Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently

None. Next ...
None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.


Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.
I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.

Oh, of course you did


Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.
Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'. So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense. If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty. According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.


lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.
How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.

You posted what?

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication. However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source. On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list. Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions[/QUOTE]

So you also think the Israelis are in control of the flagpole at the UN building too, like lil Billy?





So which ones are breaches of International law then, and which are just anti semitic Jew hatred

None of them.

There is a reason why these clowns all run back to the lil clown car and jump back in when asked questions that require a straight answer, then drive around in a circle and all jump out again, pretend nothing happened, and repeat themselves.[/QUOTE]

Most of them address breaches of International Law.
 
None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

Forget your own posts already? I gave you a direct and accurate answer to your question. You refuse to, as usual.


Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.
I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.

Oh, of course you did


Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.
Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.

You tards keep posting gibberish about alledged 'violations'. So come up with some already, real ones, instead of just blathering nonsense. If there are all these 'violations' then just show us the ICJ cases where they've been found guilty. According to you, there are supposed to be zillions.


lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.
How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.

You posted what?

Tell the truth now, lil Billy: Do you believe the Israelis are in charge of the UN flagpole?

Some of the earlier UN resolutions regarding Israel are listed in an admittedly pro-Palestine publication. However, such a list will would probably not be compiled in a pro-Israel source. On Wiki, with all the edits, I doubt it would be a reliable list. Each of these resolutions are available in the UN archives and can be checked out individually if anyone has any doubts as to the authenticity of the list.

Res. 57 (Sep. 18, 1948) – Expresses deep shock at the assassination of the U.N. Mediator in Palestine, Count Folke Bernadotte, by Zionist terrorists.

Res. 89 (Nov. 17, 1950) – Requests that attention be given to the expulsion of “thousands of Palestine Arabs” and calls upon concerned governments to take no further action “involving the transfer of persons across international frontiers or armistice lines”, and notes that Israel announced that it would withdraw to the armistice lines.

Res. 93 (May 18, 1951) – Finds that Israeli airstrikes on Syria on April 5, 1951 constitutes “a violation of the cease-fire”, and decides that Arab civilians expelled from the demilitarized zone by Israel should be allowed to return.

Res. 100 (Oct. 27, 1953) – Notes that Israel had said it would stop work it started in the demilitarized zone on September 2, 1953.

Res. 101 (Nov. 24, 1953) – Finds Israel’s attack on Qibya, Jordan on October 14-15, 1953 to be a violation of the cease-fire and “Expresses the strongest censure of that action”.

Res. 106 (Mar. 29, 1955) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Egyptian forces in the Gaza Strip on February 28, 1955.

Res. 111 (Jan. 19, 1956) – Condemns Israel’s attack on Syria on December 11, 1955 as “a flagrant violation of the cease-fire” and armistice agreement.

Res. 119 (Oct. 31, 1956) – Considers that “a grave situation has been created” by the attack against Egypt by the forces of Britain, France, and Israel.

Res. 171 (Apr. 9, 1962) – Reaffirms resolution 111 and determines that Israel’s attack on Syria on March 16-17, 1962 “constitutes a flagrant violation of that resolution”.

Res. 228 (Nov. 25, 1966) – “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property resulting from the action” by Israel in the southern Hebron area on November 13, 1966, and “Censures Israel for this large-scale military action in violation of the United Nations Charter” and the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan.

Res. 237 (Jun. 14, 1967) – Calls on Israel “to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants where military operations have taken place” during the war launched by Israel on June 5, 1967 “and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities”.

Res. 242 (Nov. 22, 1967) – Emphasizes “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”, emphasizes that member states have a commitment to abide by the U.N. Charter, and calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied” during the June 1967 war.

Res. 248 (Mar. 24, 1968) – Observes that the Israeli attack on Jordan “was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, “Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”, and “Calls upon Israel to desist from” further violations of resolution 237.

Res. 250 (Apr. 27, 1968) – Considers “that the holding of a military parade in Jerusalem will aggravate tensions in the area and have an adverse effect on a peaceful settlement of the problems in the area” and “Calls upon Israel to refrain from holding the military parade in Jerusalem which is contemplated” for May 2, 1968.

Res. 251 (May 2, 1968) – Recalls resolution 250 and “Deeply deplores the holding by Israel of the military parade in Jerusalem” on May 2, 1968 “in disregard of” resolution 250.

Res. 252 (May 21, 1968) – “Deplores the failure of Israel to comply with” General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, considers Israel’s annexation of Jerusalem “invalid”, and calls upon Israel “to rescind all such measures already taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to change the status of Jerusalem”.

Res. 256 (Aug. 16, 1968) – Recalls Israel’s “flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter” condemned in resolution 248, observes that further Israeli air attacks on Jordan “were of a large scale and carefully planned nature in violation of resolution 248”, “Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property”, and condemns Israel’s attacks.

Res. 259 (Sep. 27, 1968) – Expresses concern for “the safety, welfare and security” of the Palestinians “under military occupation by Israel”, deplores “the delay in the implementation of resolution 237 (1967) because of the conditions still being set by Israel for receiving a Special Representative of the Secretary-General”, and requests Israel to receive the Special Representative and facilitate his work.

Res. 262 (Dec. 31, 1968) – Observes “that the military action by the armed forces of Israel against the civil International Airport of Beirut was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned nature”, and condemns Israel for the attack.

Res.265 (Apr. 1, 1969) – Expresses “deep concern that the recent attacks on Jordanian villages and other populated areas were of a pre-planned nature, in violation of resolutions” 248 and 256, “Deplores the loss of civilian life and damage to property”, and “Condemns the recent premeditated air attacks launched by Israel on Jordanian villages and populated areas in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions”.

Res. 267 (Jul. 3, 1969) – Recalls resolution 252 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 and 2254, notes that “since the adoption of the above-mentioned resolutions Israel has taken further measures tending to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Deplores the failure of Israel to show any regard for the resolutions”, “Censures in the strongest terms all measures taken to change the status of the City of Jerusalem”, “Confirms that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel which purport to alter the status of Jerusalem, including expropriation of land and properties thereon, are invalid and cannot change that status”, and urgently calls on Israel to rescind the measures taken to annex Jerusalem.

Res. 270 (Aug. 26, 1969) – “Condemns the premeditated air attack by Israel on villages in southern Lebanon in violation of its obligations under the Charter and Security Council resolutions”.

Res. 271 (Sep. 15, 1969) – Expresses grief “at the extensive damage caused by arson to the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem” on August 21, 1969 “under the military occupation of Israel”, reaffirms “the established principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible”, “Determines that the execrable act of desecration and profanation of the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque emphasizes the immediate necessity of Israel’s desisting from acting in violation” previous resolutions and rescinding measures to annex Jerusalem, calls on Israel “to observe the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and international law governing military occupation”, and condemns Israel’s failure to comply with previous resolutions.

Res. 279 (May 12, 1970) – “Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Res. 280 (May 19, 1970) – Expresses conviction that “that the Israeli military attack against Lebanon was premeditated and of a large scale and carefully planned in nature”, recalls resolution 279 “demanding the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory”, deplores Israel’s violation of resolutions 262 and 270, “Condemns Israel for its premeditated military action in violation of its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations”, and “Deplores the loss of life and damage to property inflicted as a result” of Israeli violations of Security Council resolutions.

Res. 285 (Sep. 5, 1970) – “Demands the complete and immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory.”

Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions

So you also think the Israelis are in control of the flagpole at the UN building too, like lil Billy?





So which ones are breaches of International law then, and which are just anti semitic Jew hatred

None of them.

There is a reason why these clowns all run back to the lil clown car and jump back in when asked questions that require a straight answer, then drive around in a circle and all jump out again, pretend nothing happened, and repeat themselves.[/QUOTE]

Most of them address breaches of International Law.[/QUOTE]




Then why hasn't the ICC/ICJ issued arrest warrants for Israel's leaders on such charges, or is it because no actual international laws were breached and it was just islamonazi propaganda and Racist attacks that you believe asre factys.
 
Awwwwwww.... is itty-bitty Israel treated differently? Tsk... tsk... tsk... my... my... my... oh, dearie me...how unfair...

laughing-o.gif

Are you OK, Kondor? Thought you were on our side...
 
Israel is the only country that doesn't get away with anything.

Look at Assad, look at Putin, look at China or Saudia Arabia. They can murder political adversaries, take over countries, kill and maim civilians etc without anyone batting an eye-lid.

lol indeed. Those are also countries that routinely vote for these fatuous and ridiculous 'Resolutions' that the clown car passengers claim are 'international law n stuff'.
 
None. Next ...
None what? Care to explain WTF you're talking about?

go back and read your own post, dumbass. I answered your question, and with the correct answer. Whether or onot you're unhappy with it and choose to wet yourself and slobber, hold your breath and turn blue, whatever is of no concern to anybody but your therapist, and that's only if your parents have paid his last bill.


Yes, you're embarrassed by the answer, so avoid it. Typical of those who have no real principles and have no qualms about distorting the facts.
I didn't avoid that answer. I made the point your statement was moot.

yes, you did, and you made no point, just avoided responding; in other words, you knew you would look like an idiot. Far too late to be worrying about that, lil Billy.


Yet nobody has brought any of these alleged 'violations' to the ICJ; that's because they're nonsense, and even a kangaroo Court won't touch them. It's just a load of drivel put out by sociopaths that cretins like yourself get woodies over repeating over and over.
Ah, the little kiss-ass troll, is trying to change the subject.

Lol still won't answer, and hoping nobody notices? Back away from the bong, take a nap, and take your meds.


lol you didn't read even a single one of those, or you wouldn't be citing them as examples. Typical retarded bigot just cut and pasting from some propaganda site, too stupid to fact check even simple posts, so obviously 'shit bitch' is just projection on your part.
How the fuck would you know what I've read? You claimed the Pals were breaking international law, but couldn't cite one law to back up your claim. Whereas I posted a whole slew of resolutions Israel was in violation of and you don't even have the balls to comment on them.

Still think the Israelis control the flag pole at the UN building? If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you're admitting you didn't read squat, just cut and pasted some gibberish you've never actually read. And still not a single refutation of any of the points in the OP, either, speaking of no balls. Should we start referring to you as 'Billi'?
 
Last edited:
Ran across this on another site and thought it would fit here. Apologies if someone already posted it.

Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently

You don't have to be a pro-Israel activist to be troubled by the grotesquely unjust treatment of Israel.

...


It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countries in the international system. Of course, Israel deserves scrutiny, as does every other nation. But it also merits equal treatment – nothing more, nothing less.

First, Israel is the only UN member state whose very right to exist is under constant challenge.


Notwithstanding the fact that Israel embodies an age-old connection with the Jewish people as repeatedly cited in the most widely read book in the world, the Bible, that it was created based on the 1947 recommendation of the UN, and that it has been a member of the world body since 1949, there's a relentless chorus of nations, institutions, and individuals denying Israel's very political legitimacy.


No one would dare question the right to exist of many other countries whose basis for legitimacy is infinitely more questionable than Israel's, including those that were created by brute force, occupation, or distant mapmakers. Just look around at how many nations fit those categories, including, by the way, quite a few Arab countries. Why, then, is it open hunting season only on Israel? Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's the only Jewish-majority country in the world?

...

Sums up most of the salient points throughout the rest of the article.

When a true genius makes his way into the world you will know him by this sign: the whole world will be in confederacy against him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top