Temperature fraud at NOAA

[Little-Acorn]

The US Historical Climatology Record (USHCN) is a set of data that's been recorded and kept for many decades.

For details, see Background Long-Term Daily and Monthly Climate Records from Stations Across the Contiguous United States

Now it seems that the data they have been collecting, is not what has been reported.

SSDD.

Which is accurate, and which is faked?

Whichever it is, one has to wonder why they are different at all.

------------------------------------------------

Mind-Blowing Temperature Fraud At NOAA Real Science

Mind-Blowing Temperature Fraud At NOAA

Posted on July 27, 2015
by Steven Goddard

The measured US temperature data from USHCN shows that the US is on a long-term cooling trend. But the reported temperatures from NOAA show a strong warming trend.

Measured : ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz
Reported : ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz

They accomplish this through a spectacular hockey stick of data tampering, which corrupts the US temperature trend by almost two degrees.

The biggest component of this fraud is making up data. Almost half of all reported US temperature data is now fake. They fill in missing rural data with urban data to create the appearance of non-existent US warming.

The depths of this fraud is breathtaking, but completely consistent with the fraudulent profession which has become known as “climate science”.

 

[Obiwan]

Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions - NaturalNews.com


Now, in what might be the largest scientific fraud ever uncovered, NASA and the NOAA have been caught red-handed altering historical temperature data to produce a "climate change narrative" that defies reality. This finding, originally documented on theReal Science website, is detailed here.

We now know that historical temperature data for the continental United States were deliberately altered by NASA and NOAA scientists in a politically-motivated attempt to rewrite history and claim global warming is causing U.S. temperatures to trend upward. The data actually show that we are in a cooling trend, not a warming trend (see charts below).

This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting (1), "NOAA's US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with data 'fabricated' by computer models."

Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then published as fact.

Here's the proof of the climate change fraud
Here's the chart of U.S. temperatures published by NASA in 1999. It shows the highest temperatures actually occurred in the 1930's, followed by a cooling trend ramping downward to the year 2000:

The authenticity of this chart is not in question. It is published by James Hansen on NASA's website. (2) On that page, Hansen even wrote, "Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought."

After the Obama administration took office, however, and started pushing the global warming narrative for political purposes, NASA was directed to alter its historical data in order to reverse the cooling trend and show a warming trend instead. This was accomplished using climate-modeling computers that simply fabricated the data the researchers wished to see instead of what was actually happening in the real world.

Using the exact same data found in the chart shown above (with a few years of additional data after 2000), NASA managed to misleadingly distort the chart to depict the appearance of global warming:

The authenticity of this chart is also not in question. It can be found right now on NASA's servers. (4)

This new, altered chart shows that historical data -- especially the severe heat and droughts experienced in the 1930's -- are now systematically suppressed to make them appear cooler than they really were. At the same time, temperature data from the 1970's to 2010 are strongly exaggerated to make them appear warmer than they really were.

This is a clear case of scientific fraud being carried out on a grand scale in order to deceive the entire world about global warming.

EPA data also confirm the global warming hoax
What's even more interesting is that even the EPA's "Heat Wave Index" data further support the notion that the U.S. was far hotter in the 1930's than it is today.

The following chart, published on theEPA.gov website (4), clearly shows modern-day heat waves are far smaller and less severe than those of the 1930's. In fact, the seemingly "extreme" heat waves of the last few years were no worse than those of the early 1900's or 1950's.

Learn more: Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions - NaturalNews.com

 

[Little-Acorn]

Yet the Democrats still pretend we can do anything to change earth's climate.

 

[defcon4]

"Temperature fraud at NOAA"
Who said that???!!!!! Not on My watch!!!!

 

[Little-Acorn]

Who/what is that?

 

[Obiwan]

Global warming debunked NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere - NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence.

As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth's upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.

"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."

Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2
According to the data, up to 95 percent of solar radiation is literally bounced back into space by both CO2 and NO in the upper atmosphere. Without these necessary elements, in other words, the earth would be capable of absorbing potentially devastating amounts of solar energy that would truly melt the polar ice caps and destroy the planet.

"The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet," write H. Schreuder and J. O'Sullivan for PSI. "[T]his compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS."

Dr. Hansen, of course, is an outspoken global warming activist who helped spark man-made climate change hysteria in the U.S. back in 1988. Just after the release of the new SABER study, however, Dr. Hansen conveniently retired from his career as a climatologist at NASA, and reportedly now plans to spend his time "on science," and on "drawing attention to [its] implications for young people."

You can read more details of the new NASA SABER study by visiting:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

You can also check out a informative, four-minute video report on the solar storm here:


Sources for this article include:

http://principia-scientific.org

Solar Storm Dumps Gigawatts into Earth s Upper Atmosphere - NASA Science


Learn more: Global warming debunked NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere - NaturalNews.com

 

[mamooth]

You understand PSI is a pack of gibbering kooks, right? Even other deniers are ashamed to quote them. Along with Hockey Schtick, they're the lowest of the low.

95% of solar radiation reflected? Dang. Earth should be frozen solid. So why isn't it?

Gigawatts from a solar storm! Wow! That's ... completely insignificant, given the earth is constantly bathed in about 200 million gigawatts of solar energy.

You've been snookered, Obi. Everyone else sees it. Pity you can't.

And defcon's image? I assumed that was a selfie.

 

[defcon4]

You understand PSI is a pack of gibbering kooks, right? Even other deniers are ashamed to quote them. Along with Hockey Schtick, they're the lowest of the low.

95% of solar radiation reflected? Dang. Earth should be frozen solid. So why isn't it?

Gigawatts from a solar storm! Wow! That's ... completely insignificant, given the earth is constantly bathed in about 200 million gigawatts of solar energy.

You've been snookered, Obi. Everyone else sees it. Pity you can't.

And defcon's image? I assumed that was a selfie.

They are just around the corner… global cooling is coming to your way.

 

[Crick]

From where? What evidence makes you think so?

 

[defcon4]

From where? What evidence makes you think so?

Global Cooling is Here Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

 

[mamooth]

Your source Easterbrook has been predicting immediate cooling for the past decade now.

Is it here yet? I just ask because the temperatures keeps rising.

 

[jc456]

Your source Easterbrook has been predicting immediate cooling for the past decade now.

Is it here yet? I just ask because the temperatures keeps rising.

yes, it is. tough to see it through everyone elses fraud.