I know where the Divine Sarah is coming from:
Personally, I have been against removing Taqiyya the Liar going all the back to 2009 when impeachment talk focused on the question of his ineligibility. The things he has done for illegal immigration probably heads the list of reasons to impeach him these days. Illegal immigration changes nothing as far as I’m concerned. Briefly, this is why I would not like to see him removed:
In the past three or four years I’ve said “Let him stay in office, then sit back and watch contempt for him and everything he stands for grow.” That is exactly what happened. The wave of children being used as political pawns can only accelerate the contempt the liar deserves. The ruthlessness built into Taqiyya’s open-borders policy is every bit as merciless as is the cruelty that is built into the Affordable Care Act.
I get Sarah’s legitimate position, and I think I get John Boehner’s, too.
Boehner knows there is not a chance Taqiyya will be removed so long as Democrats control the Senate; anything less than removal will work for the Democrats. The media will use the same tactics defending him that they used defending Bill Clinton; nevertheless, there is a way to do it. Here’s my impeachment suggestion:
Rather than impeach Taqiyya the Liar when Republicans take the Senate in November —— time the Senate trial for January 2017. He’s not going to jail anyway, but by impeaching him at the very last minute he loses his pension, his Secret Service bodyguards, and so on while Democrats benefit nothing. Hell, the Senate trial can be finely tuned so that dirt bag Biden does not get sworn in.
NOTE: Postponing the impeachment will give the Internet more than two years to mute mainstream media defense tactics.
Naturally, a lot depends on more Tea Party conservatives in the Senate and House bringing Karl Rove’s Republicans along.
Obviously Taqiyya’s devoted followers are going to be upset no matter when it is done. They will never vote for a Tea Party conservative or a Republican anyway. Bottom line: Rub their noses in it.
That brings me to the Tea Party versus the Democrat party. Tea Partiers fighting for sovereignty was an obscure aspect of the ideological conflict before the Democrat party-engineered invasion. The huge invasion of illegal aliens clearly shows that Tea Partiers are fighting for America’s sovereignty. Indeed, Democrats can take a bow for bringing home the importance of America’s sovereignty. I can think of no other Democrat betrayal that could have moved the loss of sovereignty up to the most serious threat as effectively as did the invasion. I put it on par with the way most Americans viewed Muslim fundamentalists before 9-11-2001. It took an attack on American soil for Americans to recognize the seriousness of the jihadist threat. The invasion of illegal aliens is no less of an attack.
In addition to sovereignty Tea Partiers fight for the Constitution, and for individual liberties that can only be realized under a severely limited government. Democrats are the exact opposite. That always made me question why over 90 percent of black Americans consistently vote for Democrats. I will not believe that black Americans hate Tea Party values to the point of helping Democrats destroy the country. This is the closest I’ve ever come to a satisfactory explanation:
Black Americans have a love affair with the federal government not the Democrat party. The romance began before the Civil War. They never got over it. The Civil Rights Movement intensified the passion, and continues to this day. Blacks see the federal government as their savior. It’s more than a learned response, it is in their genetic code. To black Americans the Democrat party is the federal government. Black Americans will vote for the Democrats for as long as Democrats are seen as the federal government.
Personally, I have been against removing Taqiyya the Liar going all the back to 2009 when impeachment talk focused on the question of his ineligibility. The things he has done for illegal immigration probably heads the list of reasons to impeach him these days. Illegal immigration changes nothing as far as I’m concerned. Briefly, this is why I would not like to see him removed:
In the past three or four years I’ve said “Let him stay in office, then sit back and watch contempt for him and everything he stands for grow.” That is exactly what happened. The wave of children being used as political pawns can only accelerate the contempt the liar deserves. The ruthlessness built into Taqiyya’s open-borders policy is every bit as merciless as is the cruelty that is built into the Affordable Care Act.
I get Sarah’s legitimate position, and I think I get John Boehner’s, too.
Boehner disagrees with Palin on impeaching Obama
By Ed O'Keefe July 9 at 11:17 AM
Boehner disagrees with Palin on impeaching Obama - The Washington Post
Boehner knows there is not a chance Taqiyya will be removed so long as Democrats control the Senate; anything less than removal will work for the Democrats. The media will use the same tactics defending him that they used defending Bill Clinton; nevertheless, there is a way to do it. Here’s my impeachment suggestion:
Rather than impeach Taqiyya the Liar when Republicans take the Senate in November —— time the Senate trial for January 2017. He’s not going to jail anyway, but by impeaching him at the very last minute he loses his pension, his Secret Service bodyguards, and so on while Democrats benefit nothing. Hell, the Senate trial can be finely tuned so that dirt bag Biden does not get sworn in.
NOTE: Postponing the impeachment will give the Internet more than two years to mute mainstream media defense tactics.
Naturally, a lot depends on more Tea Party conservatives in the Senate and House bringing Karl Rove’s Republicans along.
Obviously Taqiyya’s devoted followers are going to be upset no matter when it is done. They will never vote for a Tea Party conservative or a Republican anyway. Bottom line: Rub their noses in it.
That brings me to the Tea Party versus the Democrat party. Tea Partiers fighting for sovereignty was an obscure aspect of the ideological conflict before the Democrat party-engineered invasion. The huge invasion of illegal aliens clearly shows that Tea Partiers are fighting for America’s sovereignty. Indeed, Democrats can take a bow for bringing home the importance of America’s sovereignty. I can think of no other Democrat betrayal that could have moved the loss of sovereignty up to the most serious threat as effectively as did the invasion. I put it on par with the way most Americans viewed Muslim fundamentalists before 9-11-2001. It took an attack on American soil for Americans to recognize the seriousness of the jihadist threat. The invasion of illegal aliens is no less of an attack.
In addition to sovereignty Tea Partiers fight for the Constitution, and for individual liberties that can only be realized under a severely limited government. Democrats are the exact opposite. That always made me question why over 90 percent of black Americans consistently vote for Democrats. I will not believe that black Americans hate Tea Party values to the point of helping Democrats destroy the country. This is the closest I’ve ever come to a satisfactory explanation:
Black Americans have a love affair with the federal government not the Democrat party. The romance began before the Civil War. They never got over it. The Civil Rights Movement intensified the passion, and continues to this day. Blacks see the federal government as their savior. It’s more than a learned response, it is in their genetic code. To black Americans the Democrat party is the federal government. Black Americans will vote for the Democrats for as long as Democrats are seen as the federal government.
Last edited by a moderator: