Terral's Challenge To Official 9/11 Govt Conspiracy Theory Stooges

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Terral, Feb 1, 2010.

  1. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +91
    Greetings to All:

    Mr. Fizz, CandyCorn, Ollie, Gamolon, DiveCon, Trojan and many other USMB members run around this place in complete support of Govt Cover Story LIES, but NONE of them have bothered to start 'their' 9/11 Topic laying out 'their' evidence in this Conspiracy Theories Forum. My Topic on "What Really Happened On 9/11" is here. These Official Cover Story Stooges want these readers to believe that this is a crashed 100-ton Jetliner:

    My Flight 93 Topic:

    [​IMG]

    All I see in the photograph is a man walking in the empty hole from our right to our left in a dark shirt and light-colored pair of pants. This video clip (here) shows the empty hole from this U.S. Geological Survey Photograph dated April 20, 1994 (here), but these Govt Cover Story Stooges insist we are all looking at a crashed 100-ton Jetliner anyway! The real Flight 93 and Flight 175 landed in Cleveland on 9/11 (story)! I challenge everyone here believing the Official Cover Story LIES to post 'their' evidence that Flight 93 crashed in this empty Shanksville field ...

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whrE1mXreas"]Debunk This!!![/ame]

    ... OR to admit the Govt is LYING. The Govt Documentation Proves 9/11 Was An Inside Job (my Topic).

    My Pentagon Topic:

    [​IMG]

    These Official Govt Cover Story Stooges say this empty hole is yet another crashed 100-ton Jetliner (AA77), when we are looking at the aftermath of a missile strike. I want to see 'their' evidence saying a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed here to 'debunk' these Military and Aviation Experts all saying that ..

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTJehfQkuyE"]No 100-Ton Jetliner Crashed Into The Pentagon[/ame]

    My WTC-7 Controlled Demolition Topic:

    These Govt Stooges say this ...

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo"]WTC-7 CD Implosion[/ame]

    ... is a video of WTC-7 collapsing from building fires and WTC-1 debris. I want to see 'their' WTC-7 Topic using 'their' so-called 'Building Fires Did It' Evidence to support the Official Govt Conspiracy Theory!

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIx2CVRxRXg"]This Short Video Debunks The Official Cover Story![/ame]

    Good Luck, because you all need it,

    Terral

    ...
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2010
  2. 9/11 inside job
    Offline

    9/11 inside job VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    11,345
    Thanks Received:
    316
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +364
    Dont know why you even bother with them Terral since you have posted that pic hundreds of times before in the past only to watch them run off with their tails between their legs in denial that they cant admit the government is lying.Also they have never taken up my challenge to watch these 47 videos here and try to debunk even ONE of them proving they have no interest in the truth.
    Canada 9/11 Truth - Videos they also run off with their tails between their legs then as well and never talk about them since they know they cant debunk them.

    They continue to make themselves look like prized idiots ignoring what hundreds of architects and engineers say not to mention demolition experts,first responders,firemen,the worlds renown scientists from around the world,pilots,top military officers say and ONLY listen to waht the corporate controlled media and government agencys say even though they have a history of never reporting truth or facts.lol
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    also look at the insane crap they came up with when confronted with THESE facts that Creative Dreams posted in his threads.Since it doesnt go along with their views,they just make up the most laughable crap all the time.

    The very people on the 9/11 Commission Report say it is a fraud and cover-up

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The entire 9/11 Commission Report is a farse and nothing but a cover-up, as stated by the people directly involved with the 9/11 Commission Report. They were stonewalled from the FACTS and EVIDENCE by the Whitehouse and top CIA. They state they and ended up with a report completely void of ANY facts.

    Many anti-truthers make the claim that the Commission Report did not get any "facts" wrong so there's nothing to contest...but the FACT of the matter is the 9/11 Commission Report is VOID OF ANY FACTS.
    .......So what could they get wrong if all the FACTS and EVIDENCE were hidden from them?.......

    Here are some disturbing statements from the very people involved in the 9/11 Commission Report and it is beyond me why a few people post full time on many message boards to defend and sway people from asking for a new investigation....



    The following paragraph is very compelling so I pasted it at the top...

    Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham:... "A U.S. government informant was the landlord to two of the hijackers for over a year, but the White House refused to let the 9/11 inquiry interview him."

    Here is a news link on it...
    Hijackers Lived With FBI Informant - CBS News



    9/11 COMMISSIONERS

    Co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton:... "The CIA and the White House obstructed our investigation".

    Co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also said:... "The 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people."

    Co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

    9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton:... "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right, the Commission was set up to fail, the people should keep asking questions about 9/11, the 9/11 debate should continue."

    9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey:... "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version, we didn't have access."

    9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer:... "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting."

    9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up".

    9/11 Commissioner John Lehman:... “We purposely put together a staff that had – in a way - conflicts of interest".

    Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission John Farmer who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry:... "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."


    CONGRESS

    Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham:... "A U.S. government informant was the landlord to two of the hijackers for over a year, but the White House refused to let the 9/11 inquiry interview him."
    Hijackers Lived With FBI Informant - CBS News

    U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy:... "The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?"

    Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states:... "We see the 9/11 investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"

    Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich:... "We aren't being told the truth about 9/11."

    Democratic Senator Mike Gravel:... "I support a new 9/11 investigation, we don't know the truth about 9/11."


    Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee:..."A new 9/11 investigation is needed."


    U.S. Democratic Congressman Dan Hamburg:..."The U.S. government assisted in the 9/11 attacks, I think there was a lot of help from the inside."

    U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon:..."The U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11. I am open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job."
    __________________
    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered".......Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Last edited by creativedreams; 12-21-2009 at 06:12 PM.


    The Following User Says Thank You to creativedreams For This Useful Post: Remove Your Thanks
    9/11 inside job (12-23-2009)


    World Renowned Scientist Says Official Story For 9/11 is a Fraud

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Official Explanation for 9/11 is a Fraud


    World renowned scientist, Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., has severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation, “I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken.”


    Lynn Margulis, PhD




    One of America’s most prominent scientists, Dr. Margulis is Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geo-sciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983 and served as Chairman of the Academy’s Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution. In 1999, President Bill Clinton presented Dr. Margulis with the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement, "for her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."

    In her statement on PatriotsQuestion911.com, Dr. Margulis referred to 9/11 as “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”. She compared 9/11 to several self-inflicted attacks that had been used in the past to arouse people’s fear and hatred and justify war, including the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, the Reichstag Fire, and Operation Himmler, which Germany used to justify the invasion of Poland, the trigger for World War II.

    In her statement, Dr. Margulis cites “the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11” as a useful source of information and analysis of problems with the official account of 9/11. She specifically lauded The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, “which provides overwhelming evidence that the official story is contradictory, incomplete, and unbelievable.”
    Internationally acclaimed for her ground-breaking scientific work, Dr. Margulis is an elected member of The World Academy of Art and Science, an organization of 500 of the world’s leading thinkers, chosen for eminence in art, the natural and social sciences, and the humanities. And in 2006, she was selected as one of “The 20th Century's 100 Most Important Inspirational Leaders” by the editors of Resurgence magazine.

    Dr. Margulis’ full statement can be read at PatriotsQuestion911.com. More information about Dr. Margulis’ career can be found at Sciencewriters.

    Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

    Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
    __________________
    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered".......Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2010
  3. 9/11 inside job
    Offline

    9/11 inside job VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    11,345
    Thanks Received:
    316
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +364
    Military, Government, Architects, Engineers, Scientists, Demolition experts, DON'T believe 9/11 story

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First I would like to say the BOTH my brothers are high ranking military officers...

    I have owned a steel framing construction company for over 10yrs...

    This is why I question 9/11 and want a new and independent investigation...

    I am going to show well documented statements from many prominent people with disturbing things to say about 9/11....

    Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

    Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.
    Video interview 6/28/09:

    General Stubblebine: I am Major General Albert Stubblebine. I am retired Army Major-General. In my last assignment -- my last command -- I was responsible for all of the Army's strategic intelligence forces around the world. I had responsibility for the Signals Intelligence, Photo Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, Human Intelligence. They all belonged to me, in my last assignment. …

    I was supposed to find out what the enemy was doing, before the enemy did it so that we could take action against the enemy. That's Intelligence, OK, before the fact. So, we always -- always -- rely not on a single piece of data, before we make a statement, but on multiple and the more pieces of data that you have that correlate, the better you know exactly what is going on. …

    So I have had a lot of experience looking at photographs. I have looked at many, many different kinds of photographs, from many, many different platforms on many, many different countries, around the world.

    Interviewer: OK. So on September the 11th, in 2001, what hit the Pentagon?

    General Stubblebine: I don't know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not an airplane.

    Interviewer: What made you believe that?

    General Stubblebine: Well, for one thing, if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks. So where were they? Did this vessel -- vehicle, or whatever it was -- have wings? Apparently not, because if it had had wings, they would have made marks on the side of the Pentagon.

    One person counteracted my theory, and said, "Oh, you've got it all wrong. And the reason that it's wrong is that as the airplane came across, one wing tipped down and hit the ground and broke off." I said, "Fine, that's possible, one wing could have broken off." But if I understand airplanes correctly, most airplanes have two wings. I haven't met an airplane with only one wing. So where was the mark for the second wing? OK, one broke off -- there should have been a mark for the second wing. I could not find that in any of the photographs that I've analyzed. Now I've been very careful to not say what went in there. Why? Because you don't have that evidence. …

    I did -- I've never believed that it was an airplane since I've looked at the photographs. Up until the time I looked at the photographs, I accepted what was being said. After I looked at it -- NO WAY! …

    We pride ourselves with the "free press." I do not believe the "free press" is free any more. It's very expensive. It's very expensive. And the press is saying what they have been told to say about this.

    Now, do I have proof of that? No. But I believe that what is being -- what certainly the -- the stories that were told -- all about 9/11 were false. I mean, you take a look at the buildings falling down. They didn't fall down because airplanes hit them. They fell down because of explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7, for God's sake. It didn't fall down to its side. It didn't fall to this direction or that direction; just like the two Towers. …

    When you look at the temperatures that you can create with fuel in a gas tank or a fuel tank of an airplane, and then you investigate the amount of heat that would be required to melt -- to melt -- the superstructure of the buildings that came tumbling down, when you put all of that together, the one thing that shows; It does not match the facts. What is it they do not want the public to know?
    __________________
    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered".......Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father

    People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11


    sunnuntaina 6. huhtikuuta 2008
    People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11

    Please go to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth for further information about the individuals listed below (apart from Torin Wolf and Danny Jowenko).


    Dennis A. Thompson

    Commercial Blaster's License, Calif., General
    Lic: No. 2158 (Rtrd), Eureka, CA

    Bio: Have been working with explosives since Navy 1968, first with torpedoes and then became licensed commercial blaster first in Hawaii and then in California on August 17, 1988.


    Torin Wolf

    Building construction contractor, certified structural welder, certified asbestos and hazardous materials worker, demolitions expert with long experience

    See Torin's 9/11 presentation on National Writers Syndicate.


















    Terral Lee Croft

    General Contractor / Demolition Supervisor

    Bio: General Contractor Experience, 30 years' experience

    Personal 9/11 Statement:

    "My father and his father were General Contractors proficient in demolition and new construction and I am the product of their combined experience. I designed and built my first commercial building at the tender age of twenty-two years old.

    WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns, beams and girders using solid concrete slabs (horizontal) and curtain walls (vertical), which disqualifies 'fire' from being the cause of this collapse. The columns were encased in gypsum wallboard and/or coated with 3-hour 'spray on' protective insulation. Typical building fires burn at around 800 degrees, but the red iron in WTC-7 requires 2800 degrees to begin melting. There is no way 'all' of the steel supports were severed by any fire in just a few hours, unless controlled demolition was carefully planned and executed by demolition specialists. Building fires typically burn in one area for about 20 minutes, before the fuel is extinguished, which is why no steel-framed skyscraper has ever burned down before or after 9/11."


    David C. Avina

    Engineer
    BSME

    Bio: Project Construction Manager 15 years of heavy utility and Industrial construction experience, and 5 years of operations. I also have 10 years of project engineer experience in the construction of large utility power plants and industrial process facilities . In this capacity my responsibility exposed me to all phases of construction practices and procedures from demolition, civil, structural, mechanical electrical controls, and through startup and commissioning.


    Tim Erney

    A & P
    A.S. Aviation Maintenance Technology

    Bio: Licensed A & P mechanic. U.S. Army Reserve, Combat Engineer, Specialized in Demolitions, Honorable Discharge.

    Personal 9/11 Statement:
    "In the Army Reserves I was trained in demolitions so I know what it takes to bring down a building in a controlled symmetrical fashion and what it looks like when it happens. As an aircraft mechanic, my knowledge of the properties of fuels, specifically Jet fuel (or highly refined kerosene), brings the conclusion that fires couldn't be hot enough to cause symmetrical structural collapse. Based on what I know, looking at it from various disciplines, it's obvious that all three WTC buildings collapsed due to pre-planned, well placed, precisely timed controlled demolitions."


    Danny Jowenko

    Owner of a Dutch controlled demolition company, 30 years of demolition experience

    Click here for Jowenko's views of WTC 7.


    Roman Korol

    Engineer
    Lic: 14524

    Bio: Military engineering incl. demolitions; bridge and road design and construction; construction of airports, office buildings, commercial structures. Contract administration. Management of the design and construction of buildings.


    Chris De Gouw

    Military Engineer

    Bio: 32 year old, former Canadian Military Engineer in the Canadian reserves trained is small explosives and demolitions


    Jesse Ventura

    38th Governor of Minnesota 1999 - 2003. Member of U.S. Navy Underwater Demolition Team 12 (precursor to SEAL) 1969 - 1975.

    Read about Ventura's 9/11 views here.


    Frank J. Cullinan

    P.E. Civil Engineer
    Lic: C 50794

    Bio: My expertise is in structure construction of bridges and to a lesser extent demolition of bridges.


    John Suffoletta

    Journeymen Operating Engineer

    Bio: demolition of steel and concrete buildings, also some wood structures

    Personal 9/11 Statement:
    I believe I have the experience to know the difference between an implosion or a building consumed by fire to the point of collapse. I actually run the equipment that rips and tears these buildings down, and I know what it takes! A building consumed with fire would droop , contort and lean to the weakest point before falling! It would not fall straight to the ground in nice net truck length pieces, with the concrete almost completely pulverized.
    Lähettänyt Truthseeker klo 13.39
    Tilaa: Blogitekstit (Atom) Blogiarkisto
    ▼ 2008 (1)
    ▼ huhtikuu (1)
    People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2010
  4. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    20,791
    Thanks Received:
    2,173
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,406

    No missile wreckage was found.
    A missile cannot knock down five light poles.
    Human DNA of passengers was found at the Pentagon.



    Consider yourself debunked.
     
  5. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    26,250
    Thanks Received:
    1,746
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +1,746
    cornycunt
     
  6. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +91
    Hi Corn:

    This is the problem right here with these Official Govt Cover Story Stooges!

    Hey, Ms. Corn. I do not expect you or any of your Official Cover Story Idiots to offer rebuttals to A SINGLE WORD of my 911Truth Testimony. However, this challenge was made to show these USMB registered members and readers that NONE of you (Gamolon, Mr. Fizz, Ollie, Ms. Corn, Diver, Trojan, Retired Guy, etc.) can start your own Topic using your own 'evidence' to prop up the Official 9/11 Cover Story LIES. That means starting your Topic saying:

    1. "Flight 93 Crashed In The Field Outside Shanksville."
    2. "Flight 77 Crashed Into The Pentagon Going 530 Miles Per Hour."
    3. "WTC-7 Collapsed From Building Fires."

    Start your 911Topic in support of Bush's 9/11 LIES and show us YOUR EVIDENCE. Do it! You Govt Cover Story Stooges come out to this fine USMB Conspiracy Theories Forum every day to wave your arms around and support Inside Job MURDERERS Of Innocent Americans without one Topic detailing 'your thesis, claims and evidence to support those Official Cover Story Conclusions! ZERO.

    Now you can 'put up' or SHUT UP, because everyone knows 'you' are a liar, just like Bush:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60"]Bush (like you) Has Been Lying Since Day One[/ame]

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zvQGqKGNSQ]Official Govt 911 Lies Are Too Many To Count[/ame]

    GL,

    Terral
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2010
  7. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    20,791
    Thanks Received:
    2,173
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,406
    No missile wreckage was found at the Pentagon.
    Bodies and remains of passengers on Flight 77 WERE found at the Pentagon.
    A missile cannot take down five light poles.

    Consider yourself debunked.
     
  8. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +344
    why woyld anyone start a thread on the official version of events in the CONSPIRACY FORUM?!! :cuckoo: its not a conspiracy. its what actually happened.

    no. its not a 100 ton jetliner. its a 64 ton jetliner. Boeing 757-200 | Airliners.net
    (you keep lying and you are going to go to hell) :evil:

    do you need glasses? look at all the debris scattered all over the place!! :lol:

    you mean the empty hole with all the airplane parts in it? THAT EMPTY HOLE?!! :lol:
    the USGS photo from 1994 isnt the same hole. you can still see the scar on the ground where the 1994 hole was in the 9/11 pictures.

    ooops. you lied again. HELL FOR YOU!! :evil:


    757 parts from flight 93 recovered in and around your "empty hole"
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    the transcripts from flight 93 cockpit voice recorder recovered from your "empty hole"
    Key:
    Bolded text = English translation from Arabic
    TIME EDT Transcript

    09:31:57 Ladies and gentlemen: Here the captain, please sit down keep remaining seating. We have a bomb on board. So sit.

    09:32:09 Er, uh ... Calling Cleveland center ... You're unreadable. Say again slowly.

    09:32:10 Don't move. Shut up.

    09:32:13 Come on, come.

    09:32:16 Shut up.

    09:32:17 Don't move.

    09:32:18 Stop.

    09:32:34 Sit, sit, sit down.

    09:32:39 Sit down.

    09:32:41 Unintelligible ... the brother.

    09:32:54 Stop.

    09:33:09 No more. Sit down.

    09:33:10 That's it, that's it, that's it, down, down.

    09:33:14 Shut up.

    09:33:20 Unintelligible

    09:33:20 We just, we didn't get it clear ... Is that United 93 calling?

    09:33:30 Jassim.

    09:33:34 In the name of Allah, the most merciful, the most compassionate.

    09:33:41 Unintelligible.

    09:33:43 Finish, no more. No more.

    09:33:49 No. No, no, no, no.

    09:33:53 No, no, no, no.



    09:34:00 Go ahead, lie down. Lie down. Down, down, down.

    09:34:06 There is someone ... Huh?

    09:34:12 Down, down, down. Sit down. Come on, sit down. No, no, no, no, no. No.

    09:34:16 Down, down, down.

    09:34:21 Down.

    09:34:25 No more.

    09:34:26 No more. Down.

    09:34:27 Please, please, please ...

    09:34:28 Down.

    09:34:29 Please, please, don't hurt me ...

    09:34:30 Down. No more.

    09:34:31 Oh God.

    09:34:32 Down, down, down.

    09:34:33 Sit down.

    09:34:34 Shut up.

    09:34:42 No more.

    09:34:46 This?

    09:34:47 Yes.

    09:34:47 Unintelligible.

    09:34:57 One moment, one moment.

    09:34:59 Unintelligible.

    09:35:03 No more.

    09:35:06 Down, down, down, down.

    09:35:09 No, no, no, no, no, no...

    09:35:10 Unintelligible.

    09:35:15 Sit down, sit down, sit down.



    09:35:17 Down.

    09:35:18 What's this?

    09:35:19 Sit down. Sit down. You know, sit down.

    09:35:24 No, no, no.

    09:35:30 Down, down, down, down.

    09:35:32 Are you talking to me?

    09:35:33 No, no, no. Unintelligible.

    09:35:35 Down in the airport.

    09:35:39 Down, down.

    09:35:40 I don't want to die.

    09:35:41 No, no. Down, down.

    09:35:42 I don't want to die. I don't want to die.

    09:35:44 No, no. Down, down, down, down, down, down.

    09:35:47 No, no, please.

    09:35:57 No.

    09:37:06 That's it. Go back.

    09:37:06 That's it. Sit down.

    09:37:36 Everthing is fine. I finished.

    09:38:36 Yes.

    09:39:11 Ah. Here's the captain. I would like to tell you all to remain seated. We have a bomb aboard, and we are going back to the airport, and we have our demands. So, please remain quiet.

    09:39:21 Okay. That's 93 calling?

    09:39:24 One moment.

    09:39:34 United 93. I understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead.

    09:39:42 And center exec jet nine fifty-six. That was the transmission.

    09:39:47 Okay. Ah. Who called Cleveland?



    09:39:52 Executive jet nine fifty-six, did you understand that transmission?

    09:39:56 Affirmative. He said that there was a bomb on board.

    09:39:58 That was all you got out of it also?

    09:40:01 Affirmative.

    09:40:03 Roger.

    09:40:03 United 93. Go ahead.

    09:40:14 United 93. Go ahead.

    09:40:17 Ahhh.

    09:40:52 This green knob?

    09:40:54 Yes, that's the one.

    09:41:05 United 93, do you hear the Cleveland center?

    09:41:14 One moment. One moment.

    09:41:15 Unintelligible.

    09:41:56 Oh man.

    09:44:18 This does not work now.

    09:45:13 Turn it off.

    09:45:16 ... Seven thousand ...

    09:45:19 How about we let them in? We let the guys in now.

    09:45:23 Okay.

    09:45:24 Should we let the guys in?

    09:45:25 Inform them, and tell him to talk to the pilot. Bring the pilot back.

    09:45:57 In the name of Allah. In the name of Allah. I bear witness that there is no other God, but Allah.

    09:47:31 Unintelligible.

    09:47:40 Allah knows.

    09:48:15 Unintelligible.

    09:48:38 Set course.



    09:49:37 Unintelligible.

    09:51:17 Unintelligible.

    09:51:35 Unintelligible.

    09:52:02 Unintelligible.

    09:52:31 Unintelligible.

    09:53:20 The best thing: The guys will go in, lift up the ... Unintelligible ... and they put the axe into it. So, everyone will be scared.

    09:53:27 Yes.

    09:53:28 The axe.

    09:53:28 Unintelligible.

    09:53:29 No, not the.

    09:53:35 Let him look through the window. Let him look through the window.

    09:53:52 Unintelligible.

    09:54:09 Open.

    09:54:11 Unintelligible.

    09:55:06 You are ... One ...

    09:56:15 Unintelligible.

    09:57:55 Is there something?

    09:57:57 A fight?

    09:54:59 Yeah?

    09:58:33 Unintelligible. Let's go guys. Allah is greatest. Allah is greatest. Oh guys. Allah is greatest.

    09:58:41 Ugh.

    09:58:43 Ugh.

    09:58:44 Oh Allah. Oh Allah. Oh the most gracious.

    09:58:47 Ugh. Ugh.

    09:58:52 Stay back.



    09:58:55 In the cockpit.

    09:58:57 In the cockpit.

    09:58:57 They want to get in here. Hold, hold from the inside. Hold from the inside. Hold.

    09:59:04 Hold the door.

    09:59:09 Stop him.

    09:59:11 Sit down.

    09:59:13 Sit down.

    09:59:15 Sit down.

    09:58:16 Unintelligible.

    09:59:17 What?

    09:59:18 There are some guys. All those guys.

    09:59:20 Lets get them.

    09:59:25 Sit down.

    09:59:29 What?

    09:59:30 What.

    09:59:31 What?

    09:59:36 Unintelligible.

    09:59:37 What?

    09:59:39 Unintelligible.

    09:59:41 Unintelligible.

    09:59:42 Trust in Allah, and in him.

    09:59:45 Sit down.

    09:59:47 Unintelligible.

    09:59:53 Ahh.

    09:59:55 Unintelligible.

    09:59:58 Ahh.



    10:00:06 There is nothing.

    10:00:07 Is that it? Shall we finish it off?

    10:00:08 No. Not yet.

    10:00:09 When they all come, we finish it off.

    10:00:11 There is nothing.

    10:00:13 Unintelligible.

    10:00:14 Ahh.

    10:00:15 I'm injured.

    10:00:16 Unintelligible.

    10:00:21 Ahh.

    10:00:22 Oh Allah. Oh Allah. Oh Gracious.

    10:00:25 In the cockpit. If we don't, we'll die.

    10:00:29 Up, down. Up, down, in the cockpit.

    10:00:33 The cockpit.

    10:00:37 Up, down. Saeed, up, down.

    10:00:42 Roll it.

    10:00:55 Unintelligible.

    10:00:59 Allah is the Greatest. Allah is the Greatest.

    10:01:01 Unintelligible.

    10:01:08 Is that it? I mean, shall we pull it down?

    10:01:09 Yes, put it in it, and pull it down.

    10:01:10 Unintelligible.

    10:01:11 Saeed.

    10:01:12 ... engine ...

    10:01:13 Unintelligible.

    10:01:16 Cut off the oxygen.



    10:01:18 Cut off the oxygen. Cut off the oxygen. Cut off the oxygen.

    10:01:34 Unintelligible.

    10:01:37 Unintelligible.

    10:01:41 Up, down. Up, down.

    10:01:41 What?

    10:01:42 Up, down.

    10:01:42 Ahh.

    10:01:53 Ahh.

    10:01:54 Unintelligible.

    10:01:55 Ahh.

    10:01:59 Shut them off.

    10:02:03 Shut them off.

    10:02:14 Go.

    10:02:14 Go.

    10:02:15 Move.

    10:02:16 Move.

    10:02:17 Turn it up.

    10:02:18 Down, down.

    10:02:23 Pull it down. Pull it down.

    10:02:25 Down. Push, push, push, push, push.

    10:02:33 Hey. Hey. Give it to me. Give it to me.

    10:02:35 Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me.

    10:02:37 Give it to me. Give it to me. Give it to me.

    10:02:40 Unintelligible.

    10:03:02 Allah is the greatest.

    10:03:03 Allah is the greatest.



    10:03:04 Allah is the greatest.

    10:03:06 Allah is the greatest.

    10:03;06 Allah is the greatest.

    10:03:07 No.

    10:03:09 Allah is the greatest. Allah is the greatest.

    10:03:09 Allah is the greatest. Allah is the greatest.

    thats 4 minutes and 9 seconds of my life wasted that i will never get back. its all the same lies you say on here all the time. its already debunked. the 1994 hole isnt the same hole. the empty hole has airplane parts. not one of the other plane crashes he shows was of a plane that was intentionally crashed at over 500mph. most likely they were trying to land the plane safely. (but we will never know because the idiot doesnt tell us what crashes they are). then he shows bombs!!! :cuckoo:

    if you can prove the government is lying i will happily admit it. the problem is that you didnt prove it.

    your wild, incoherent and completely impossible hoaxes have absolutely no physical evidence. NONE. your theories get debunked over and over and over again. then you start a new thread and pretend that never happened.
    you've been exposed as the fucking moron you truly are. :cuckoo:
     
  9. ☭proletarian☭
    Online

    ☭proletarian☭ Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,179
    Thanks Received:
    2,952
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,952
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSRF3slguhI&feature=related]YouTube - Will Smith - Men In Black[Official Music Video][/ame]
     

Share This Page