Rye Catcher
Platinum Member
- Nov 21, 2019
- 12,780
- 7,609
- 940
- Banned
- #2,921
That's a bullshit argument. (eyeroll)You see how that bypasses due process and takes away a right PRIOR TO due process, right? That is ass backwards.No, going back to background checks, the decision is made if someone does not meet the standards to be trusted to own, possess or have in their custody or control a weapon/Arm. A legislature which passes such a law would set up standards, up to appeal of course (that is where due process comes in) if a person is denied what you believe is a right.
But Miller puts that issue to rest while also shooting down bans on the M4 and M249. (holding that a weapon must have a reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia)Consider gravity and push button knives and Nun chucks; they are regulated or outlawed in a number of States. They are Arms, capable of deadly force and to my knowledge have never received the attention as do firearms.
Because such a bill would immediately be shot down (pun intended). If you can't win outright, you must go at it in backdoor fashion, which you gun grabber have....REPEATEDLY. You even made us fight you all the way to the SCOTUS over whether the right to bear arms is an individual right, when you motherfuckers know good and goddamn well that it is. You were just trying to backdoor it. You know you were.The issues on gun control are moot, too many on your side of the argument claim gun control is equivalent to the first step in repealing the 2nd A. No bill has ever been put forth to do so, and IMO people who are sober, sane and law abiding have every right to own, possess and have in their custody and control a defensive weapon in their home or place of business (if their employer approves), along with Scalia's opinion in Heller.
This is why your ilk can never be trusted. You don't give a cocksucking rat fuck about preserving OUR rights. You want to take them away, by any means possible.
Stop denying it. It does nothing but make us even more suspicious of ANYTHING you try.
.
I'm not denying anything, your post here is what I meant by Moot; we will never agree on any aspect of gun control no matter how many victims end up in the morgue and how you view gun control.
You believe "shall not infringe" is sacrosanct, unless someone is either a felon or mentally ill. Without vetting in a comprehensive background check, we will only know after the shooter kills innocent victims that he is a felon and/or mentally ill.
In short you would put your right to own guns without any interference from the government before the right to live by a child who is at school, in church or attending a concert; before any clerk in any store, or someone in the wrong place at the wrong time when some kook is seeking suicide by cop.
Freedom ain't safe and it never will be, but it's better than the alternative....... always.
Wrong, but I respect you right to express your opinion. Without being too abstract, consider there are no atheists in a fox hole.