Terrorism and religious war.

I think nowdays terrorism is a religious war


  • Total voters
    12

Daniyel

Gold Member
Jul 9, 2014
4,715
892
245
LA
Hello

As we know it gets obvious that (nearly) all the terrorism we find about today seeking a religious gain and this is their main cause.

From Hamas, el Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Taliban, and further organizations, I believe the other terms claimed by these organizations, it can be wrapped with pretty words like "self determination" of IS, or "liberation of Palestine" by Hamas, and so on, but in the end its all about religious war of ruthless Islamic radicals.

Please try stick to the board rules.
 
It's religious as these extremists believe they are following the rulings of the Koran to the letter and are seeking eventual world domination of the non-believers.

In short what you are saying is correct.
 
I totally agree. ... :cool:

Israel's multiple wars to spread zionist jews throughout the Middle East by terrorism is based on Judaism's long term goal to enslave the regions goyim.
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.
 
I totally agree. ... :cool:

Israel's multiple wars to spread zionist jews throughout the Middle East by terrorism is based on Judaism's long term goal to enslave the regions goyim.




So Israel started the religious wars in Ethiopia, Darfur, Somalia, Sudan and the Philippines did they. Or was it islam following the commands in the koran
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.
This is why they called 'religious wars '
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.
This is why they called 'religious wars '

But just because they say they are fighting in the name of God, doesn't mean God had a thing to do with it, its an excuse they us. They us
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.
This is why they called 'religious wars '
They are using God as an excuse. People use God for lots of things.
 
Hello

As we know it gets obvious that (nearly) all the terrorism we find about today seeking a religious gain and this is their main cause.

From Hamas, el Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Taliban, and further organizations, I believe the other terms claimed by these organizations, it can be wrapped with pretty words like "self determination" of IS, or "liberation of Palestine" by Hamas, and so on, but in the end its all about religious war of ruthless Islamic radicals.

Please try stick to the board rules.

Couldn't help but notice you're only discussing terrorism wrought by people who claim to be Muslim. Little more involved than just that you realize? The impression that a disproportionate number of terrorist attacks are carried out by those claiming to be Muslim is due in large part to a concerted effort by conservatives and right-wing parties needing to scapegoat someone, and being predominantly Christian, they're gonna target whoever isn't. Their choice of scapegoat then is simply a matter of who isn't on their side anyway: statistically, Jews carried out more terrorist attacks than Muslims (7% vs 6%) but without Jewish support, there would be no American right-wing so they can't go blaming the Jews (besides, it's been done, and no one wants the comparison to the Nazis.) Can't blame Christians since that's their own side. Even though over 80% of terrorism is perpetuated by Christians (or rather, those who claim to be Christians.) So who's left? Well, as yet there's no 'log cabin Muslim' wing of the GOP so blame them, they're not sitting here listening to us anyway.

It's the same trick theologians use at services when they blame things on homosexuals. Probably not a lot of out-homosexuals sitting in church on Sundays so they make a good scapegoat. But even if adulterers and Sabbath-breakers account for more 'sinners' since they're sitting right there wondering how much to tithe, best not to upset them. So blame the group or groups that aren't represented (and tithing.)

Same logic with portraying Muslims as disproportionately terrorists. No US political party lives or dies with Muslim participation so if you need to scapegoat someone they're as good as anyone. Plus, the fact that they usually come from a region where we need to secure a constant flow of oil, portraying them as the Bad Guys helps when ever you wanna invade and steal more oil, or make some dictator the US installed a generation ago suddenly look bad and so be replaced by a more cooperative one.

The US media helps by covering whatever will get the best ratings. And since fires and things blowing up is always the highest rated, since terrorists seem to like blowing things up as opposed to Americans with our love of gunplay and shooting people, there's a virtually never-ending stream of footage showing the latest terrorist-incident. Of course, footage of schoolkids running as SRT teams move in to handle the latest shooting incident shows, that's good tv too. But of course no one ever portrays that as an act of Christian terrorism. Yet when it happens in an Arab country, that's usually the headline, "Muslim terrorists invade UN school.'
 
I totally agree. ... :cool:

Israel's multiple wars to spread zionist jews throughout the Middle East by terrorism is based on Judaism's long term goal to enslave the regions goyim.
So Israel started the religious wars in Ethiopia, Darfur, Somalia, Sudan and the Philippines did they. Or was it islam following the commands in the koran
I said in the Middle East region you freakin nitwit.

Damn you are dumb........ :cool:
 
Hello

As we know it gets obvious that (nearly) all the terrorism we find about today seeking a religious gain and this is their main cause.

From Hamas, el Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Taliban, and further organizations, I believe the other terms claimed by these organizations, it can be wrapped with pretty words like "self determination" of IS, or "liberation of Palestine" by Hamas, and so on, but in the end its all about religious war of ruthless Islamic radicals.

Please try stick to the board rules.

Couldn't help but notice you're only discussing terrorism wrought by people who claim to be Muslim. Little more involved than just that you realize? The impression that a disproportionate number of terrorist attacks are carried out by those claiming to be Muslim is due in large part to a concerted effort by conservatives and right-wing parties needing to scapegoat someone, and being predominantly Christian, they're gonna target whoever isn't. Their choice of scapegoat then is simply a matter of who isn't on their side anyway: statistically, Jews carried out more terrorist attacks than Muslims (7% vs 6%) but without Jewish support, there would be no American right-wing so they can't go blaming the Jews (besides, it's been done, and no one wants the comparison to the Nazis.) Can't blame Christians since that's their own side. Even though over 80% of terrorism is perpetuated by Christians (or rather, those who claim to be Christians.) So who's left? Well, as yet there's no 'log cabin Muslim' wing of the GOP so blame them, they're not sitting here listening to us anyway.

It's the same trick theologians use at services when they blame things on homosexuals. Probably not a lot of out-homosexuals sitting in church on Sundays so they make a good scapegoat. But even if adulterers and Sabbath-breakers account for more 'sinners' since they're sitting right there wondering how much to tithe, best not to upset them. So blame the group or groups that aren't represented (and tithing.)

Same logic with portraying Muslims as disproportionately terrorists. No US political party lives or dies with Muslim participation so if you need to scapegoat someone they're as good as anyone. Plus, the fact that they usually come from a region where we need to secure a constant flow of oil, portraying them as the Bad Guys helps when ever you wanna invade and steal more oil, or make some dictator the US installed a generation ago suddenly look bad and so be replaced by a more cooperative one.

The US media helps by covering whatever will get the best ratings. And since fires and things blowing up is always the highest rated, since terrorists seem to like blowing things up as opposed to Americans with our love of gunplay and shooting people, there's a virtually never-ending stream of footage showing the latest terrorist-incident. Of course, footage of schoolkids running as SRT teams move in to handle the latest shooting incident shows, that's good tv too. But of course no one ever portrays that as an act of Christian terrorism. Yet when it happens in an Arab country, that's usually the headline, "Muslim terrorists invade UN school.'
Most of the terrorism today is carried by Muslim radicals, and most of the resources are invested on it, anyhow you present it, statistically most of the foiled attempts were also done by Muslim radicals, and by that I'm talking about Religious Terrorism, it is true however many religious terrorism groups are not Muslim radicals but be honest, which of the religious terrorism groups in the middle east are not Muslim?
Open any news outlet and show me where the so called religious (not racial) terrorism events are not Muslims, or if they are not involved.
Go ahead.
 
I disagree.
Most terrorism is cash or political based, but goes unreported.
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.



So you are saying that you know better than the people fighting the wars and invoking the name of thier god when doing so. As far as they are concerned the war is holy and they have the blessing of their religious leaders to take up the banner of war for the glory of islam.
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.
This is why they called 'religious wars '

But just because they say they are fighting in the name of God, doesn't mean God had a thing to do with it, its an excuse they us. They us
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.




Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.
This is why they called 'religious wars '
They are using God as an excuse. People use God for lots of things.




In reality they don't need any excuse as it is inbuilt in their culture to engage in war and violence. But the fact still stands that as far as they are concerned they are fighting a religious war to spread their version of the Islamic religion.
 
I'll explain.
How many drone strikes have you read about lately?
These strikes are against targets in countries you aren't at war with, and commonly kill civilians, not the intended targets, causing terror in the populations they attack.

Most US drone strikes in Pakistan attack houses The Bureau of Investigative Journalism

When you don't know what the CIA are up to, they feel free to murder anyone they fancy.

Get the data Drone wars The Bureau of Investigative Journalism

Pakistan 2004–2014
CIA Drone Strikes

Total strikes: 390
Obama strikes: 339
Total killed: 2,347-3,792
Civilians killed: 416-957
Children killed: 168-202Injured: 1,103-1,658

When you read the reports, most are "suspected" targets.
And that's only one country,the CIA are engaged in terror attacks in many countries.
 
Well let's see, using ISIS as our reference point, if they're terrorists who in the past is most like them? Christian crusaders perhaps travelling all the way to Israel trying to take over Jerusalem? If we're going to condemn ISIS now, then if interested in being consistent and unbiased, we have to retroactively condemn Christians because they did the exact same thing. A few times.
 
Hello

As we know it gets obvious that (nearly) all the terrorism we find about today seeking a religious gain and this is their main cause.

From Hamas, el Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Islamic Jihad, Taliban, and further organizations, I believe the other terms claimed by these organizations, it can be wrapped with pretty words like "self determination" of IS, or "liberation of Palestine" by Hamas, and so on, but in the end its all about religious war of ruthless Islamic radicals.

Please try stick to the board rules.

Couldn't help but notice you're only discussing terrorism wrought by people who claim to be Muslim. Little more involved than just that you realize? The impression that a disproportionate number of terrorist attacks are carried out by those claiming to be Muslim is due in large part to a concerted effort by conservatives and right-wing parties needing to scapegoat someone, and being predominantly Christian, they're gonna target whoever isn't. Their choice of scapegoat then is simply a matter of who isn't on their side anyway: statistically, Jews carried out more terrorist attacks than Muslims (7% vs 6%) but without Jewish support, there would be no American right-wing so they can't go blaming the Jews (besides, it's been done, and no one wants the comparison to the Nazis.) Can't blame Christians since that's their own side. Even though over 80% of terrorism is perpetuated by Christians (or rather, those who claim to be Christians.) So who's left? Well, as yet there's no 'log cabin Muslim' wing of the GOP so blame them, they're not sitting here listening to us anyway.

It's the same trick theologians use at services when they blame things on homosexuals. Probably not a lot of out-homosexuals sitting in church on Sundays so they make a good scapegoat. But even if adulterers and Sabbath-breakers account for more 'sinners' since they're sitting right there wondering how much to tithe, best not to upset them. So blame the group or groups that aren't represented (and tithing.)

Same logic with portraying Muslims as disproportionately terrorists. No US political party lives or dies with Muslim participation so if you need to scapegoat someone they're as good as anyone. Plus, the fact that they usually come from a region where we need to secure a constant flow of oil, portraying them as the Bad Guys helps when ever you wanna invade and steal more oil, or make some dictator the US installed a generation ago suddenly look bad and so be replaced by a more cooperative one.

The US media helps by covering whatever will get the best ratings. And since fires and things blowing up is always the highest rated, since terrorists seem to like blowing things up as opposed to Americans with our love of gunplay and shooting people, there's a virtually never-ending stream of footage showing the latest terrorist-incident. Of course, footage of schoolkids running as SRT teams move in to handle the latest shooting incident shows, that's good tv too. But of course no one ever portrays that as an act of Christian terrorism. Yet when it happens in an Arab country, that's usually the headline, "Muslim terrorists invade UN school.'



So you are saying that Israel was responsible for 7% of the terrorism in India, Sudan, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Phillipines, Bali, Russian, Britain and America. Or are you just cherry picking one day in history that supports your POV. Care to explain the Hebron TERRORIST massacre for starters and ending with the hamas terrorist attacks on Israeli children ?
 
Not all, most is due to power and money and land .. Some is radical religious beliefs.

dollar.jpg





Listen to the ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS and you will hear they are fighting for allah and are following his commands. These commands include the acquisition of all the worlds land and all the worlds wealth


So they say, doesn't make it so. A lot of wars have been fought in the Name of God.



So you are saying that you know better than the people fighting the wars and invoking the name of thier god when doing so. As far as they are concerned the war is holy and they have the blessing of their religious leaders to take up the banner of war for the glory of islam.
 
Well let's see, using ISIS as our reference point, if they're terrorists who in the past is most like them? Christian crusaders perhaps travelling all the way to Israel trying to take over Jerusalem? If we're going to condemn ISIS now, then if interested in being consistent and unbiased, we have to retroactively condemn Christians because they did the exact same thing. A few times.
Religious wars are connected directly to Religious Terrorism, this is exactly my point in this thread.
But you can notice the difference between the Crusaders and our time Religious wars, I'm talking about our times, slipping away to history is indeed necessary but you cannot include the Crusaders as for 'Our time'
 

Forum List

Back
Top