Textbook Racism

[PoliticalChic]

Did Obama ever say that white people are too stupid to vote for him?

I certainly accept that you're pretty stupid, but that has naught to do with the fact, proven in this thread, that the racist Democrat Party has changed from racist anti-black, to the current racist anti-white.


In 2011, the Democrat Party boasted that it had given up considering whites as a constituency.
They made no secret of it....and by degrees has become a bully to whites.


"Working-class white voters feel abandoned by the Democratic Party.

As America’s non-Hispanic White population shrinks due to the influx of non-European immigration and low white birth rates, cultural enclaves have begun to form all over the nation. Starting in the late 1960s and accelerating over the past decade, the Democratic Party has abandoned its traditional base of working-class white voters to embrace minority immigrant groups. Although this has boded well for them in places like California, it won’t last.

The red shift didn’t occur because people suddenly became Koch brothers-loving investors who want to grow their portfolio and bring in cheap foreign labor. It’s because the Republican Party is changing to reflect the interests of the white working class in these states. This solidified after Trump’s election in 2016. And why not? As the Democrats’ political rhetoric and policy proposals have become more explicitly anti-white and socialistic, naturally white voters will look for a political home elsewhere."
The Democratic Party Is Killing Itself

 

[PoliticalChic]

“During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

And the stats prove Lemon correct. Deal with the truth for once in your worthless life.

So, being a racist is okay as long as you can provide stats that back up your claim?

But....but.......the party has ALWAYS....been racist.

They've simply altered the target of their hatred.



Let's review their history:

1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.

11. I should mention that the Democrat Party was used as a model by Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party….another ‘feather’ in the party’s cap?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Whether it was lots of melanin, or lack of melanin....it has always been the basis for selection to lead the nation.....at least for Democrats.





"Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan ‘White Supremacy’?
Until 1966, the official logo of the Alabama Democratic Party featured a crowing rooster and a banner reading "White Supremacy."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dem-party-logo-white-supremacy/

The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party. Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election: United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia

If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well.

There is some debate where the conservative Southern Democrats went after '72. They're dying off now but I'm going to say in Missouri the good ol boys are largely Republican. The R's had only put military hero Eisenhower (of the military industrial complex speech) into the oval office between 1928 and 1968. No doubt they wern't happy with but also weren't brave enough to turn away 13% of the popular vote.

The end result is racism is bad. If we can get enough Republicans to drive the white supremacists to vote for some other party it would be a real stand up thing to do.

1. "The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party."
Well, there's one American party, and one racist party....as proven in this thread.




2. "Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election: United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia"

The was no such split.

Let's prove it.

“The Republican campaign slogan from the Nixon era- which tagged the Democrats as being the party of ‘acid, amnesty and abortion’- was clearly not about race, but referred instead to the hippie life style, to the Vietnam War and to the permissive 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision. Nixon’s voters were, as in Merle Haggard’s famous 1969 song, Okies from Muskogee who refuse to take drugs or dodge the draft and ‘like living right and being free.’ ….certainly not about racism or white supremacy.” D’Souza, "Death of a Nation," p.24

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.




3. "If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well."

Watch this:
"Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em.

“When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy



4. The proof is so simple.....not as simple as you are....but simple nonetheless.
The racist Democrats were Dixiecrats....not Dixiecans.

And they went right back to voting for Democrats.

 

[PoliticalChic]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

 

[Toronado3800]

Whether it was lots of melanin, or lack of melanin....it has always been the basis for selection to lead the nation.....at least for Democrats.





"Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan ‘White Supremacy’?
Until 1966, the official logo of the Alabama Democratic Party featured a crowing rooster and a banner reading "White Supremacy."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dem-party-logo-white-supremacy/

The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party. Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election: United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia

If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well.

There is some debate where the conservative Southern Democrats went after '72. They're dying off now but I'm going to say in Missouri the good ol boys are largely Republican. The R's had only put military hero Eisenhower (of the military industrial complex speech) into the oval office between 1928 and 1968. No doubt they wern't happy with but also weren't brave enough to turn away 13% of the popular vote.

The end result is racism is bad. If we can get enough Republicans to drive the white supremacists to vote for some other party it would be a real stand up thing to do.

1. "The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party."
Well, there's one American party, and one racist party....as proven in this thread.




2. "Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election: United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia"

The was no such split.

Let's prove it.

“The Republican campaign slogan from the Nixon era- which tagged the Democrats as being the party of ‘acid, amnesty and abortion’- was clearly not about race, but referred instead to the hippie life style, to the Vietnam War and to the permissive 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision. Nixon’s voters were, as in Merle Haggard’s famous 1969 song, Okies from Muskogee who refuse to take drugs or dodge the draft and ‘like living right and being free.’ ….certainly not about racism or white supremacy.” D’Souza, "Death of a Nation," p.24

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.




3. "If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well."

Watch this:
"Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em.

“When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy



4. The proof is so simple.....not as simple as you are....but simple nonetheless.
The racist Democrats were Dixiecrats....not Dixiecans.

And they went right back to voting for Democrats.

What really matters is we both seem to think racism is wrong and you don't want them in your party. You'll go so far as to say the Republican Party has no room for racists, right? I have no party so I can't really make the same pledge, but trust me, my snowflake issue is being anti-NAZI.



Historical U.S. Presidential Elections 1789-2016

Its weird. First the northeast all voted for Lincoln and the Republicans.

After that for 70ish years the South became almost solid blue.

By the end of the 1920's capitalism looked soo bad we almost had a socialist revolution. The world changed, capitalism was saved and almost everyone voted blue until 1948.

between 1948 and 1968 you get these weird mixes. The southern U.S. votes for racist Democrats sometimes against the "national" candidate. The North voted Republican.

Then in 72 the Democrats were such a mess Nixon won EVERYTHING.

In 76 the Democrats found a Southern Democrat to unite the party and they barely beat Gerald Ford, the replacement for the vice president who resigned in scandal who took over for the president who resigned in scandal.

Since then the old Confederacy has been pretty darned red. Even sorta southerner Bill Clinton didn't make that big a dent in it.

Think I'm a regionalist? Yup. Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia Racism is thicker than donkey or elephant blood.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Whether it was lots of melanin, or lack of melanin....it has always been the basis for selection to lead the nation.....at least for Democrats.





"Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan ‘White Supremacy’?
Until 1966, the official logo of the Alabama Democratic Party featured a crowing rooster and a banner reading "White Supremacy."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dem-party-logo-white-supremacy/

The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party. Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election: United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia

If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well.

There is some debate where the conservative Southern Democrats went after '72. They're dying off now but I'm going to say in Missouri the good ol boys are largely Republican. The R's had only put military hero Eisenhower (of the military industrial complex speech) into the oval office between 1928 and 1968. No doubt they wern't happy with but also weren't brave enough to turn away 13% of the popular vote.

The end result is racism is bad. If we can get enough Republicans to drive the white supremacists to vote for some other party it would be a real stand up thing to do.

1. "The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party."
Well, there's one American party, and one racist party....as proven in this thread.




2. "Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election: United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia"

The was no such split.

Let's prove it.

“The Republican campaign slogan from the Nixon era- which tagged the Democrats as being the party of ‘acid, amnesty and abortion’- was clearly not about race, but referred instead to the hippie life style, to the Vietnam War and to the permissive 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision. Nixon’s voters were, as in Merle Haggard’s famous 1969 song, Okies from Muskogee who refuse to take drugs or dodge the draft and ‘like living right and being free.’ ….certainly not about racism or white supremacy.” D’Souza, "Death of a Nation," p.24

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.




3. "If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well."

Watch this:
"Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em.

“When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy



4. The proof is so simple.....not as simple as you are....but simple nonetheless.
The racist Democrats were Dixiecrats....not Dixiecans.

And they went right back to voting for Democrats.

What really matters is we both seem to think racism is wrong and you don't want them in your party. You'll go so far as to say the Republican Party has no room for racists, right? I have no party so I can't really make the same pledge, but trust me, my snowflake issue is being anti-NAZI.



Historical U.S. Presidential Elections 1789-2016

Its weird. First the northeast all voted for Lincoln and the Republicans.

After that for 70ish years the South became almost solid blue.

By the end of the 1920's capitalism looked soo bad we almost had a socialist revolution. The world changed, capitalism was saved and almost everyone voted blue until 1948.

between 1948 and 1968 you get these weird mixes. The southern U.S. votes for racist Democrats sometimes against the "national" candidate. The North voted Republican.

Then in 72 the Democrats were such a mess Nixon won EVERYTHING.

In 76 the Democrats found a Southern Democrat to unite the party and they barely beat Gerald Ford, the replacement for the vice president who resigned in scandal who took over for the president who resigned in scandal.

Since then the old Confederacy has been pretty darned red. Even sorta southerner Bill Clinton didn't make that big a dent in it.

Think I'm a regionalist? Yup. Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia Racism is thicker than donkey or elephant blood.

"... but trust me, my snowflake issue is being anti-NAZI."


The Nazi Party used the Democrats as their model.

1. First, the Nazis copied the Progressives/Democrats Immigration Policies.

Only the ‘right races’ welcomed.

“Progressives opposed immigration and enacted several immigration restrictions during the 1920s. Progressives also tried to force immigrants to adopt Progressive moral beliefs.” Progressive Movement - Ohio History Central

And… Immigrant Restrictions During the Progressive Era | Synonym

Hitler lauded the Progressives’ immigration policies.

“By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain racesfrom naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the folkish state concept.”
“Mein Kampf,” chapter three



“Hitler also appealed to the racially exclusionary provisions of U.S. immigration laws, specifically the 1924 Immigration Act that had been pushed by American progressives as a model of enlightened eugenic legislation. “There is today one state,” Hitler noted, “in which at least weak beginning toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course it is not our German Republic but the American union. By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the Volkish state concept.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

How about Franklin Roosevelt's attitude toward other races....?
"This attitude dovetails with what is known about FDR's views regarding immigrants in general and Asian immigrants in particular.... He recommended that future immigration should be limited to those who had "blood of the right sort." FDR's troubling view of Jews

Sieg Heil, Franklin????



2. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?

“…history of laws against miscegenation—interracial marriage or procreation—in the United States.

Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help it…” The Race Against Race

“The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.”
Adolph Hitler
Untitled Document


“At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ‘undesireables’???


“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his “The Case for Sterilization.”
(Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.


4. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



5. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!

“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”

When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes


If it weren’t so tragic, it’d be funny: the Progressives/Democrat’s programs were too rigid for the Nazis.


Amazing.

“…the Nazis balked at defining Jews as anyone possessing “one drop” of Jewish blood in line with the Democratic “one drop rule.” Incredibly the Nazis rejected the one-drop precedent of their American counterparts as too harsh. They defined a Jew as one who has predominant Jewish ancestry—usually characterized by three Jewish grandparents.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




6. The three considered the most Progressive Presidents….all had racist political views.

Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government.

FDR chose as his first Supreme Court nominee, a KKKer.

LBJ led the fight against anti-lynching laws.


7. And….the Nazis praised FDR’s policies as nearly identical to theirs.

The National Socialists hailed FDR’s ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”

b. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’

c. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”

d. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.



8. The Nazis love the Democrat policies of ‘enslave and colonize.’

Many know that Andrew Jackson is considered to be the father of the modern Democrat Party.

Will…..in that case, he should also be remembered as at least a step-father of "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei,” Hitler’s bunch.


You see, another thing the Nazis learned from the Democrats was use to push the ‘Untermenschen’ out of the way to gain ‘lebensraum.’


“….what did Hitler learn from the Democratic Party and from his fellow leftists in America? First, he credited his plan of lebensraum or “living space”—specifically, his plan to forcibly seize the land in Russia, Poland and Eastern Europe, and enslave the native inhabitants—to the Jacksonian Democrats. In a 1928 speech, Hitler noted that Americans in the Jacksonian Era had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep the modest remnant under observation in a cage.”


Historian Timothy Snyder makes the same point in Bloodlands, “As Hitler imagined the future, Germany would deal with the Slavs much as the North Americans had dealt with the Indians.” Using a formula developed by the Democrats, Hitler sought to drive the Poles, Russians and Slavs from their land; dispatch Germans to take it over; and enslave the conquered peoples that refused to leave.


Notice that Rich and Snyder, who are both progressives, never mentioned the term “Democrat.” They are content to say that Hitler got his ideas from the white man, or from the North Americans. Yet it was the Democratic Party under its founder, Andrew Jackson, and then under Jackson’s Democratic successors, that massacred the Indians and drove them west and presided over the ignominious Trail of Tears. This is the actual precedent that Hitler appealed to in formulating his plans of conquest, dispossession and enslavement.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



9. Hitler “…. did, however, learn how to frame his policies of racial discrimination and Nordic supremacy, his lebensraum strategy of mass displacement and subjugation, and his genocidal mechanisms for exterminating the “unfit,” from his fellow leftists and progressives in the United States.

This is the disgraceful legacy of the Democratic left. Scholars and media pundits who know this history are deeply frightened by it. They realize that if young people discover it, if it comes to become widely known, then the whole progressive Democratic project will be discredited. No longer will progressives be able to pose as the part of the good, the true and the beautiful; on the contrary, they will be exposed as a partly complicit in racism, mass murder and genocide.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



Everyone has seen your posts.....it's clear which party you support.
So stop lying.

 

[Toronado3800]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

 

[Moonglow]

Is the Asian OP white enough for this propaganda?

 

[PoliticalChic]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New York Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

 

[Toronado3800]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New Your Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

Curious, who are the D's pro then?

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Is the Asian OP white enough for this propaganda?

White people LOVE Asians....they speak English, they’re smart as hell, they’re clean, they don’t commit crime, they’re positive contributors, they don’t drop litters of children in the laps of good Americans and we’ve never had a flag from an Asian nation waved in our face while we hand out EBT cards.

 

[edthecynic]

“During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

And the stats prove Lemon correct. Deal with the truth for once in your worthless life.

So, being a racist is okay as long as you can provide stats that back up your claim?

No race is only male, so Lemon was not being racist,

 

[PoliticalChic]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New Your Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

"Curious, who are the D's pro then?"

You dunce.....any groups that will increase their power.



The Democrats:
Power hungry, immoral reprobates.


Hispanics are now 17% while blacks only 13%......guess who the Dems are for????


Oh....and for felons getting the vote.....Islamists.....Illegal aliens....and, of course, those who don't read and don't think,...you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

“During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

And the stats prove Lemon correct. Deal with the truth for once in your worthless life.

So, being a racist is okay as long as you can provide stats that back up your claim?

No race is only male, so Lemon was not being racist,

You back for another spanking?

Sure thing...


“In the world of identity politics, it turns out that not all identities are created equal: one identity — the one that could be applied to the majority of Americans — is forced to bear the nation’s sins.

In the academy, where leftist ideas are developed before being released into the national bloodstream, identity politics is slowly morphing into a neo-segregationist, anti-white ideology (that is also anti-Christian, anti-male, and of course, anti-American).

In the past year, there have been efforts on college campuses to exclude white students from certain dorms (the University of Connecticut), dining spaces (American University), safe spaces (Claremont McKenna College), and the campus as a whole for a “white people free day” (Evergreen State College).” America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party




Soooo.....how does it feel being used to prove my thesis?????

Truly, you are an intellect the rival of garden tools.

 

[Toronado3800]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New Your Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

"Curious, who are the D's pro then?"

You dunce.....any groups that will increase their power.



The Democrats:
Power hungry, immoral reprobates.


Hispanics are now 17% while blacks only 13%......guess who the Dems are for????


Oh....and for felons getting the vote.....Islamists.....Illegal aliens....and, of course, those who don't read and don't think,...you.

The D's are not tossing the 60% white vote and the 13% black vote to get the 17% Hispanic vote.

Quit grasping the straw. You just grabbed one too many copy and paste fear mongering post from the party master.

I will side with you entirely that political parties are machines which do whatever to keep the machine and personal power wheels turning.

Join me, lose the team worship, despise each party for what you disagree with and support what you do. You're better than these logic leaps of desperation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

To borrow from Edmond Rostand, 'as I end my refrain....thrust home!'


The aim was to highlight the anti-white racism of the Democrat Party.

And....mission accomplished.




But....just a bit more mud to throw in the Democrat's faces...

"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

...Lefty activist, writer, and lesbian Susan Sontag. Her contribution included the memorable sentiment that “The white race is the cancer of human history.” [Partisan Review, Winter 1967, pp. 57-58 ]

We can therefore say that the modern style of white ethnomasochism was born fifty years ago this Spring, and that Ms. Sontag acted as midwife to the birth.

​

She might, if she had thought ahead a bit, have trademarked the phrase “the depravity of whiteness,” which as I just reported, was actually used to promote a recent study group on “white privilege” at Santa Fe’s St. John’s College.

So this is a good place to mention, as I should have before, that anti-whites (some of them certainly white) definitively took over the Democratic Party via the February 25th election of Thomas Perez as chair of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Perez is a clever and determined foe of “the depravity of whiteness” and no doubt thinks the white race is a cancer, etc.

Put it another way, Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programs when serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New Your Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

"Curious, who are the D's pro then?"

You dunce.....any groups that will increase their power.



The Democrats:
Power hungry, immoral reprobates.


Hispanics are now 17% while blacks only 13%......guess who the Dems are for????


Oh....and for felons getting the vote.....Islamists.....Illegal aliens....and, of course, those who don't read and don't think,...you.

The D's are not tossing the 60% white vote and the 13% black vote to get the 17% Hispanic vote.

Quit grasping the straw. You just grabbed one too many copy and paste fear mongering post from the party master.

I will side with you entirely that political parties are machines which do whatever to keep the machine and personal power wheels turning.

Join me, lose the team worship, despise each party for what you disagree with and support what you do. You're better than these logic leaps of desperation.

There is not a single point I've made that you can dispute.

Everything I post is linked, sourced, and documented.

Why would I ever......ever....'join' a dunce who clearly never thinks, reads, or is able to incorporate facts into their worldview.


I'd be more than happy to provide a syllabus that would, as the etymology of 'education' states....lead you out of ignorance.

Just say the word.

 

[Darkwind]

“During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

And the stats prove Lemon correct. Deal with the truth for once in your worthless life.

So, being a racist is okay as long as you can provide stats that back up your claim?

No race is only male, so Lemon was not being racist,

He did not say men. He said 'white men'.

 

[Toronado3800]

And then this PoliticalChic poster puts a post up saying the party that is anti-black as you claimed previously is anti-white.

So there, use her post against yours!

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New Your Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

"Curious, who are the D's pro then?"

You dunce.....any groups that will increase their power.



The Democrats:
Power hungry, immoral reprobates.


Hispanics are now 17% while blacks only 13%......guess who the Dems are for????


Oh....and for felons getting the vote.....Islamists.....Illegal aliens....and, of course, those who don't read and don't think,...you.

The D's are not tossing the 60% white vote and the 13% black vote to get the 17% Hispanic vote.

Quit grasping the straw. You just grabbed one too many copy and paste fear mongering post from the party master.

I will side with you entirely that political parties are machines which do whatever to keep the machine and personal power wheels turning.

Join me, lose the team worship, despise each party for what you disagree with and support what you do. You're better than these logic leaps of desperation.

There is not a single point I've made that you can dispute.

Everything I post is linked, sourced, and documented.

Why would I ever......ever....'join' a dunce who clearly never thinks, reads, or is able to incorporate facts into their worldview.


I'd be more than happy to provide a syllabus that would, as the etymology of 'education' states....lead you out of ignorance.

Just say the word.

The anti blacks are anti white so they can get 17% of the vote in the next election......

 

[PoliticalChic]

I didn't merely say that "the party that is anti-black ... is anti-white".....I proved it.


The Democrats will do anything...ANYTHING....to increase their power.

They have always been anti-black....and have now added anti-white to their repertoire...

Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

I can show the same view in New Your Democrats now.....just challenge me.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

"Curious, who are the D's pro then?"

You dunce.....any groups that will increase their power.



The Democrats:
Power hungry, immoral reprobates.


Hispanics are now 17% while blacks only 13%......guess who the Dems are for????


Oh....and for felons getting the vote.....Islamists.....Illegal aliens....and, of course, those who don't read and don't think,...you.

The D's are not tossing the 60% white vote and the 13% black vote to get the 17% Hispanic vote.

Quit grasping the straw. You just grabbed one too many copy and paste fear mongering post from the party master.

I will side with you entirely that political parties are machines which do whatever to keep the machine and personal power wheels turning.

Join me, lose the team worship, despise each party for what you disagree with and support what you do. You're better than these logic leaps of desperation.

There is not a single point I've made that you can dispute.

Everything I post is linked, sourced, and documented.

Why would I ever......ever....'join' a dunce who clearly never thinks, reads, or is able to incorporate facts into their worldview.


I'd be more than happy to provide a syllabus that would, as the etymology of 'education' states....lead you out of ignorance.

Just say the word.

The anti blacks are anti white so they can get 17% of the vote in the next election......

I'd be more than happy to provide a syllabus that would, as the etymology of 'education' states....lead you out of ignorance.

Just say the word.

 

[dudmuck]

Ok. So you believe the party that is anti-black is anti-white also. Got it.

America Divided: It Starts With the Democratic Party

Use my longer term view to help. Perhaps you mean the party that was previously the anti-black party is now the anti-white party? Like it has changed? That would be a defensible position.

"Curious, who are the D's pro then?"

You dunce.....any groups that will increase their power.



The Democrats:
Power hungry, immoral reprobates.


Hispanics are now 17% while blacks only 13%......guess who the Dems are for????


Oh....and for felons getting the vote.....Islamists.....Illegal aliens....and, of course, those who don't read and don't think,...you.

The D's are not tossing the 60% white vote and the 13% black vote to get the 17% Hispanic vote.

Quit grasping the straw. You just grabbed one too many copy and paste fear mongering post from the party master.

I will side with you entirely that political parties are machines which do whatever to keep the machine and personal power wheels turning.

Join me, lose the team worship, despise each party for what you disagree with and support what you do. You're better than these logic leaps of desperation.

There is not a single point I've made that you can dispute.

Everything I post is linked, sourced, and documented.

Why would I ever......ever....'join' a dunce who clearly never thinks, reads, or is able to incorporate facts into their worldview.


I'd be more than happy to provide a syllabus that would, as the etymology of 'education' states....lead you out of ignorance.

Just say the word.

The anti blacks are anti white so they can get 17% of the vote in the next election......

I'd be more than happy to provide a syllabus that would, as the etymology of 'education' states....lead you out of ignorance.

Just say the word.

The basic truth on America Divided is thats the way fox news wants it, and that was 8 years ago.
If democrats were the racist ones, why is Trump a republican? Trump said black people are too stupid to vote for him.
That Luis Bracamontes ad that just came out hightlights the new low we've sunk to.