easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,048
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #81
The only source of this "do not prosecute" list is Lutsenko.You need to back up your "facts" with references.He needs to testify so that his actual ties to joe biden and adam schiff as well as the obama administration can be put on record......as well as his part in the Russian hoax....
FACT:
Democrats met with corrupt former Ukrainian officials and illegally acquired dirt on Trump and his associates and used that to alter / affect the 2016 election.
FACT:
Former VP and 'Newly-Appointed' (then) Obama Point Man for Ukraine Joe Biden extorted the Ukraine PM and forced him to shut down a Ukrainian investigation of Hunter Biden's boss days before the Ukraine Prosecutor stated he was going to call Hunter Biden to testify. Papa Joe BRAGGED about doing so during his videotaped confession.
FACT:
The 'Whistleblower' is NOT a 'whistleblower' as per the requirements to be designated as such in the Whistleblower Act (the law).
FACT:
HEARSAY is NOT 'EVIDENCE', and the admitted, politically partisan, Trump-hating NON-Whistleblower Brennan-disciple CIA spy has made it perfectly clear they never had any 1st-hand account information.
FACT:
It has been made perfectly clear than not 1 (ONE) person who has come forward to testify in this hearing or who has any part in this treasonous circus has any 1st-hand account information regarding the false accusations levied against the President. They - to include the whistleblower - are NOT 'Witnesses' because they did NOT WITNESS anything.
FACT:
There is no evidence.
- The only 'evidence / witnesses' are those who participated in the phone call, the Ukraine PM and US President, and the original unaltered transcript. The US President said it never happened. The Ukraine PM said it never happened. The transcript debunks the Democrats' false narrative.
FACT:
There is No 'whistleblower'
-- Schiff admitted - after lying about it - that he and his staff had talked to the Whistleblower...then declared 2 days ago he doesn't know who the 'whistleblower' is. After lying for 2+ years about having direct criminal evidence against Trump that even Mueller did not have and after attempting to present a personally-authored fictional account of the phone call between the Ukraine PM and President Trump as 'evidence' (one he and the MSM quickly called a 'parody' after he was almost immediately called out for this LIE), people don't know if there is a 'Non-whistleblower' or not, if it is another lie / false claim by Schiff of having one to give hollow justification for continuing this coup, or if this 'whistleblower' is some non-existent individual in another one of Schiff's fictitious 'parodies'... UNTIL a 'whistleblower is actually, officially named, is confirmed, and they come forward, THERE IS NO 'WHISTLEBLOWER'.
FACT:
There are no witnesses. EVERY individual Schiff has called to testify has declared they have HEARSAY to share or that it was HEARSAY that helped them to formulate their opinions and presumptions.
FACT:
The ONLY real crimes - once again - the Democrats have managed to expose as a result of another butt-hurt, zero-substance Impeachment coup attempt are their own, starting with Joe and Hunter Biden and ending with D-Adam Schiff's own.
.
here is no 'witness'
- There is no 'whistleblower'
- There is no 'original source' of the HEARSAY
GOP presses empty Ukraine meddling theory
There is no evidence Hunter Biden did anything wrong, said Yuri Lutsenko, the prosecutor general who succeeded Shokin.
According to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe, Biden forced firing of Shokin because he wasn't pursuing corruption. Burisma was only under investigation before Hunter joined as a corporate lawyer.
Nobody is claiming the ukraine whistleblower didnt follow rules, that I can find.
Since the transcript of the ukraine call matches the whistleblower complaint, its not hearsay.
Two staffers destroy hearsay defense, David Holmes and Suriya Jayanti.
More testimony currently on-going will further destroy hearsay argument.
Impeachment is the mechanism that the Framers provided in the Constitution to address “the abuse or violation of some public trust,” as Alexander Hamilton put it in “Federalist No. 65.” Other countries might suffer unfit leaders without recourse, or oust them using extralegal violence, but not the United States. The coequal branch of Congress would check the presidency. The House would be lawfully empowered to impeach, and the Senate to conduct a trial. If two-thirds of senators voted to convict, the president would be removed.
"Shortly before Yovanovitch was set to take the stand, Fox News contributor John Solomon published an explosive March interview with Yuriy Lutsenko, a former prosecutor general in Ukraine. Lutsenko claimed that Yovanovitch had given him a “do not prosecute” list — and Solomon reported that Yovanovitch pressured Ukrainian prosecutors to back off a case involving the AntiCorruption Action Centre, funded by Soros, the liberal megadonor.
The U.S. Embassy under Yovanovitch, Solomon reported, also influenced Ukraine to drop prosecution against top law enforcement official Artem Sytnyk, who was singled out by a Ukrainian court for leaking damaging information about Paul Manafort, then Trump's campaign chairman, to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. Ukraine courts have ruled that the Manafort financial disclosures constituted illegal election meddling."
Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings
U.S. Embassy vehemently denies Lutsenko’s absurd claim. Lutsenko’s unfounded allegation is clear retribution for the ambassador’s speech condemning the incumbent government for doing so little to fight corruption.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs George P. Kent, under questioning, said there was “no factual basis” to any theory of Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 election — while there is ample evidence of Russian interference.
Debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory is knocked down - again
OF COURSE Lutsenko denies it.....there is more evidence to prove this to be so than Schiff has from any of his MISSING 'whistleblowers' and NON-EXISTENT 'witnesses'.