poutrage.

Nice try. Points for effort, amigo!

HOWEVER, it must be done. I am compelled to expose your fallacious (piss poor) excuse for "reasoning."

One need not be engaged in criminal behavior for that behavior to be objectionable.

And it might even be that standing in front of a polling place with nightsticks COULD constitute criminal behavior.

For instance, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 states [see Section 11(b)] that "No person … shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce … any person for voting or attempting to vote."

It seems to me that having a couple of goons armed with one or more nightsticks standing outside of a polling place MIGHT intimidate a voter or two and and the mere presence of nightstick(s) MIGHT constitute a threat.

Ergo, no "faux" to the outrage at all.

Thank me. :D
 
Nice try. Points for effort, amigo!

HOWEVER, it must be done. I am compelled to expose your fallacious (piss poor) excuse for "reasoning."

One need not be engaged in criminal behavior for that behavior to be objectionable.

And it might even be that standing in front of a polling place with nightsticks COULD constitute criminal behavior.

For instance, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 states [see Section 11(b)] that "No person … shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce … any person for voting or attempting to vote."

It seems to me that having a couple of goons armed with one or more nightsticks standing outside of a polling place MIGHT intimidate a voter or two and and the mere presence of nightstick(s) MIGHT constitute a threat.

Ergo, no "faux" to the outrage at all.

Thank me. :D
You crazy, crazy, crazy RWer you...no laws were broken.

Uddawize...dey wood be arrestid by now. :D
 
Democrats have used radical left wing Blacks for fifty years and the jerks don't even realize that they are being manipulated by the party of segregation. Left wing Black radicals have been taught to ridicule successful Black men and women like Clarence Thomas, and Dr. Condie Rice and they have been filled with such hatred that they can't even think straight.
 
The dumb dumb hard RW palookas wanted Eric Holder's head for not prosecuting 2 black guys fore PEACEFULLY standing in their OWN voting districts.

They called a small plastic stick a weapon, while fighting and screaming about their rights to carry ASSAULT RIFLES to Obama rallies.

I mean, you can't make this stuff up!!!

:lol:

Why do you have an adultering racist as an avatar?

Why do you have a gay biker as an avatar?
 
Democrats have used radical left wing Blacks for fifty years and the jerks don't even realize that they are being manipulated by the party of segregation. Left wing Black radicals have been taught to ridicule successful Black men and women like Clarence Thomas, and Dr. Condie Rice and they have been filled with such hatred that they can't even think straight.

Another 'Blacks are not smart enough to understand what liberals are doing to them' tirade. And conservatives are not racists.
 
Democrats have used radical left wing Blacks for fifty years and the jerks don't even realize that they are being manipulated by the party of segregation. Left wing Black radicals have been taught to ridicule successful Black men and women like Clarence Thomas, and Dr. Condie Rice and they have been filled with such hatred that they can't even think straight.

Another 'Blacks are not smart enough to understand what liberals are doing to them' tirade. And conservatives are not racists.

Maybe radical Blacks are smart and maybe they aren't. Is it racist to talk about it? Play the race card when you are plumb out of ideas but tell me why the hell left wing Black radicals attack moderate successful Black people like Justice Thomas, Dr. Condie Rice and Herman Cain? Lilly white lefties manage to twist logic like a pretzel to avoid being called racist. Maybe they are timid and maybe their own latent racism keeps them from speaking out. Anybody who defends a couple of thugs in uniform reminiscent of nazi brownshirts and armed with clubs too short to be waking sticks because they don't want to be called racist, needs their no-nuke heads examined.
 
xotoxi-albums-op-assessment-picture4184-op-assessment.gif
 
Guess which one tops the list?

The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011 | | AlterNet

And guess which one MOST of the hard RW palookas post as some "evidence" of fraud of misconduct on our very own USMB?

RWers really crack me up.

:lol:

Interesting Fast and Furious wasn't on the list!

Second, Solyndra was not a ridiculous outrage, that was a legit outrage and I am SHOCKED anyone could marginalize it!

Third, Black Panther thugs outnumber KKK membership, so should we say race hustlers like you have ridiculous outrages when screaming about the KKK?
 
Guess which one tops the list?

The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011 | | AlterNet

And guess which one MOST of the hard RW palookas post as some "evidence" of fraud of misconduct on our very own USMB?

RWers really crack me up.

:lol:

Interesting Fast and Furious wasn't on the list!

Second, Solyndra was not a ridiculous outrage, that was a legit outrage and I am SHOCKED anyone could marginalize it!

Third, Black Panther thugs outnumber KKK membership, so should we say race hustlers like you have ridiculous outrages when screaming about the KKK?

Tell us sage, how many members are there in The New Black Panther Party?

Links would suffice.

Thanks.
 
What about Obama appointing Larry Summers as Chairman of his economic counsel?

Is this one of the top 10 democrat outrages?

No, but it sure points out another false outrage from the right. Such an appointment doesn't characterize Obama as a MARXIST! or SOCIALIST!! as the right wing has done.

:eusa_eh:
Larry Sommers is hardly a socialist or marxist,
He is arguably one of the most corrupt people in Washington...period.
I am seriously doubting you have any idea why.
You should be completely outraged and mystified why Obama appointed him as his chief economic adviser.

No shit, who said Larry Sommers was a socialist or a marxist. Try to read without bias next time.

I'm not pleased that any of those from Wall Street are on the team; that said, if you want to stop a thief, hire a their.
 
Nice try. Points for effort, amigo!

HOWEVER, it must be done. I am compelled to expose your fallacious (piss poor) excuse for "reasoning."

One need not be engaged in criminal behavior for that behavior to be objectionable.

And it might even be that standing in front of a polling place with nightsticks COULD constitute criminal behavior.

For instance, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 states [see Section 11(b)] that "No person … shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce … any person for voting or attempting to vote."

It seems to me that having a couple of goons armed with one or more nightsticks standing outside of a polling place MIGHT intimidate a voter or two and and the mere presence of nightstick(s) MIGHT constitute a threat.

Ergo, no "faux" to the outrage at all.

Thank me. :D
You crazy, crazy, crazy RWer you...no laws were broken.

Uddawize...dey wood be arrestid by now. :D

That's a silly thing to say.

They WEREN'T arrested by now or at all, but that doesn't mean no law was broken.

Silly silly silly.

All it means is that somebody (or entities) CHOSE not to apply the law in their case.
 
Guess which one tops the list?

The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011 | | AlterNet

And guess which one MOST of the hard RW palookas post as some "evidence" of fraud of misconduct on our very own USMB?

RWers really crack me up.

:lol:

Doesnt this just sum up the right wing cry baby fest perfectly:

In what may be the most “meta” conspiracy theory of the year, Fox's Steve Doocey suggested that the only reason the network's endless parade of half-cooked scandals never caught on was the mainstream media's hopeless liberal bias. But when Huffington Post's Sam Stein looked at the media's coverage of Muffin-gate, he found that of 223 news stories that mentioned the “$16 muffins” from September 20-28, only 37 attempted to correct the record.

Influencing the Ref...It's an old cry baby tactic
 
AlterNet really cracks me up...

Okay ... watch the responses.

The rw's can't counter even one point so they take shots at the source.

Just like, not one rw has answered my challenge to post a list of Repub accomplishments. they can't because they're aren't any. So, instead, they criticize my source.

Cracks ME up!

Just before this post was this pearl of wisdom:

Outrages? The left has pretty thin skin these days. Two rediculous looking Black guys dressed up to look like domestic terrorists want to tell us about non-existant conspiracies against muslems and whine about Fox. Not surprising.

Cant dispute it so fling shit at it
 
That's a silly thing to say.

They WEREN'T arrested by now or at all, but that doesn't mean no law was broken.

Silly silly silly.

All it means is that somebody (or entities) CHOSE not to apply the law in their case.
Well...the incident on the tape occured during the Bush Regime, so I'll let you determine what that means or doesn't mean.

:D
 

Forum List

Back
Top