TEA PARTY RACISM: What The Media Won't Show You About Teabagger Racism

[casper4020322]

What I saw from that video were people who do not want a Black man as their President and that is very sad. We are in the year 2010 and that video proves that not a whole lot has changed since the 1700's. There are White people in America who believe that the Black man is far beneath them and should not hold a position as high up as the President. It doesn't matter if it's Barack Obama, it could be any African American. A lot of White people relate to Bill Cosby but for him to become President would still be a no-no. What about Morgan Freeman or Colin Powell who are well liked? Blacks have to stay in their places which is far beneath a person whose skin color is a lot lighter than theirs...so what if God said to love your neighbors? Who is he?

 

[bodecea]

These people are really very civil American patriots, right?

YouTube - TEA PARTY RACISM: What The Media Won't Show You About Teabagger Racism

ROFL... So because Hussein is recognized as a Muslim

and that there's no place for a Muslim President of the US

Anyone remember that part of the Constitution?

, that indicates that the obeserver is a RACIST?

No...but your comments certainly make YOU one.

ROFLMNAO...

Indeed.

Ya can't hide idiocy...

You are certainly proof of that.

Let me help ya out here Bass, There are no Leftist Americans... and there's no way Americans will vote for a Muslim for President.

Which is why The Brown Clown decided to LIE and declare herself a Christian Moderate.

The simple fact is that had she declared herself a Muslim Leftists.. she'd still be a junior part-time senator.

As was said befor, Ya can't hide idiocy.

 

[Flaylo]

I'm pretty confident that the MSM would LOVE to show any racism.... if there was any to show.

But, I see that, yet again, little gay Charlie is behaving like a shitstain.

Basically you know in your heart that the Tea baggers are lunatics. Calling the Bass a faggot isn't going to change that.

What I now know, Charlie, is that you use your race as a weapon. I dislike people who use race as a weapon. I find it offensive - from whites or blacks. And I find it offensive that people misrepresent the views of the TEA party because you dislike what we say. You're the racist, Charlie. Not us.

You called Charlie, an African American, a shitstain, that makes you a racist. I always knew you were a covert and latent racist just like the rest of the Tea Bastards.

 

[California Girl]

Basically you know in your heart that the Tea baggers are lunatics. Calling the Bass a faggot isn't going to change that.

What I now know, Charlie, is that you use your race as a weapon. I dislike people who use race as a weapon. I find it offensive - from whites or blacks. And I find it offensive that people misrepresent the views of the TEA party because you dislike what we say. You're the racist, Charlie. Not us.

You called Charlie, an African American, a shitstain, that makes you a racist. I always knew you were a covert and latent racist just like the rest of the Tea Bastards.

You total fucking moron. I call anyone who refers to the TEA parties as teabaggers a shitstain... whatever race that poster happens to be is immaterial. You're problem is you see racism when there is none. That makes you the racist, idiot boy.

 

[Flaylo]

What I now know, Charlie, is that you use your race as a weapon. I dislike people who use race as a weapon. I find it offensive - from whites or blacks. And I find it offensive that people misrepresent the views of the TEA party because you dislike what we say. You're the racist, Charlie. Not us.

You called Charlie, an African American, a shitstain, that makes you a racist. I always knew you were a covert and latent racist just like the rest of the Tea Bastards.

You total fucking moron. I call anyone who refers to the TEA parties as teabaggers a shitstain... whatever race that poster happens to be is immaterial. You're problem is you see racism when there is none. That makes you the racist, idiot boy.

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Bush LIED this country to war.

He told the American people lies to get them to sacrafice BLOOD for his political motives.

NOTHING in the world is more horrible than that one.

BTW Obama is as American as you.

If Bush lied then so did the Democrats include Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, John Edwards, Robert Byrd, Henry Waxman, Tom Daschle, and Nancy Pelosi among many, many others.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham, December 2002

"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." -- Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." -- John Kerry, October 9, 2002

"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

 

[California Girl]

You called Charlie, an African American, a shitstain, that makes you a racist. I always knew you were a covert and latent racist just like the rest of the Tea Bastards.

You total fucking moron. I call anyone who refers to the TEA parties as teabaggers a shitstain... whatever race that poster happens to be is immaterial. You're problem is you see racism when there is none. That makes you the racist, idiot boy.

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

You completely stupid little shit. You have no evidence of what I wanted to call Charlie. Asshole. I never, ever call anyone the n word. It wouldn't even enter my head. Yet it does enter yours. That makes you the racist.

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You total fucking moron. I call anyone who refers to the TEA parties as teabaggers a shitstain... whatever race that poster happens to be is immaterial. You're problem is you see racism when there is none. That makes you the racist, idiot boy.

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

The race card is the only card they have.

 

[Flaylo]

You total fucking moron. I call anyone who refers to the TEA parties as teabaggers a shitstain... whatever race that poster happens to be is immaterial. You're problem is you see racism when there is none. That makes you the racist, idiot boy.

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

I have an issue with your racism, not your color, I like white women, in Germany there's nothing but white women and I enjoy them like they enjoy me, freely mixing with other races is not a problem, I speak their language, so I don't have a problem with your color, you have a problem with my CINC's color like all the Tea Bastards do.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

I have an issue with your racism, not your color, I like white women, in Germany there's nothing but white women and I enjoy them like they enjoy me, freely mixing with other races is not a problem, I speak their language, so I don't have a problem with your color, you have a problem with my CINC's color like all the Tea Bastards do.

Flaylo, how many Tea Party events have you attended?

 

[California Girl]

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

I have an issue with your racism, not your color, I like white women, in Germany there's nothing but white women and I enjoy them like they enjoy me, freely mixing with other races is not a problem, I speak their language, so I don't have a problem with your color, you have a problem with my CINC's color like all the Tea Bastards do.

You're a little shitstain... not because of your color, but because you have no fucking idea about the TEA parties, other than what you are told what to think by the MSM. You are the ractist, little man. You ASSUMED what I meant. You decide that I wanted to call Charlie the n word.... Never, in my life, have I used that word.... To have some half assed moronic punk tell me what I meant - is beyond laughable. You have no fucking clue who I am or what my values are and you decide I would call someone the n word. Fucking little moron.

Even your 'I like white women' is racist. Why can you not just like people? What the fuck does their color have to do with anything? You're a fucking racist and you don't even notice it.

 

[Flaylo]

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

I have an issue with your racism, not your color, I like white women, in Germany there's nothing but white women and I enjoy them like they enjoy me, freely mixing with other races is not a problem, I speak their language, so I don't have a problem with your color, you have a problem with my CINC's color like all the Tea Bastards do.

You're a little shitstain... not because of your color, but because you have no fucking idea about the TEA parties, other than what you are told what to think by the MSM. You are the ractist, little man. You ASSUMED what I meant. You decide that I wanted to call Charlie the n word.... Never, in my life, have I used that word.... To have some half assed moronic punk tell me what I meant - is beyond laughable. You have no fucking clue who I am or what my values are and you decide I would call someone the n word. Fucking little moron.

Even your 'I like white women' is racist. Why can you not just like people? What the fuck does their color have to do with anything? You're a fucking racist and you don't even notice it.

Saying I like white women is racist when I said I believe in races freely mixing? You're a numbskull, you wanted to call Charlie a n, I saw it in your post, you wanted to say it so bad, you have to prove to me that you're not racist and I'm not a little man, lol, you have no idea what you're talking about there.

 

[California Girl]

I have an issue with your racism, not your color, I like white women, in Germany there's nothing but white women and I enjoy them like they enjoy me, freely mixing with other races is not a problem, I speak their language, so I don't have a problem with your color, you have a problem with my CINC's color like all the Tea Bastards do.

You're a little shitstain... not because of your color, but because you have no fucking idea about the TEA parties, other than what you are told what to think by the MSM. You are the ractist, little man. You ASSUMED what I meant. You decide that I wanted to call Charlie the n word.... Never, in my life, have I used that word.... To have some half assed moronic punk tell me what I meant - is beyond laughable. You have no fucking clue who I am or what my values are and you decide I would call someone the n word. Fucking little moron.

Even your 'I like white women' is racist. Why can you not just like people? What the fuck does their color have to do with anything? You're a fucking racist and you don't even notice it.

Saying I like white women is racist when I said I believe in races freely mixing? You're a numbskull, you wanted to call Charlie a n, I saw it in your post, you wanted to say it so bad, you have to prove to me that you're not racist and I'm not a little man, lol, you have no idea what you're talking about there.

Prove it. Prove that I wanted to call Charlie anything other than what I called him. You make the accusation. You back it up. You are a little man.... anyone who uses the race card to score cheap partisan points is a little man. That's you, Fail. Prove it.... because - yet again - you make a fool of yourself by accusing me of something you cannot prove.

 

[Truthmatters]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Bush LIED this country to war.

He told the American people lies to get them to sacrafice BLOOD for his political motives.

NOTHING in the world is more horrible than that one.

BTW Obama is as American as you.

If Bush lied then so did the Democrats include Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, John Edwards, Robert Byrd, Henry Waxman, Tom Daschle, and Nancy Pelosi among many, many others.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham, December 2002

"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." -- Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." -- John Kerry, October 9, 2002

"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

And who was it that gave them their intell reports you complete fool?

 

[Flaylo]

You're a little shitstain... not because of your color, but because you have no fucking idea about the TEA parties, other than what you are told what to think by the MSM. You are the ractist, little man. You ASSUMED what I meant. You decide that I wanted to call Charlie the n word.... Never, in my life, have I used that word.... To have some half assed moronic punk tell me what I meant - is beyond laughable. You have no fucking clue who I am or what my values are and you decide I would call someone the n word. Fucking little moron.

Even your 'I like white women' is racist. Why can you not just like people? What the fuck does their color have to do with anything? You're a fucking racist and you don't even notice it.

Saying I like white women is racist when I said I believe in races freely mixing? You're a numbskull, you wanted to call Charlie a n, I saw it in your post, you wanted to say it so bad, you have to prove to me that you're not racist and I'm not a little man, lol, you have no idea what you're talking about there.

Prove it. Prove that I wanted to call Charlie anything other than what I called him. You make the accusation. You back it up. You are a little man.... anyone who uses the race card to score cheap partisan points is a little man. That's you, Fail. Prove it.... because - yet again - you make a fool of yourself by accusing me of something you cannot prove.

Maybe its just my instinct but it sure sounded like you wanted to call him the no word, if I was wrong corrected I stand, OTOH, you called me a racist and thats not true. You have no proof I'm racist and I have no concrete you are racist, just leave it at that and stop being mad at me liking white women, there's nothing wrong with that, I like all races of women.

 

[California Girl]

Basically you know in your heart that the Tea baggers are lunatics. Calling the Bass a faggot isn't going to change that.

What I now know, Charlie, is that you use your race as a weapon. I dislike people who use race as a weapon. I find it offensive - from whites or blacks. And I find it offensive that people misrepresent the views of the TEA party because you dislike what we say. You're the racist, Charlie. Not us.

You see NO racism anywhere, your blind to it.

I'm certainly not blind to racism. And, unless you know my life, I would suggest you don't make stupid assumptions about others.... You have a habit of doing that.... Idiot.

 

[California Girl]

Saying I like white women is racist when I said I believe in races freely mixing? You're a numbskull, you wanted to call Charlie a n, I saw it in your post, you wanted to say it so bad, you have to prove to me that you're not racist and I'm not a little man, lol, you have no idea what you're talking about there.

Prove it. Prove that I wanted to call Charlie anything other than what I called him. You make the accusation. You back it up. You are a little man.... anyone who uses the race card to score cheap partisan points is a little man. That's you, Fail. Prove it.... because - yet again - you make a fool of yourself by accusing me of something you cannot prove.

Maybe its just my instinct but it sure sounded like you wanted to call him the no word, if I was wrong corrected I stand, OTOH, you called me a racist and thats not true. You have no proof I'm racist and I have no concrete you are racist, just leave it at that and stop being mad at me liking white women, there's nothing wrong with that, I like all races of women.

Fuck you, moron. You fucking well are a racist.... because you accuse anyone who you know to be white and who disagrees with your view of being a racist. That, my little man, is racist.

You will never, ever have evidence that I am a racist... because I am not so there can be no evidence. In fact.... on this very forum there is a poster who refers to Obama as the 'brown clown'.... now, if you go find that thread, you will find that I - along with most posters here - took offense at that term as being racist. That is racism, little man... not calling someone who insults the TEA parties a shitstain. You're far too quick to judge people.

If you knew more about me, you would know just how big an ass you just made of yourself. And, even now, you are not man enough to withdraw it and apologize.... So not only are you a racist, you are also a coward. That's twice in your short time on this board that I have had evidence of both.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Bush LIED this country to war.

He told the American people lies to get them to sacrafice BLOOD for his political motives.

NOTHING in the world is more horrible than that one.

BTW Obama is as American as you.

If Bush lied then so did the Democrats include Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, John Edwards, Robert Byrd, Henry Waxman, Tom Daschle, and Nancy Pelosi among many, many others.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham, December 2002

"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." -- Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." -- John Kerry, October 9, 2002

"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

And who was it that gave them their intell reports you complete fool?

The same people that gave Bush the intel.

But I supposed you think Bush fabricated it all by himself. If so then it should be easy enough for you to prove.

I'll be waiting for your evidence.



While your at it look at these quotes:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is useing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Notice the dates. All were prior to the 2003 Iraq War as well as many were made prior to Bush' presidency. Do yourself a favor and stop drinking the kool-aid.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Prove it. Prove that I wanted to call Charlie anything other than what I called him. You make the accusation. You back it up. You are a little man.... anyone who uses the race card to score cheap partisan points is a little man. That's you, Fail. Prove it.... because - yet again - you make a fool of yourself by accusing me of something you cannot prove.

Maybe its just my instinct but it sure sounded like you wanted to call him the no word, if I was wrong corrected I stand, OTOH, you called me a racist and thats not true. You have no proof I'm racist and I have no concrete you are racist, just leave it at that and stop being mad at me liking white women, there's nothing wrong with that, I like all races of women.

Fuck you, moron. You fucking well are a racist.... because you accuse anyone who you know to be white and who disagrees with your view of being a racist. That, my little man, is racist.

You will never, ever have evidence that I am a racist... because I am not so there can be no evidence. In fact.... on this very forum there is a poster who refers to Obama as the 'brown clown'.... now, if you go find that thread, you will find that I - along with most posters here - took offense at that term as being racist. That is racism, little man... not calling someone who insults the TEA parties a shitstain. You're far too quick to judge people.

If you knew more about me, you would know just how big an ass you just made of yourself. And, even now, you are not man enough to withdraw it and apologize.... So not only are you a racist, you are also a coward. That's twice in your short time on this board that I have had evidence of both.

You're not a racist and Flaylo likes white women, the Bass senses a love connection here. You and Flaylo are having love fights, do you fancy him because it sounds like he fancies you.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Eventhough I self identify as black, my mother is a blond-haired, blue-eyed German woman who's family came originally from Poland, how the fuck could I be a racist you stupid ass little girl? I even spend time with my mother's family while I'm here. You wanted to call Charlie the n word but instead accused him of using his race as a weapon at the exact minute you wanted to say the n word. I saw it in the tone of your post.

I don't give a shit what color your Mom is. I don't give a shit what color you are. Clearly, you have an issue with my color.... THAT makes you a racist, little man. Just like Charlie (who I actually like) is a shitstain - because anyone who calls the TEA Partiers teabaggers to insult us is a shitstain. It is not his color that makes him a shitstain, it is his attitude. But.... nice try at playing the race card, moron.

I have an issue with your racism, not your color, I like white women, in Germany there's nothing but white women and I enjoy them like they enjoy me, freely mixing with other races is not a problem, I speak their language, so I don't have a problem with your color, you have a problem with my CINC's color like all the Tea Bastards do.

There's nothing wrong with mixing races and yes, the Teabaggers act very moronic, but what does any of that have to do with you liking white women? Do you like black women?