Tea Party ... RACISTS

Just like I'd be insane to say there are no racists in the Dems, or the GOP.... this whole 'racism' crap is such a fucking pathetic attempt to dismiss millions of ordinary Americans that it's offensive.

I never bought into the racism thing, but the blind hatred is a big movement.

So vociferous dissent now equals blind hatred?

Do you remember this little chestnut?

[youtube]NJxmpTMGhU0[/youtube]

I suppose she was filled with blind hate when she said that.

No, blind hatred equals blind hatred. If Obama's a socialist than so is Reagan. So are 99.999% of Presidents. They've all taken taxes from somewhere and gave it somewhere else. Reagan did it too. Reagan had joker signs of him that said "Socialist?"

Blind hatred.
 
I never bought into the racism thing, but the blind hatred is a big movement.

So vociferous dissent now equals blind hatred?

Do you remember this little chestnut?

[youtube]NJxmpTMGhU0[/youtube]

I suppose she was filled with blind hate when she said that.

No, blind hatred equals blind hatred. If Obama's a socialist than so is Reagan. So are 99.999% of Presidents. They've all taken taxes from somewhere and gave it somewhere else. Reagan did it too. Reagan had joker signs of him that said "Socialist?"

Blind hatred.

So calling someone a socialist is blind hatred?
 
Chairman Mao and Babe Ruth?

Really???

Did the Babe murder millions of Yankee fans???


Mao was a mass-murderer. Nothing he has to say has any value to any decent rational person that can look at the big picture instead of cherry-picking the man's history.

Basically what you're saying is that everything is black and white and there's no gray area.

You can think like that and that's fine, but it's not right minded.

A Rapist can be a Picasso.

A Pedophile can be a Shakespeare.

A murderer can be a Dollar saving accountant.

That a person is inherently evil doesn't mean that every single thing they've ever done is null and void. That's not rational.
 
I have no doubt that not all tea party extremists are racists.

That does not mean this is not another redundant imbecilic thread.

I do kind of agree that yet another thread on the TEA parties is a tad like overkill but.... since the rabid lefties (note: not liberals or democrats) keep starting a new thread on every sentence uttered by anyone who claims an attachment to the TEA Parties, it seems reasonable that some people start a few in defense of them.

Fact is, there is no legitimate evidence either for or against the TEA parties and racism. Simply because many have been infiltrated by the rabid lefties for their own political purposes. When you have ACORN sending people, the SEUI sending people and the HuffPo calling for its readers to be 'citizen jounalists', they lose any credibility on legitimate opposition. One wonders what those volunteer 'citizen journalists' were instructed to do at these events. But when it comes to the tactics of organizations such as ACORN and the SEUI, I think we have the evidence to suggest that their methods were not in the interests of 'honest' feedback.

The majority of the Tea Partiers are not Republicans according to a recent Gallup Poll.


The last poll I saw said that about 49% were INDEPENDENTS and 43% are Conservatives with the rest being very disgruntled Dems.

The fact that 49% are Indis tells me that the Dems need to take heed. The Indi vote is what carried Barry over the top in 2008. If the Indi's desert en masse. The GOP will be the beneificiary. Providing the Tea Party movement doesnt' field a candidate.
 
So calling someone a socialist is blind hatred?

Well, yea, since I don't see you producing me the Reagan's a socialist signs.

Do you want me to show you taxes that Reagan took from the rich and gave to the poor, or is your contention that he'd never implement such a thing? I mean really, the whole Socialist thing makes no sense. If we could all be grown ups and speak like fair-minded intelligent-minded individuals about the country's ills, it would be easier to listen to different points of view. But to castigate the opposing views of yours as what they're NOT, with empty platitudes, and as inherently EVIL, well...................someone labeled as "EVIL!!!" isn't much going to want and come have a healthy chat with you now, is he/she?
 
When your response to all criticism is to cry "racism".... ya got nothing. The rally cry of the intellectually bankrupt.

Let 'em keep screaming racism. The more they use the word the less people pay attention... the "boy who cried wolf" syndrome on full display.
 
Last edited:
I'm still waiting on the justification for taking things that don't belong to you... when I grew up, that was called stealing. Socialists/Liberals/progressives on the other hand seem to think that it is ok.
 
When your response to all criticism is to cry "racism".... ya got nothing. The rally cry of the intellectually bankrupt.

Let 'em keep screaming racism. The more they use the word the less people pay attention... the "boy who cried wolf" syndrome on full display.

likewise if your response to everything is socialist communist marxist muslim
 
Overplaying the race card is just as detestable as actual racism. That being said, I believe there is an element of the anti-Obama crowd that is, in fact, racist. Taking that thought to its logical conclusion, every party and movement has its racists so you can't tag Tea Partiers for being more racist than anyone else.

In Montgomery Alabama the only people who are TeaParty Patriots are white, middle to lower income, and bordering on redneck. That's just a fact where I am. I'm sure it's different across the nation.

O'Reilly did have someone make an interesting point last night on his show...the TeaParty movement is becoming the anti-government (either Repub or Dem) movement...so ignoring them comes at a political price. I'm not sure if I'm just being brain-washed, but the party that I believed I'd seen with my own eyes as extremist here in Alabama is becoming more mainstream.
 
Chairman Mao and Babe Ruth?

Really???

Did the Babe murder millions of Yankee fans???


Mao was a mass-murderer. Nothing he has to say has any value to any decent rational person that can look at the big picture instead of cherry-picking the man's history.

Basically what you're saying is that everything is black and white and there's no gray area.

You can think like that and that's fine, but it's not right minded.

A Rapist can be a Picasso.

A Pedophile can be a Shakespeare.

A murderer can be a Dollar saving accountant.

That a person is inherently evil doesn't mean that every single thing they've ever done is null and void. That's not rational.

I admire Picasso's work but don't have to live like he does.

I can read Shakespeare...but what he did back hundreds of years ago has no effect on my life.

Mao's political views are the problem here...not his sexual deviance or his artistic talents.

What Mao believed in shouldn't be something to admire because the byproducts of those beliefs caused the deaths of over 70 million Chinese. Anyone who wants to institute his bullshit beliefs must want the same for us.
 
I do kind of agree that yet another thread on the TEA parties is a tad like overkill but.... since the rabid lefties (note: not liberals or democrats) keep starting a new thread on every sentence uttered by anyone who claims an attachment to the TEA Parties, it seems reasonable that some people start a few in defense of them.

Fact is, there is no legitimate evidence either for or against the TEA parties and racism. Simply because many have been infiltrated by the rabid lefties for their own political purposes. When you have ACORN sending people, the SEUI sending people and the HuffPo calling for its readers to be 'citizen jounalists', they lose any credibility on legitimate opposition. One wonders what those volunteer 'citizen journalists' were instructed to do at these events. But when it comes to the tactics of organizations such as ACORN and the SEUI, I think we have the evidence to suggest that their methods were not in the interests of 'honest' feedback.

The majority of the Tea Partiers are not Republicans according to a recent Gallup Poll.


The last poll I saw said that about 49% were INDEPENDENTS and 43% are Conservatives with the rest being very disgruntled Dems.

The fact that 49% are Indis tells me that the Dems need to take heed. The Indi vote is what carried Barry over the top in 2008. If the Indi's desert en masse. The GOP will be the beneificiary. Providing the Tea Party movement doesnt' field a candidate.

I believe that's the same poll I seen with 8 percent being democrat. I myself am an independent and like many others I consider myself a conservative.
 
Chairman Mao and Babe Ruth?

Really???

Did the Babe murder millions of Yankee fans???


Mao was a mass-murderer. Nothing he has to say has any value to any decent rational person that can look at the big picture instead of cherry-picking the man's history.

Basically what you're saying is that everything is black and white and there's no gray area.

You can think like that and that's fine, but it's not right minded.

A Rapist can be a Picasso.

A Pedophile can be a Shakespeare.

A murderer can be a Dollar saving accountant.

That a person is inherently evil doesn't mean that every single thing they've ever done is null and void. That's not rational.

I admire Picasso's work but don't have to live like he does.

I can read Shakespeare...but what he did back hundreds of years ago has no effect on my life.

Mao's political views are the problem here...not his sexual deviance or his artistic talents.

What Mao believed in shouldn't be something to admire because the byproducts of those beliefs caused the deaths of over 70 million Chinese. Anyone who wants to institute his bullshit beliefs must want the same for us.

See, I don't know how you can honestly believe this if you heard her whokle speech is all. I'm all for having a debate on political issues and such, but when you begin to believe shit that clearly isn't even there, there's not much to talk about. You believe what you believe, and I haven't observed the same.
 
When your response to all criticism is to cry "racism".... ya got nothing. The rally cry of the intellectually bankrupt.

Let 'em keep screaming racism. The more they use the word the less people pay attention... the "boy who cried wolf" syndrome on full display.

likewise if your response to everything is socialist communist marxist muslim

Only when it fits....which it does.

It's clear Obama practices Marxism.

Many of the Democrats in positions of leadership are card carrying Communists.

Obama and many of his people do have ties to Muslim organizations and do show an obvious disdain for Israel.
 
I never bought into the racism thing, but the blind hatred is a big movement.

Well...in order to make the hatred angle work they had to lie about the racist thing.

So...don't you think they could be lying about the hatred thing as well??

People a just plain scared of what this government has in store for us. Whether this fear is justified only time will tell.

Umm, no. I see the signs, I hear the empty rhetoric. The empty platitudes where substance doesn't follow. That's where the term blind comes into play.

Blind hatred my ass. Every movement, left or right, had wingnuts in it. period.

Empty rehtoric??? Nothing empty about protesting a HC bill thats going to cost all of us big time. A bill that the majority of Americans DID NOT WANT. Nothing empty about protesting the bailouts and the use of our tax dollar for same. Nothing empty about protesting the fact that our elected officials completely ignored the will of the people. Nothing empty about protesting the way this bill was rammed down our throats. Lots to protest there.

You consider that empty rhetoric??

What the Tea Party represents to me is Americans. Yes Americans who are sick of the way the Govt is spending their money. They are protesting Barry's agenda. They utilizing their first ammendment rights to protest. The lefties utilize that Right all the time as is their right.

Demonizing the Tea Partiers. Calling them racist because they dare to protest Barry Boys agenda is kinda silly in my book. It sure ain't gonna change anything either. I laugh at protesters being called racist. Jeeze. They need to come up with something better than that.

Hating someone or something takes a great deal of effort and quite frankly I wouldn't consider OL'BO worth the effort. LOL
 
The majority of the Tea Partiers are not Republicans according to a recent Gallup Poll.


The last poll I saw said that about 49% were INDEPENDENTS and 43% are Conservatives with the rest being very disgruntled Dems.

The fact that 49% are Indis tells me that the Dems need to take heed. The Indi vote is what carried Barry over the top in 2008. If the Indi's desert en masse. The GOP will be the beneificiary. Providing the Tea Party movement doesnt' field a candidate.

I believe that's the same poll I seen with 8 percent being democrat. I myself am an independent and like many others I consider myself a conservative.

Ditto.
 
So calling someone a socialist is blind hatred?

Well, yea, since I don't see you producing me the Reagan's a socialist signs.

Do you want me to show you taxes that Reagan took from the rich and gave to the poor, or is your contention that he'd never implement such a thing? I mean really, the whole Socialist thing makes no sense. If we could all be grown ups and speak like fair-minded intelligent-minded individuals about the country's ills, it would be easier to listen to different points of view. But to castigate the opposing views of yours as what they're NOT, with empty platitudes, and as inherently EVIL, well...................someone labeled as "EVIL!!!" isn't much going to want and come have a healthy chat with you now, is he/she?

FYI Reagan is dead. And where have I ever used Reagan as a standard? Socialist policies existed before him and have only gotten more numerous. So calling almost any politician a socialist is not blind hatred it's probably closer to the truth than not.

The more numerous socialist policies become, the less free we are because the government exerts more power over our daily lives. it's not a difficult concept.

And compared to the last few presidents, Obama is the most socialist.

GW expanded government more than any other president in the last 4 decades except one (and we kn ow who that one is ) and you have never heard me defend GW.

I do however defend everyone's right to speak out as loud and as obnoxiously as they want.

And were you condemning people when they were calling GW a Nazi?
 
Last edited:
Ah , Let the hate shine through and why not a Democratic Party House Representative.

My bet is that he will be hailed by his Party and the liberal hate mongering news media ..

Democrats.. spread the HATE...... then play the victim...:cuckoo:


Rep. Steve Cohen is the latest public official to suggest Tea Party supporters have a racist agenda, telling an Internet radio show last week that the activists have shown a "hardcore angry side" of the country, only "without robes and hoods."

On a program called "The Young Turks" on Thursday, the Democratic Tennessee congressman said Tea Party groups show "opposition to African Americans, hostility toward gays, hostility to anybody who wasn't just a clone of George Wallace's fan club." Wallace is the late former Alabama governor, and presidential candidate, well-known for opposing desegregation.

FOXNews.com - Rep. Cohen: Tea Partiers Show 'Hardcore' Anger Without 'Robes and Hoods'

Has Sen Byrd weighed in on this one?:eusa_whistle:
 
Ah , Let the hate shine through and why not a Democratic Party House Representative.

My bet is that he will be hailed by his Party and the liberal hate mongering news media ..

Democrats.. spread the HATE...... then play the victim...:cuckoo:


Rep. Steve Cohen is the latest public official to suggest Tea Party supporters have a racist agenda, telling an Internet radio show last week that the activists have shown a "hardcore angry side" of the country, only "without robes and hoods."

On a program called "The Young Turks" on Thursday, the Democratic Tennessee congressman said Tea Party groups show "opposition to African Americans, hostility toward gays, hostility to anybody who wasn't just a clone of George Wallace's fan club." Wallace is the late former Alabama governor, and presidential candidate, well-known for opposing desegregation.

FOXNews.com - Rep. Cohen: Tea Partiers Show 'Hardcore' Anger Without 'Robes and Hoods'

Has Sen Byrd weighed in on this one?:eusa_whistle:

I don't think he can get through a speech now without shitting himself or wandering off mindlessly.
 
Ah , Let the hate shine through and why not a Democratic Party House Representative.

My bet is that he will be hailed by his Party and the liberal hate mongering news media ..

Democrats.. spread the HATE...... then play the victim...:cuckoo:


Rep. Steve Cohen is the latest public official to suggest Tea Party supporters have a racist agenda, telling an Internet radio show last week that the activists have shown a "hardcore angry side" of the country, only "without robes and hoods."

On a program called "The Young Turks" on Thursday, the Democratic Tennessee congressman said Tea Party groups show "opposition to African Americans, hostility toward gays, hostility to anybody who wasn't just a clone of George Wallace's fan club." Wallace is the late former Alabama governor, and presidential candidate, well-known for opposing desegregation.

FOXNews.com - Rep. Cohen: Tea Partiers Show 'Hardcore' Anger Without 'Robes and Hoods'

Has Sen Byrd weighed in on this one?:eusa_whistle:

I don't think he can get through a speech now without shitting himself or wandering off mindlessly.

Odd how the left can't ever provide any REAL logic and reason to their doings, just smokescreen with accusations.
 
No, like the TEA Parties are not a bunch of racists. I mean that the dems would rather accuse people of racism than deal with genuine issues.

Lemme guess...issues like Obama's a Muslim and is NOT eligible to be President, issues like Obama's not an American and therefore is NOT eligible to be President, issues like Obama's not a Christian, therefore is NOT eligible to be President, issues like Birth-Certificate proof, issues like Death Panels, issues like Obama wants to KILL GRANDMA?

You mean important, sensible and intelligent issues like that CG?
 

Forum List

Back
Top