Teaching biblical truth could get your kids taken away

[martybegan]

Not only does he deny God; but he also denies basic and obvious scientific facts, such as the distinction between boys and girls. How much more screwed-up than that can an individual get?

Except people with science and degrees say gender is more than DNA or genitals... but never mind.

I know it's tough for your bigots, you can't pick on minorities, women or gays anymore, so all you are left with is picking on the "Trannies".

people with science and degrees used to say you can determine intelligence by head measurements.

The only bigot I am seeing right now is you.

 

[martybegan]

Someone who denies the difference between men and women is in no credible position to accuse anyone else of “sexual insecurities” or other sexual issues.

But to answer your question, as long as they keep their sick perversions to themselves, it doesn't affect me. As a husband, as a brother, as a son, as a nephew, and as a male acquaintance of many other women in many different capacities—as a man—I have a duty and an obligation to protect those women with whom I am acquainted from the sick, disgusting perverts whose side you choose to take against that of these and all other women. If you were any kind of decent man, you would feel the exact same obligation. If one of these filthy perverts chooses to follow my wife, my mother, my sister, my aunt, or any of my other female acquaintances into the ladies' room, then it becomes very much my business.

Dude, that's kind of patronizing. first, this is the 21st century. Women are capable of taking care of themselves. I know this thought frightens you even more than a dude in a dress.

Second, most of these women have probably peed next to a trans woman dozens of times and never knew the difference.

The way progressives act, Women need big daddy government to pay for their things and take care of them. Progressive patronize all women.

 

[JoeB131]

There are those of us who have been brought up to be real men, and those who have not. I guess it's clear enough which sort you are.

I'm the one who has a box full of medals from the US Army, so not so much. What did you do?

 

[JoeB131]

The way progressives act, Women need big daddy government to pay for their things and take care of them. Progressive patronize all women.

Not really. Most people on welfare are only on it for a few years in a rough patch in their lives.

Meanwhile, you have middle class white people who are on medicare and social security for decades.

But you keep working those racist stereotypes, marty.

 

[JoeB131]

people with science and degrees used to say you can determine intelligence by head measurements.

Until other people with science tested the theory and proved it wrong. Not that it wasn't a bad theory in 1800, given much of the world still believed witches were a thing.

The difference between faith and science is that faith fits reality around the theory, and science fits theory around reality.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So teaching your kids to hate other people ad believe in things that simply have no evidence is somehow good in your mind? Man, you're really screwed up.

there is a big difference between tolerance and acceptance

I can tolerate anything while not necessarily accepting it and without liking or hating it.

It's my opinion on most things that it's none of my fucking business and I will neither support nor defend things that are none of my business

 

[martybegan]

The way progressives act, Women need big daddy government to pay for their things and take care of them. Progressive patronize all women.

Not really. Most people on welfare are only on it for a few years in a rough patch in their lives.

Meanwhile, you have middle class white people who are on medicare and social security for decades.

But you keep working those racist stereotypes, marty.

It's not just welfare. Remember the whole "Life of Julia" crap that was foisted years ago?

Obama's 'Life of Julia' Was Made to Be Mocked

Both of those programs have serious issues. Medicare is not even close to funded enough, and Social Security's "trust fund" is an illusion.

But at least with SS people pay into it their whole lives before taking it back.

Not so much with Welfare and all those other programs.

 

[martybegan]

people with science and degrees used to say you can determine intelligence by head measurements.

Until other people with science tested the theory and proved it wrong. Not that it wasn't a bad theory in 1800, given much of the world still believed witches were a thing.

The difference between faith and science is that faith fits reality around the theory, and science fits theory around reality.

yet you assume that currently we have all the answers, and some scientist in 2100 will not look back and say "what a bunch of idiots they were"

You have fallen for the assumption that our current scientific understanding is the end all be all, same thing the head measure guy probably did back then.

 

[hadit]

So teaching your kids to hate other people ad believe in things that simply have no evidence is somehow good in your mind? Man, you're really screwed up.

Do you support the idea that people should lose their children if they don't agree with a particular orthodoxy? That is the question at hand.

 

[JoeB131]

It's not just welfare. Remember the whole "Life of Julia" crap that was foisted years ago?

Obama's 'Life of Julia' Was Made to Be Mocked

Both of those programs have serious issues. Medicare is not even close to funded enough, and Social Security's "trust fund" is an illusion.

But at least with SS people pay into it their whole lives before taking it back.

Not so much with Welfare and all those other programs.

If you live to be 72, you've gotten back everything you paid into SS.

If you have one serious illness, you've gotten back everythign you've paid into Medicare.

If you are on welfare for 1 year (the average) and you are working a job the other 49 we find ourselves in the workforce, you are also paying in more than you get out.

So the question is, who gets ahead in these programs. For instance, I paid for my college by joining the Army. Did the Army benefit more form that or did I. I'd say we both did.

 

[JoeB131]

Do you support the idea that people should lose their children if they don't agree with a particular orthodoxy? That is the question at hand.

That's a good question.

The guy who named his kid Adolf Hitler and the state came in and took his kid because they found that they were teaching them white supremacy.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Do you support the idea that people should lose their children if they don't agree with a particular orthodoxy? That is the question at hand.

That's a good question.

The guy who named his kid Adolf Hitler and the state came in and took his kid because they found that they were teaching them white supremacy.

a huge government overstep

 

[martybegan]

It's not just welfare. Remember the whole "Life of Julia" crap that was foisted years ago?

Obama's 'Life of Julia' Was Made to Be Mocked

Both of those programs have serious issues. Medicare is not even close to funded enough, and Social Security's "trust fund" is an illusion.

But at least with SS people pay into it their whole lives before taking it back.

Not so much with Welfare and all those other programs.

If you live to be 72, you've gotten back everything you paid into SS.

If you have one serious illness, you've gotten back everythign you've paid into Medicare.

If you are on welfare for 1 year (the average) and you are working a job the other 49 we find ourselves in the workforce, you are also paying in more than you get out.

So the question is, who gets ahead in these programs. For instance, I paid for my college by joining the Army. Did the Army benefit more form that or did I. I'd say we both did.

If I even get Social Security, and unless they fix it, it's a big iff.

The problem is the programs can't function anymore on their own, and require general fund money. That is not sustainable.

You are confusing unemployment insurance with welfare. The issue with welfare is that it isn't just one program anymore, and the design of it discourages people from getting off it.

 

[Skull Pilot]

It's not just welfare. Remember the whole "Life of Julia" crap that was foisted years ago?

Obama's 'Life of Julia' Was Made to Be Mocked

Both of those programs have serious issues. Medicare is not even close to funded enough, and Social Security's "trust fund" is an illusion.

But at least with SS people pay into it their whole lives before taking it back.

Not so much with Welfare and all those other programs.

If you live to be 72, you've gotten back everything you paid into SS.

If you have one serious illness, you've gotten back everythign you've paid into Medicare.

If you are on welfare for 1 year (the average) and you are working a job the other 49 we find ourselves in the workforce, you are also paying in more than you get out.

So the question is, who gets ahead in these programs. For instance, I paid for my college by joining the Army. Did the Army benefit more form that or did I. I'd say we both did.

If I even get Social Security, and unless they fix it, it's a big iff.

The problem is the programs can't function anymore on their own, and require general fund money. That is not sustainable.

You are confusing unemployment insurance with welfare. The issue with welfare is that it isn't just one program anymore, and the design of it discourages people from getting off it.

Social Security contributions have been going into the general fund for years.
You have no money in your name in the SS trust fund because there is no SS trust fund

 

[martybegan]

It's not just welfare. Remember the whole "Life of Julia" crap that was foisted years ago?

Obama's 'Life of Julia' Was Made to Be Mocked

Both of those programs have serious issues. Medicare is not even close to funded enough, and Social Security's "trust fund" is an illusion.

But at least with SS people pay into it their whole lives before taking it back.

Not so much with Welfare and all those other programs.

If you live to be 72, you've gotten back everything you paid into SS.

If you have one serious illness, you've gotten back everythign you've paid into Medicare.

If you are on welfare for 1 year (the average) and you are working a job the other 49 we find ourselves in the workforce, you are also paying in more than you get out.

So the question is, who gets ahead in these programs. For instance, I paid for my college by joining the Army. Did the Army benefit more form that or did I. I'd say we both did.

If I even get Social Security, and unless they fix it, it's a big iff.

The problem is the programs can't function anymore on their own, and require general fund money. That is not sustainable.

You are confusing unemployment insurance with welfare. The issue with welfare is that it isn't just one program anymore, and the design of it discourages people from getting off it.

Social Security contributions have been going into the general fund for years.
You have no money in your name in the SS trust fund because there is no SS trust fund

I know that. the problem is they have to start taking makeup money OUT of the general fund. The IOU's are coming home to roost.

 

[hadit]

Do you support the idea that people should lose their children if they don't agree with a particular orthodoxy? That is the question at hand.

That's a good question.

The guy who named his kid Adolf Hitler and the state came in and took his kid because they found that they were teaching them white supremacy.

I'd be interested in a link to that. Did it happen here in America?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

All this tip- toeing around so the RWNJs don't all offended and triggered --

Sheesh, it's exhausting.

[emoji849]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[jknowgood]

So teaching your kids to hate other people ad believe in things that simply have no evidence is somehow good in your mind? Man, you're really screwed up.

You're an idiot, the hate is on the left forcing their perverted ways on normal people. You cannot change your DNA. Get over it.

 

[ding]

So teaching your kids to hate other people ad believe in things that simply have no evidence is somehow good in your mind? Man, you're really screwed up.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe. They confuse critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something they never do.

 

[OnePercenter]

So teaching your kids to hate other people ad believe in things that simply have no evidence is somehow good in your mind? Man, you're really screwed up.

There is nothing in the Bible about hating transgendered........but God made Adam and Eve. The genetic egineering of our genomes has been going on since the late 40's so it's of little wonder to me that chemically induced genetic defects are showing up on the radar.

People like this one do not realize its not a hate as much as an unwillingness to put up with the deviance of some people. Just because someone is screwed up doesn't mean a lot of their behavior is acceptable. Shitting on the sidewalk in most places will get you tossed in jail. My compassion is limited to those attempting to overcome their personal issues not for those who desire to press me into accepting their errors and deviance. We had a tranny sit out here on the porch and he told me his whole story. He was in an area that had high concentrations of Atrazine. There was nothing female about him other than the chemical alterations and the surgeries he had gone through to be a female. Once he lived away from that area where there was Atrazine heavily used he no longer wanted to be a female but it was too late so he got heavily into drugs and was miserable.

You wouldn't believe the how Alex Jones gets picked on when he explains what so many causes of this gayness is from. People are in so much denial it's incredible.

Maybe it's just the way I am, but I would want to know what caused it if I were gay. Not that anything could be changed, but to know why and how come. When it comes down to it , this is why we say this Government has caused so many crimes against humanity is mind blowing.

No matter what gay denies it, tech. none of them come out saying hey I want to be gay . " yes some say they were born that way" let's say that's true for those who are. There again comes what did their mothers eat or drink etc.

It is highly believed plastic " BPA" has caused this epidemic of gays.

Our men are becoming more feminized due to the estrogen mimickers from drugs in the water, the water we drink in general has so many drugs in it. the list is huge.

Right out of the Putin handbook. There isn't any Russian collusion.....RIGHT ;-)