Tea Party tries to rewrite history?

Liberals should not have mocked women right out of the home where they were doing the most important job in the world...raising their children and helping them learn.

The feminazi bitches told women, you HAVE to be better than this...(YOU apparently were listening...) and women were shamed into entering the work place whether they wanted to or not.

Then, the poor men that had put in decades at a company are told move aside, we have a quota to fill.


By the way, I was speaking of the sexes in this affirmative action scneario, not the races, although it is impossible for a liberal such as yourself not to throw a race card whenever you can throw it whether appropriate or not.


My original post was a response to Dot Com who (like yourself seems to only post in knee jerk reactions) blamed big business. He makes about as much sense as you.

You’ve provided no documentation for the above.

feminazi bitches

Because you have zero credibility.
 
the right doesnt like facts.

hell they spent days avoiding even telling what standard they use to determine what one is
 
You have no right to deside for women what their life will be like.

They get to chose for themselves

Stupid liberal feminazi bitches had no right to shame women out of the home and tell them what their life should be like.

See how that works?
 
No one forced anyone.

The women desided for themselves what they wanted to seek in the way of a lifestyle
 
No one forced anyone.

The women desided for themselves what they wanted to seek in the way of a lifestyle

Many were shamed into the workforce.


Now back to facts. I provided two links to articles regarding education. Are you going to answer the post, or just spin as usual, saying cons never use facts to debate?
 
You have no right to deside for women what their life will be like.

They get to chose for themselves

You have no right to say that people deciding for them selves what their lives should be is outdated.

Hey, Truthnevermatters, why did you post a story about voting on my visitor messages in response to this post?

Only an idiot like you would try to derail this thread someplace other than ON this thread. :lol:
 
TM: Here is one of the problems conservatives have with the system:

http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/05...-finalist.html

The Cobb County, Ga., school board announced Thursday night that Dallas Superintendent Michael Hinojosa is their lone finalist for their superintendent's vacancy.

Georgia state law requires a 14-day public comment period before the school board can finalize the hiring.

Hinojosa would be leaving a $328,000-a-year job that he has held for six years for one The Dallas Morning News reports has paid a $208,000-a-year base salary.
http://parentadvocates.org/niceconte...articleID=3860
Dr. Mike Moses resigned from the Dallas ISD superintendent's job after July 1, 2004. Undoubtedly he chose that date because of the retirement benefits he will receive. In Texas an educator's retirement benefits are figured on his top three years of service. In this case, Moses' top three years were as the superintendent of the Dallas ISD. (His salary was the highest superintendent's salary in the nation even though there were eleven school districts in the country which were bigger than Dallas ISD.) Moses' retirement benefits will amount to approximately $224,400 per year for the rest of his life.

Are these people in it for the life long cash payout, or for the kids' sake?

How can you support this? When they retire, the positions must be filled, those people will retire, and on and on. How many "educators" do you think taxpayers must fund for over a quarter of a million plus a year for life?
 
Last edited:
Overall Achievement After 1970

Student achievement has stagnated or fallen in most subjects since 1970, with the largest and most thoroughly established decline occurring in basic literacy. That is the verdict of the five most reliable sources of evidence: the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), the International Evaluation of Education Achievement (IEA), the Young Adult Literacy Survey (YALS), the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), and the International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS). Together, these five groups of tests cover the gamut of ages from 9 to 25, and a full range of academic subjects.


Feminist Movement = 1968

Feminist movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Affirmative Action = 1968


In 1968, gender was added to the anti-discrimination list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action



Now if YOU want to show me that we have become somehow brighter since all of this was implemented, I'd be happy to read it.
 
Last edited:
TM: Here is one of the problems conservatives have with the system:

http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/05...-finalist.html

Quote:
The Cobb County, Ga., school board announced Thursday night that Dallas Superintendent Michael Hinojosa is their lone finalist for their superintendent's vacancy.

Georgia state law requires a 14-day public comment period before the school board can finalize the hiring.

Hinojosa would be leaving a $328,000-a-year job that he has held for six years for one The Dallas Morning News reports has paid a $208,000-a-year base salary.
http://parentadvocates.org/niceconte...articleID=3860
Quote:

Dr. Mike Moses resigned from the Dallas ISD superintendent's job after July 1, 2004. Undoubtedly he chose that date because of the retirement benefits he will receive. In Texas an educator's retirement benefits are figured on his top three years of service. In this case, Moses' top three years were as the superintendent of the Dallas ISD. (His salary was the highest superintendent's salary in the nation even though there were eleven school districts in the country which were bigger than Dallas ISD.) Moses' retirement benefits will amount to approximately $224,400 per year for the rest of his life.
Are these people in it for the life long cash payout, or for the kids' sake?

How can you support this? When they retire, the positions must be filled, those people will retire, and on and on. How many "educators" do you think taxpayers must fund for over a quarter of a million plus a year for life?
 
You have no right to deside for women what their life will be like.

They get to chose for themselves
The left supports women's freedom of choice -- only as long as the women choose what the left tells them to.

If she wants to choose a church school, or a tax shelter, or to carry her Down's baby to term, or to be a stay-at-home mom, or to vote Republican, she must be made to feel a traitor to her gender.
 

Forum List

Back
Top