BolshevikHunter
Rookie
- Banned
- #41
check out the show Locked up Abroad. ~BH
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Constitution is supreme. States are obligated to follow the treaties entered into by the Federal government.
It's surprising you don't know that. (Well not really)
Just out of curiosity, does the president have the authority to issue a stay of execution?
Just out of curiosity, does the president have the authority to issue a stay of execution?
Just out of curiosity, does the president have the authority to issue a stay of execution?
In Texas?
Just out of curiosity, does the president have the authority to issue a stay of execution?
In Texas?
In the USA.
He certainly has the authority to issue a presidential pardon which would stop any execution. Of course he wouldn't pardon a murdering rapist (I hope). But it would be interesting to know if he could simply issue an executive order of some kind to stop the execution.
Just out of curiosity, does the president have the authority to issue a stay of execution?
The Constitution is supreme. States are obligated to follow the treaties entered into by the Federal government.
It's surprising you don't know that. (Well not really)
"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that the treaty was not binding on the states and that the president does not have the authority to order states to review cases of the then 51 foreign nationals on death row in the U.S."
Read more: White House Seeks Delay of Mexican Man's Execution as Supreme Court Mulls Case - FoxNews.com
No one is trying to "spare" him. They are just trying to follow procedure.
The Constitution is supreme. States are obligated to follow the treaties entered into by the Federal government.
It's surprising you don't know that. (Well not really)
I don't know the facts of the case, but the OP clearly referenced a UN Treaty, not a US Treaty. Could that be the difference?
Hmm..not sure..but clearly the President sees a legal issue here..and clearly there are some reciprocity issues. As a great many Americans travel in Mexico each year..personally I wouldn't want that to become a problem to them if they face legal challenges in that country.
Notice to all Americans traveling in Mexico: Do not rape and murder any 16 year old girls.
Thank you.
When my Dad was in Mexico, while driving, another car hit his car. The guy who hit my dad's car, did it for insurance purposes..and accused my Dad, a professional race car driver, of causing the accident. After spending a night in jail my Father was allowed to contact the embassy and they contacted his father who was an ambassador at the time.
Who was able to secure the release of my father with all charges dropped.
It's an interesting states rights issue as well as a legal one. Humberto Garcia has been on Texas death row since 1994 when he was convicted of raping and killing a woman. He is a Mexican national and the president and the Secretary 'O State are citing a UN Treaty in order to try to spare his life. Governor Perry is determined to let the execution go through. Will president Barry call out the Troops to save this murderer's life and cause another Alamo standoff? The Feds don't have a case. The Supreme Court already ruled in a similar case in 2008 that states are not obligated to comply with UN treaties.