Blagger
Rookie
- Banned
- #1
Now, as you're all notoriously aware, Great Britain triggered the loss of the Thirteen Colonies by pursuing a bizarre policy of denying its humble crown subjects representation in Parliament, leading to mass revolt that ended with British defeat at the hands of treach... er, sorry, mistreated colonists.
But what if, when asked, Parliament granted autonomy to the Thirteen Colonies and allowed it to appoint a member of Parliament to protect and represent its interests, in return for submitting to imperial law, being subjects of the crown and paying a tax to its mother country?
And in doing so, would the Thirteen Colonies have remained in the gri...er, sorry, warm embrace of the British Empire. And if so, how long?
But what if, when asked, Parliament granted autonomy to the Thirteen Colonies and allowed it to appoint a member of Parliament to protect and represent its interests, in return for submitting to imperial law, being subjects of the crown and paying a tax to its mother country?
And in doing so, would the Thirteen Colonies have remained in the gri...er, sorry, warm embrace of the British Empire. And if so, how long?