What I have found amazing on this board--and on many topics--is that liberals will post a new thread--in relation--to tea party news--give out a paragraph that they like--and many tea party members and conservatives do not actually READ the entire linked article. If you don't read their linked article you are caught defending what paragraph they wanted you to know about.
Here's a good example of that:
There was a thread on this board posted--on the general political board that was titled--TEA PARTY MEMBERS LESS POPULAR THAN ATHEISTS AND MUSLIMS.
If you would have read the ENTIRE linked article--this is a survey--that was taken during 2006/2007--that the liberals DID not want to you to know. So they cherry picked the article and pulled out other paragraphs that benefited their argument.
Here it is is:
Lib Professors Claim Tea Party (Fiscal Conservatives) Less Popular Than Muslims, Atheists | The Gateway Pundit
In another thread tea party members were accused of adding in 1 billion dollars in pork. But if you actually read the article--the date was Dec. 2, 2010 and prior to any tea party members being seated in congress. The article also specifically states that Michelle Bachmann and 13 other representatives had not asked for any pork--yet you are made to believe that they had.
Sorry--I can't find that link--it's here somewhere though.
SO PLEASE--make certain that you actually READ the entire LINKED ARTICLE that liberals start on THREADS or replies before replying to them. Otherwise we see a 10-20 page reply--on what they want to discuss--when they can be taken out on the 1st page by their own linked article.
Liberals will spend hours and hours on deception--especially when it comes to the Tea Party movement in this country--we can spend a little time reading their entire linked articles---before responding.
Lib Professors Claim Tea Party (Fiscal Conservatives) Less Popular Than Muslims, Atheists | The Gateway Pundit
Here's a good example of that:
There was a thread on this board posted--on the general political board that was titled--TEA PARTY MEMBERS LESS POPULAR THAN ATHEISTS AND MUSLIMS.
If you would have read the ENTIRE linked article--this is a survey--that was taken during 2006/2007--that the liberals DID not want to you to know. So they cherry picked the article and pulled out other paragraphs that benefited their argument.
Here it is is:
Lib Professors Claim Tea Party (Fiscal Conservatives) Less Popular Than Muslims, Atheists | The Gateway Pundit
In another thread tea party members were accused of adding in 1 billion dollars in pork. But if you actually read the article--the date was Dec. 2, 2010 and prior to any tea party members being seated in congress. The article also specifically states that Michelle Bachmann and 13 other representatives had not asked for any pork--yet you are made to believe that they had.
Sorry--I can't find that link--it's here somewhere though.
SO PLEASE--make certain that you actually READ the entire LINKED ARTICLE that liberals start on THREADS or replies before replying to them. Otherwise we see a 10-20 page reply--on what they want to discuss--when they can be taken out on the 1st page by their own linked article.
Liberals will spend hours and hours on deception--especially when it comes to the Tea Party movement in this country--we can spend a little time reading their entire linked articles---before responding.
Lib Professors Claim Tea Party (Fiscal Conservatives) Less Popular Than Muslims, Atheists | The Gateway Pundit
Attachments
Last edited: