Tea party less popular than Muslims

[Truthmatters]

Survey



In an op-ed article in the New York Times, Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and David E. Campbell, a political scientist at Notre Dame, say they have collected data indicating that the tea party is "less popular than much maligned groups like 'atheists' and 'Muslims.'"

 

[blastoff]

Guess it must have been all those Muslims who kicked the dimocrats' asses last November, huh?

 

[Full-Auto]

Survey



In an op-ed article in the New York Times, Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and David E. Campbell, a political scientist at Notre Dame, say they have collected data indicating that the tea party is "less popular than much maligned groups like 'atheists' and 'Muslims.'"

Post the data

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Survey



In an op-ed article in the New York Times, Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and David E. Campbell, a political scientist at Notre Dame, say they have collected data indicating that the tea party is "less popular than much maligned groups like 'atheists' and 'Muslims.'"

You missed part of the article.

But Campbell says the tea party was really an afterthought in their research.

"We didn't go into this study to look at the tea party," Campbell said in an interview with The Ticket.

 

[Oddball]

No data or methodology supplied.

Just the old "Tea Partiers are a bunch of racist religious nuts" stereotype buried near the end of the piece.

Nothing to see here.

 

[Lovebears65]

Survey



In an op-ed article in the New York Times, Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and David E. Campbell, a political scientist at Notre Dame, say they have collected data indicating that the tea party is "less popular than much maligned groups like 'atheists' and 'Muslims.'"

You missed part of the article.

But Campbell says the tea party was really an afterthought in their research.

"We didn't go into this study to look at the tea party," Campbell said in an interview with The Ticket.

LOL anything to throw the Tea Party under the bus!

 

[blastoff]

No data or methodology supplied.

Just the old "Tea Partiers are a bunch of racist religious nuts" stereotype buried near the end of the piece.

Nothing to see here.

Truthmatters doesn't get involved in truth matters.

 

[Jarhead]

New Thread

Truthmatters less popular than hemmeroids.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Truthdoesn'tmatter lying again, go figure.

 

[Mad Scientist]

From the article:

...in fairness, it's perhaps difficult to generalize on the movement's origins from a poll sample of 3,000 respondents.

 

[ogibillm]

1) Not truthmatter's survey.
2) Because the purpose of the survey was not to learn about the tea party doesn't mean that once added to the questionaire they would not learn anything about them

 

[Truthmatters]

Survey



In an op-ed article in the New York Times, Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and David E. Campbell, a political scientist at Notre Dame, say they have collected data indicating that the tea party is "less popular than much maligned groups like 'atheists' and 'Muslims.'"

You missed part of the article.

But Campbell says the tea party was really an afterthought in their research.

"We didn't go into this study to look at the tea party," Campbell said in an interview with The Ticket.

Because when they started the study there was NO tea party.


Its a long term study

 

[ogibillm]

From the article:

...in fairness, it's perhaps difficult to generalize on the movement's origins from a poll sample of 3,000 respondents.

what is your point? i'm sure you posted that to make a point of some sort but it's lost on me.

 

[Truthmatters]

The professors were following up on research they conducted in 2006 and 2007 for their book "American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us" and decided to add the tea party and atheists to their list of survey queries. By going back to many of the same respondents, the professors gleaned several interesting facts about the tea party.

One of their more surprising findings, Campbell concedes, (and one drawing national attention) is that the tea party drew a lower approval rating than Muslims and atheists. That put the tea party below 23 other entries--including Barack Obama, Sarah Palin, Republicans and Democrats--that the professors included on their survey of "a representative sample of 3,000 Americans."

 

[cootydog]

oh sure just as expected. The left always lies, always spin everything. The only thing I believe coming from the left is that they will say or do anything to win the public. The Tea Party is going nowhere and thats whats got the liberals so upset the harder they try to spin everything onto the Tea Party they are making more people aware and actually doing the Tea Party a favor. Its nice to see they have the liberals sweating it out like they do.

 

[daws101]

Tea Party

 

[lilbug]

Survey’s surprising finding: tea party less popular than atheists and Muslims
By Rachel Rose Hartman

Political Reporter

A Philadelphia tea party rally July 4 (Joseph Kaczmarek/AP)
In an op-ed article in the New York Times, Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and David E. Campbell, a political scientist at Notre Dame, say they have collected data indicating that the tea party is "less popular than much maligned groups like 'atheists' and 'Muslims.'"

But Campbell says the tea party was really an afterthought in their research."We didn't go into this study to look at the tea party," Campbell said in an interview with The Ticket.

The professors were following up on research they conducted in 2006 and 2007 for their book "American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us and decided to add the tea party and atheists to their list of survey queries. By going back to many of the same respondents, the professors gleaned several interesting facts about the tea party.

One of their more surprising findings, Campbell concedes, (and one drawing national attention) is that the tea party drew a lower approval rating than Muslims and atheists. That put the tea party below 23 other entries--including Barack Obama, Sarah Palin, Republicans and Democrats--that the professors included on their survey of "a representative sample of 3,000 Americans."

By examining which respondents became supporters of the tea party, Campbell and Putnam's survey "casts doubt on the tea party's 'origin story,' " they write in the Times--though, in fairness, it's perhaps difficult to generalize on the movement's origins from a poll sample of 3,000 respondents.Early tea partiers were described as "nonpartisan political neophytes," Campbell and Putnam write, but their findings showed that tea partiers were "highly partisan Republicans" who were more likely than others to have contacted government officials.

"They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do," they went on.

In addition to being socially conservative, the study found a close tie between religion and the tea party, whose supporters seek out "deeply religious" elected officials.

"This helps to explain why candidates like Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry are just as much about the public presentation of themselves as religious people as fiscal conservatives," Campbell told The Ticket.

Campbell said Tuesday that he does not regard his research as politically motivated. "I don't have a particular dog in this or any other political fight," he said.

We actually didn't go into this study primarily to look at the tea party," he told the Ticket. "The primary purpose of the study is to update what we learned about religion in America."


****
The point I believe that was lost on you earlier is that this article is loaded with disclaimers regarding the Tea Party, stating they were not the primary focus of the study and that this study was primarily focused on religion in America.

A survey started in 2006/2007 with the Tea Party, not being religious or atheist group, not being the primary focus, and being tossed in as an after thought has little validity. It's just political spin.

The Tea Party is irrelevant to this study and should not have even been included in this study at all.

 

[JMadison]

And the purpose of a thread like this? To help conservatives lose faith in what they stand for. Forget it baby!

 

[daws101]

And the purpose of a thread like this? To help conservatives lose faith in what they stand for. Forget it baby!

faith is a major part of the problem!

 

[del]

From the article:

...in fairness, it's perhaps difficult to generalize on the movement's origins from a poll sample of 3,000 respondents.

what is your point? i'm sure you posted that to make a point of some sort but it's lost on me.

shocker