Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Without the stock market, publicly held corporations would not be practical since there would be no market for the shares of ownership. In essence business would have to be owned by the government, single proprietors, partnerships, or private corporations. None of these options would be workable in our economy.No, it is not the taxes. That is why I propose a separation between corporations and state that Liberals want, and while corporations will pay no taxes, they will reap no benefits from government, and own no lands. Let them stand on their own, or fall. This will eliminate most of the legislation of congress and the laws of the IRS, and significantly shrink the size of government and pentagon costs.
Further we can eliminate the Stock Market that deprives American workers of a living wage and benefits for their families, while adding nothing to the economy.
Liberals are up to their eyeballs in crony/corporate love sharing too, shintao. Corporate welfare is blind also when it comes to party lines.
They could. All it would take is a balance budget amendment.To cut a deficit, there are only two options. Cut spending or increase revenue. If Congress could cut spending without wrecking the economy, then that would be a preferable solution. However, when Congress cannot cut spending the only alternative it to increase taxes.European nations already have all the new and higher taxes American socialists want, and they have no military on par with the US, and they are still insolvent.
It's not the taxes.
The income tax has never been lower. Nearly half the country pays nothing due tax credits, deductions, and low rates. The sensible political solution would be a package of tax increases accompanied by spending cuts.
Tax increases never keep pace with spending.
Corporations can move anywhere in the world they want. Working class stiffs can't.
No, it is not the taxes. That is why I propose a separation between corporations and state that Liberals want, and while corporations will pay no taxes, they will reap no benefits from government, and own no lands. Let them stand on their own, or fall. This will eliminate most of the legislation of congress and the laws of the IRS, and significantly shrink the size of government and pentagon costs.
Further we can eliminate the Stock Market that deprives American workers of a living wage and benefits for their families, while adding nothing to the economy.
Without the stock market, publicly held corporations would not be practical since there would be no market for the shares of ownership. In essence business would have to be owned by the government, single proprietors, partnerships, or private corporations. None of these options would be workable in our economy.
What a fucking sob story
Guess what dumbass, I'm working poor and I don't pay a god damn dime in taxes.
As a matter of fact I MADE $230 dollars profit last year in by doing my taxes.
I, me, are not paying our fair share to live in the country.
If that whiney bitch wants to help, tell that asshole to pay his people more or hire more people to do whatever he can think of.
you didn't contribute 7.65% of every dollar in wages to the government?
Isn't that the "Social Security Trust Fund?"
Or is the mask off on that fraud now, too?
How is that working out so far, I mean smalll businesses starting up and compensating for the bottom dropping out of employment?
The bottom 50% of earners pay no Federal income taxes. Of course, they want someone else to pay more taxes.
Wall Street and the banks are back in business, thanks to Obama.
Speaking of corporate welfare, GM, Chrysler, banks and Wall Street were all bailed out. Talk about government/corporate collusion. Hell, I was against that from day 1 yet government pumped in billions to corporations when they should have failed or figured out a way to survive without government wic stamps.
Speaking of corporate welfare, GM, Chrysler, banks and Wall Street were all bailed out. Talk about government/corporate collusion. Hell, I was against that from day 1 yet government pumped in billions to corporations when they should have failed or figured out a way to survive without government wic stamps.
I agree, the more small business, the better. The problem that a small business runs into as it grows is that it can not raise enough capital by borrowing from the bank. Then there is a need for new investors which leads to a publicly owned business which means you need a market for the shares of ownership.No, it is not the taxes. That is why I propose a separation between corporations and state that Liberals want, and while corporations will pay no taxes, they will reap no benefits from government, and own no lands. Let them stand on their own, or fall. This will eliminate most of the legislation of congress and the laws of the IRS, and significantly shrink the size of government and pentagon costs.
Further we can eliminate the Stock Market that deprives American workers of a living wage and benefits for their families, while adding nothing to the economy.
Without the stock market, publicly held corporations would not be practical since there would be no market for the shares of ownership. In essence business would have to be owned by the government, single proprietors, partnerships, or private corporations. None of these options would be workable in our economy.
I see no problem with that, and more of a problem with billions out of circulation, trillions given away and banks folding or being bailed out, where the loans should come from after being scrutinized by Bankers for credit worthiness. Single proprietors are the Libertarian way of individualism America was built on, correct? Cons love it! Government not be involved, as I just said separation of corporate & state. A business makes it on it's own with good fiscal responsibility watched by lender banks, or it fails, it is not my problem. The more small businesses created, the more workers that are needed.
I agree, the more small business, the better. The problem that a small business runs into as it grows is that it can not raise enough capital by borrowing from the bank. Then there is a need for new investors which leads to a publicly owned business which means you need a market for the shares of ownership.Without the stock market, publicly held corporations would not be practical since there would be no market for the shares of ownership. In essence business would have to be owned by the government, single proprietors, partnerships, or private corporations. None of these options would be workable in our economy.
I see no problem with that, and more of a problem with billions out of circulation, trillions given away and banks folding or being bailed out, where the loans should come from after being scrutinized by Bankers for credit worthiness. Single proprietors are the Libertarian way of individualism America was built on, correct? Cons love it! Government not be involved, as I just said separation of corporate & state. A business makes it on it's own with good fiscal responsibility watched by lender banks, or it fails, it is not my problem. The more small businesses created, the more workers that are needed.
Never read shit from the HuffPuff, it rots what little brain you have.
Obama added $3T in new debt, and now he wants Repubilcans to pay for it with higher taxes.
