The Real Crimes of Russiagate
At least Pat has a clue of what is going on, okay left wing idiots chime in wit your useless hot air.
At least Pat has a clue of what is going on, okay left wing idiots chime in wit your useless hot air.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think Pat is quite capable of hot air generation on his own.
Ok, cool, have a nice weekend with your partisanshit.I think Pat is quite capable of hot air generation on his own.
Not like the left wingers and this Russian crock.
since you are so hot on the constitution, why arent you on bill and hillary's ass about the brady bill, which was a violation of the constitution.Russiagate is Orange Jesus trying to defy the Constitution and his worshippers agreeing with him.
since you are so hot on the constitution, why arent you on bill and hillary's ass about the brady bill, which was a violation of the constitution.Russiagate is Orange Jesus trying to defy the Constitution and his worshippers agreeing with him.
Ok, cool, have a nice weekend with your partisanshit.I think Pat is quite capable of hot air generation on his own.
Not like the left wingers and this Russian crock.
not a trump supportersince you are so hot on the constitution, why arent you on bill and hillary's ass about the brady bill, which was a violation of the constitution.Russiagate is Orange Jesus trying to defy the Constitution and his worshippers agreeing with him.
lol
poorly educated trumptards ...
Russiagate is Orange Jesus trying to defy the Constitution and his worshippers agreeing with him.
For a year, the big question of Russiagate has boiled down to this: Did Donald Trump’s campaign collude with the Russians in hacking the DNC?
So what, then, IS the big question?From the very start of the article:
What is there to say? That is not the central question for which anyone in the DoJ is seeking an answer. Maybe it's a question someone's trying to answer, but it's not the central question in the mind of Mueller or the Congressional leadership that's investigating the "Russia" matter.For a year, the big question of Russiagate has boiled down to this: Did Donald Trump’s campaign collude with the Russians in hacking the DNC?
Certainly, however, one can commence one's rhetorical spiel with that as the premise, but those who are closely paying attention will know that premise is sophistic as a starting point. Starting with sophistic premises is part of why we have saying "if they can get you asking the wrong question, the answers don't matter." Buchanan's opening statement in his essay is a fine illustration of precisely that.
I don't believe there is a big question and I'm certain the one Buchanan posited isn't any of the big questions that the DoJ and Congressional investigators are seeking to answer.So what, then, IS the big question?From the very start of the article:
What is there to say? That is not the central question for which anyone in the DoJ is seeking an answer. Maybe it's a question someone's trying to answer, but it's not the central question in the mind of Mueller or the Congressional leadership that's investigating the "Russia" matter.For a year, the big question of Russiagate has boiled down to this: Did Donald Trump’s campaign collude with the Russians in hacking the DNC?
Certainly, however, one can commence one's rhetorical spiel with that as the premise, but those who are closely paying attention will know that premise is sophistic as a starting point. Starting with sophistic premises is part of why we have saying "if they can get you asking the wrong question, the answers don't matter." Buchanan's opening statement in his essay is a fine illustration of precisely that.
Ya don't see me whining about "right wingers" because I understand the ruse is for the unsubstantial people. Goldman Sachs always ends up running your white house either way; the donor class has it covered "either" way. but do go on.Ok, cool, have a nice weekend with your partisanshit.I think Pat is quite capable of hot air generation on his own.
Not like the left wingers and this Russian crock.
Same to you.
I don't believe there is a big question and I'm certain the one Buchanan posited isn't any of the big questions that the DoJ and Congressional investigators are seeking to answer.So what, then, IS the big question?From the very start of the article:
What is there to say? That is not the central question for which anyone in the DoJ is seeking an answer. Maybe it's a question someone's trying to answer, but it's not the central question in the mind of Mueller or the Congressional leadership that's investigating the "Russia" matter.For a year, the big question of Russiagate has boiled down to this: Did Donald Trump’s campaign collude with the Russians in hacking the DNC?
Certainly, however, one can commence one's rhetorical spiel with that as the premise, but those who are closely paying attention will know that premise is sophistic as a starting point. Starting with sophistic premises is part of why we have saying "if they can get you asking the wrong question, the answers don't matter." Buchanan's opening statement in his essay is a fine illustration of precisely that.
Among the people I talk to and in my mind, the key questions are these:
All those questions rely on one premise: the Russians did meddle in the 2016 election process. That premise is one about which -- for not one person who matters, other than Donald Trump and a small handful of his sycophants -- there is no disagreement.
- What was the nature and extent of Russian meddling in the 2016 electoral process, and to what extent did it achieve what ends?
- Were there any Americans who were complicit with or otherwise party to the Russian meddling in the 2016 electoral process? If so who and what is the nature and extent of their involvement? Is it ongoing?
- What, if any, are the ongoing Russian efforts to undermine America's democracy and the institutions and individuals on which/whom it depends?
- In light of the answers to the preceding questions, what should be the next steps? Why and/or why not?
Pat Buchanan is a great American.The Real Crimes of Russiagate
At least Pat has a clue of what is going on, okay left wing idiots chime in wit your useless hot air.