- Thread starter
- #41
that's proof?
cuz dick cheney says so?
should i post Bush saying the opposite, and call that "proof" ?
idiot
Why would the Vice President say it in 2006 while he was VP if it was a lie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
that's proof?
cuz dick cheney says so?
should i post Bush saying the opposite, and call that "proof" ?
idiot
Oh thats right Bush was President.
Two thoughts: a) oh, brother; b) wouldnt it be on GWB that his failed policies made him so unpopular? Politics is capricious, cruel, and unfair deal with it; dont try to blame others for the failings of politicians you support.
You do realize that your link Complete 911 Timeline: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed
states over and over and over the ways Bin Laden was involved in 9/11 right? Fucking clown.
All of al quada was involved, there were summits, there were approvals, etc.
and who was al quada's #1?
Idiot.
you don't even vet your own links.
your statement that there's PROOF that bin laden had nothing to do with 9/11....is disproven by your OWN LINK, YOU FUCKING DUMB FUCK.
2001, bin Laden apparently pressures Khalid Shaikh Mohammed for an attack date earlier than 9/11. According to information obtained from the 9/11 Commission (apparently based on a prison interrogation of Mohammed), bin Laden first requests an attack date of May 12, 2001, the seven-month anniversary of the USS Cole bombing. Then, when bin Laden learns from the media that Israels Prime Minister Ariel Sharon would be visiting the White House in June or July 2001, he attempts once more to accelerate the operation to coincide with his visit. [9/11 Commission, 6/16/2004] The surge of warnings around this time could be related to these original preparations. By mid-July, US intelligence will learn of this delay (see July 13, 2001).
he misspoke you fucking moron. they were talking about Saddam Hussein. wow, you're such a liar.
he misspoke you fucking moron. they were talking about Saddam Hussein. wow, you're such a liar.
If he misspoke why wasn't Ben Laden wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks?
You're a scumbag of the highest order. That's basically it. Have a nice day.
he misspoke you fucking moron. they were talking about Saddam Hussein. wow, you're such a liar.
If he misspoke why wasn't Ben Laden wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks?
he was, dipshit, as it says right on his poster that he's wanted as a suspect in other terrorist attacks around the world...
and also FROM YOUR OTHER LINK WHICH SAYS....
that HE gave the go mahead for 9/11, to khalik.
how do you sleep at night knowing how blatantly dishonest you really are? go to hell, dude.
he misspoke you fucking moron. they were talking about Saddam Hussein. wow, you're such a liar.
If he misspoke why wasn't Ben Laden wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks?
he was, dipshit, as it says right on his poster that he's wanted as a suspect in other terrorist attacks around the world...
If he misspoke why wasn't Ben Laden wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks?
he was, dipshit, as it says right on his poster that he's wanted as a suspect in other terrorist attacks around the world...
and also FROM YOUR OTHER LINK WHICH SAYS....
that HE gave the go mahead for 9/11, to khalik.
how do you sleep at night knowing how blatantly dishonest you really are? go to hell, dude.
If he was wanted for the attacks on the world trade center the poster would not have been so generic. It would have stated the fact. It didn't
The entire interview you're citing re: Cheney was the discussion of whether or not Saddam and Iraq were involved on 9/11, and you take his misspeak as (as you put it, "proof") that bin laden had nothing to do with 9/11.
you must have a really fun life being that retarded.
If he misspoke why wasn't Ben Laden wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks?
he was, dipshit, as it says right on his poster that he's wanted as a suspect in other terrorist attacks around the world...
'Other attacks' =/= '9/11
Think: 'nonspecified'
that's proof?
cuz dick cheney says so?
should i post Bush saying the opposite, and call that "proof" ?
idiot
Why would the Vice President say it in 2006 while he was VP if it was a lie?