Terrorism is not a threat to our survival.

[xen]

So is that a no?

You don't really want to have a conversation?

What was the question? sure we can conversate, as long as ya'll stop insulting my intelligence, morality, etc . thaaanks.

 

[Zhukov]

What was the question?

Alright, all compliments aside, are you going to address the threat of biological weapons, Jefferson's response to attacks in his own age, or the fact that we are and have been at a state of war with terrorist elements of the Middle East for a quarter century now, or should I just stop checking on this thread?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/showpost.php?p=332701&postcount=250

as long as ya'll stop insulting my intelligence, morality, etc

I won't make any promises, but I also don't recall doing that.

Saying something you wrote is colossally stupid isn't insulting your intelligence, by the way.

But it does beg another question (one you can answer after you've addressed the original matter) and that is: Is refering to conservatives as Nazis polite?

 

[xen]

ZHUK - are you going to address the threat of biological weapons, Jefferson's response to attacks in his own age, or the fact that we are and have been at a state of war with terrorist elements of the Middle East for a quarter century now, or should I just stop checking on this thread?

Whatever you want, ill address.. Ya though, we've been at 'war' with them for a damn long time. This only strengthens my argument that these types of wars can go on forever if you allow them to.

Is refering to conservatives as Nazis polite?

When I say the 4th reich, I don't consider them to be nazis.
Only the same entity that enables them, money/power.
Their tactics are just so similar to me, seems like its in the same string of reichs.

 

[Zhukov]

Whatever you want, ill address..

Ok, now I am getting mightily close to insulting your intelligence, nay calling into question the extent of it. Stop saying you'll address those points, and address them.

Once you've done that...

seems like its in the same string of reichs.

...I'll school you on your staggering ignorance of history and demonstrate your obvious dishonesty about the true intent of your own statements.

 

[no1tovote4]

Whatever you want, ill address.. Ya though, we've been at 'war' with them for a damn long time. This only strengthens my argument that these types of wars can go on forever if you allow them to.




When I say the 4th reich, I don't consider them to be nazis.
Only the same entity that enables them, money/power.
Their tactics are just so similar to me, seems like its in the same string of reichs.

First of all, Bush is no Conservative. Saying so doesn't make it so and we can tell by his spending efforts. Therefore judging all Conservatives to be of the same "reich" is simply disingenuous and equating any group to those who would systematically kill a race of beings deemed less worthy than they is not just rude and unjustified, but directly antagonistic and reason for the rift in the nation. Either you are part of the solution or you are part of the problem, it appears you have made your choice.

 

[xen]

...I'll school you on .... history and demonstrate your obvious dishonesty about the true intent of your own statements.

Okay, hehehe, ayn rand. maybe ill need to teach you about the robber barons.

First of all, Bush is no Conservative.
Saying so doesn't make it so and we can tell by his spending efforts. reaganomics! Therefore judging all Conservatives to be of the same "reich" is simply disingenuous

Correct Sir.

and equating any group to those who would systematically kill a race of beings deemed less worthy than they is not just rude and unjustified,

Hey dont blame me Bush admin is from the same ilk!

.. but directly antagonistic and reason for the rift in the nation.

Well, heheh, i dont think its the REASON..Im sure i could possibly fuel some flames. Both sides do it though. you know that, everyone does..Would be good for me to stop bunching everyone together, suppose everyone could work on this though. Just like everyone here thinks im part of this democrat liberal party, I dont even like them.

Either you are part of the solution or you are part of the problem, it appears you have made your choice.

Sorry it must be very uncomfortable to be in such a black and white world. That sort of phrase could be unamerican. does not go with my sig thats for sure.
Also, don't be like the republican party, equating the terrorists with the american left. Its just wrong.

 

[no1tovote4]

Well, heheh, i dont think its the REASON..Im sure i could possibly fuel some flames. Both sides do it though. you know that, everyone does..Would be good for me to stop bunching everyone together, suppose everyone could work on this though. Just like everyone here thinks im part of this democrat liberal party, I dont even like them.

Read it again, I said reason not "the reason".

Two wrongs do not make it right. Like I said, you can be part of the problem or part of the solution, it was to either invite you to those who would be part of the solution or to know that you have consciously made the choice to be part of the problem.

I honestly think that you are part of the Communist Party, not of the Democrat Party at this point.

Sorry it must be very uncomfortable to be in such a black and white world. That sort of phrase could be unamerican. does not go with my sig thats for sure.
Also, don't be like the republican party, equating the terrorists with the american left. Its just wrong.

So you are saying you want to be part of the solution at the same time you would want to be part of the problem? Once you are a portion of those creating the problem you are no longer part of the solution, in this case the grey area is not there. Lead, follow, or get out of the fricking way! As I stated before, you have made your choice.

Also, when have I ever equated the American Left with terrorists? The statement was not about terrorism but about the rift widening between the sides of the political aisle that is made larger by such stereotyping and acidic language as you had used in the post in question.

 

[xen]

Wow you really are in black and white world, sorry dude.

Now you believe im a communist? hahahah!~thats just...silly. You know the communists systematically killed off a whole portion of their population! what'er you tryin to do?

the rest of what you said does not make sense.

you have made your choice.

Is this a threat?

 

[no1tovote4]

Wow you really are in black and white world, sorry dude.

Now you believe im a communist? hahahah!~thats just...silly. You know the communists systematically killed off a whole portion of their population! what'er you tryin to do?

the rest of what you said does not make sense.


Is this a threat?

Threat? For what? You are simply being disingenuous.

The Socialists killed their population there has never been a true Communist Government. However the Communist Party in the US has never killed a large portion of their population, they haven't had that kind of power here. Also the whole communist thing was simply a theory...

I only mention the "part of the problem" thing because you choose to use acidic rhetoric that will drive a wedge deeper rather than resolve differences and allow for compromise.

 

[xen]

rather than acidic rhetoric that will drive a wedge deeper resolve differences and allow for compromise.

heh, you can say the same for some of these board members!

 

[no1tovote4]

heh, you can say the same for some of these board members!

Yes, you can. But once again, two wrongs only make two people twice as wrong.