Tea Party v. Democrat Party

[Bfgrn]

Witness the right wing mind...if there ever was a president who was guilty of impeachable offenses, it was G.W. Bush. But when Bush was in office, Flanders and the rest of the right wing turds were licking the ass of the president.

The left still cannot bring itself to admit that THEY agreed to Bush going into Iraq at every point where the vote was taken. In fact once it appeared that they (the Left) were at odds with the American people and voted not to invade they asked for another vote to be taken so that they would not appear to be against the War. Guess what the Vote was 99 -1 to invade after that.

The problem with your position here is that you make stupid statements looking back . Obama does blatant stupid thing in real time that stimulates talk of impeachment.

Silly liberals ,politics is for grownups.

The ONLY opposition to Bush's Hirohito sneak attack on a sovereign nation came from liberals. You right wing scum CHEERED as innocent Iraqi men women and children were being incinerated by our war machine and women and children being tortured and raped at Abu Ghraib.

I supported Bush going after bin Laden and the people who attacked us on 9/11. But he lost my support the minute he started lying about Iraq.

 

[Votto]

Witness the right wing mind...if there ever was a president who was guilty of impeachable offenses, it was G.W. Bush. But when Bush was in office, Flanders and the rest of the right wing turds were licking the ass of the president.

The left still cannot bring itself to admit that THEY agreed to Bush going into Iraq at every point where the vote was taken. In fact once it appeared that they (the Left) were at odds with the American people and voted not to invade they asked for another vote to be taken so that they would not appear to be against the War. Guess what the Vote was 99 -1 to invade after that.

The problem with your position here is that you make stupid statements looking back . Obama does blatant stupid thing in real time that stimulates talk of impeachment.

Silly liberals ,politics is for grownups.

The ONLY opposition to Bush's Hirohito sneak attack on a sovereign nation came from liberals. You right wing scum CHEERED as innocent Iraqi men women and children were being incinerated by our war machine and women and children being tortured and raped at Abu Ghraib.

I supported Bush going after bin Laden and the people who attacked us on 9/11. But he lost my support the minute he started lying about Iraq.

Liberals supported Obama after he criticized Bush for going to war in Iraq, and then Liberals supported Obama when going to war in other places around the globe.

 

[Flanders]

Rather than impeach Taqiyya the Liar when Republicans take the Senate in November —— time the Senate trial for January 2017. He’s not going to jail anyway, but by impeaching him at the very last minute he loses his pension, his Secret Service bodyguards, and so on while Democrats benefit nothing. Hell, the Senate trial can be finely tuned so that dirt bag Biden does not get sworn in.

David Limbaugh does not go as far as do I but he comes close. His reasoning for impeaching Taqiyya the Liar is impeccable, but I cannot see when he would do it if not at the last minute as I suggest:

I don't think Congress should begin impeachment proceedings against President Obama right now, but I also don't think that considering the idea is "crazy talk."

XXXXX​

Though it may not be the opportune time for impeachment, I am very concerned about what Obama's unchecked usurpations of power have done to the balance of power in the federal government and the overall integrity of the Constitution and the rule of law.

Has the Right lost its will to fight?
By David Limbaugh | July 17, 2014 | 4:42 pm

Has the Right lost its will to fight? | WashingtonExaminer.com​

 

[Agit8r]

Tea Partiers fighting for sovereignty was an obscure aspect of the ideological conflict before the Democrat party-engineered invasion. The huge invasion of illegal aliens clearly shows that Tea Partiers are fighting for America’s sovereignty. Indeed, Democrats can take a bow for bringing home the importance of America’s sovereignty.
[/B]

So... America didn't have sovereignty before 1875?

 

[g4racer]

When they have their own candidates and $upport them to the extent they are doing you can call it a party. I don't know if you have been keeping up with elections; but the battles between the GOP and Tea Party are on the same level as GOP and Dems.
The reason the Tea Party refuses to admit they are a separate party is that they still need the GOP more than the GOP needs them.

 

[Crystalclear]

Sarah Putin is a pinhead!
The Tea Bag Brotherhood are domestic terrorists.

Promoting less government, more state rights, less regulation and better-secured borders is certainly not terrorism

 

[edthecynic]

Sarah Putin is a pinhead!
The Tea Bag Brotherhood are domestic terrorists.

Promoting less government, more state rights, less regulation and better-secured borders is certainly not terrorism

And it certainly is not the Tea Bag Brotherhood either!

 

[Flanders]

So... America didn't have sovereignty before 1875?

To Agit8r: I do not get your point!

In any event no group in 1875 had the wealth and political influence to surrender America’s independence to a global government. The fight for sovereignty that I am talking about began in earnest in 1945. See #10 permalink in this thread:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/military/327079-conscription-liberal-style.html

The seeds were planted early in the 20th century. As bad as Mussolini was he was right about this:

We deny your internationalism, because it is a luxury which only the upper classes can afford; the working people are hopelessly bound to their native shores. Benito Mussolini (1883–1945)

That quote is from his first speech as a member of parliament. He was addressing the Socialists in the Italian Chamber of Deputies. June 21, 1921.

Contemporary Socialists, ever mindful of Mussolini’s criticism, have made his argument meaningless by destroying national boundaries. Serendipitously, Socialists now realize that mass migrations will serve global government much better than was fully understood in 1921.

Fascism was a reaction to Communism in Mussolini’s time. It was not the Treaty of Versailles that caused WWII as so many believe, or as so many who know better teach others to believe. The need to combat Communism by establishing another totalitarian form of government led to Hitler and WWII. It was the wrong choice then as it is now. Socialism/Communism must be defeated, but it must be beaten by limited representative government or freedom will have won nothing.

If you examine what Islamists are saying they, too, are preaching totalitarian government; albeit a theocratic absolutism. Everyone who enjoys individual liberty must stop Socialists from finally authenticating their worldwide totalitarian dream on the pretext of fighting Islamist terrorism. American individual liberties are being threatened by Islamists from without and by Socialists from within. Both must be defeated.

The next decade or so will be the most dangerous period in this country’s history. Much more so than during the Cold War because then the enemy had the same face at home and abroad. Also, throughout the Cold War years the enemies within had to further their agenda with a certain amount of caution lest they expose themselves beyond the mainstream media’s ability to cover for them. Now they are in a position to be openly against Islamic fundamentalists in a way that their loyalty to Soviet Communism never allowed.

You can be sure that even now American Socialists are planning their moves while the country is distracted by terrorists. One very obvious move is to increase the number of unnecessary federal and state employees at every opportunity. The subtle moves will take place with legislation, increased bureaucratic powers, unfunded judicial mandates, etc.

It all comes down this way: Either Socialism/Communism is openly challenged and beaten now, after more than a century of incremental Communism, or representative government will dissolve for centuries —— possibly forever. Individual freedoms and property Rights guaranteed in a form of limited representative government are incompatible with Socialism/Communism; one must survive, one must disappear.

The reason the Tea Party refuses to admit they are a separate party is that they still need the GOP more than the GOP needs them.

To g4racer: See this thread:

Tea Party Theme Song - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Crystalclear]

Sarah Putin is a pinhead!

The Tea Bag Brotherhood are domestic terrorists.

Promoting less government, more state rights, less regulation and better-secured borders is certainly not terrorism

And it certainly is not the Tea Bag Brotherhood either!

No, they are indeed not the Tea Bag Brotherhood either

 

[Flanders]

I believe this:

“He wants us to impeach him now,” Stockman theorized, “before the midterm election because his senior advisors believe that is the only chance the Democratic Party has to avoid a major electoral defeat. Evidently Obama believes impeachment could motivate the Democratic Party base to come out and vote.”

Congressman at border: 'Obama begging to be impeached'
Witnesses shocking procedures for handling illegal immigrants
Published: 4 hours ago
JEROME R. CORSI

Congressman at border: ?Obama begging to be impeached?​

He definitely wants a Senate trial before November where acquittal is a dead certainty. That is why this suggestion makes more sense than ever:

Rather than impeach Taqiyya the Liar when Republicans take the Senate in November —— time the Senate trial for January 2017. He’s not going to jail anyway, but by impeaching him at the very last minute he loses his pension, his Secret Service bodyguards, and so on while Democrats benefit nothing. Hell, the Senate trial can be finely tuned so that dirt bag Biden does not get sworn in.