Talking to the Taliban now?

Discussion in 'Afghanistan' started by Gurdari, Oct 29, 2008.

  1. Gurdari
    Offline

    Gurdari Egaliterra

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,019
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the West
    Ratings:
    +40
    Seems like the direction is now toward diplomacy.

    What kind of message does that send?

    NATO will attack until you fight back really hard... then we'll use diplomacy?

    What sort of savages would do things like that, clearly in reverse order to common sense?
     
  2. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    We have a much better bargaining position now.
     
  3. Gurdari
    Offline

    Gurdari Egaliterra

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,019
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the West
    Ratings:
    +40
    How so? After we deposed them, bombed the country and spent a lot of money we are in a weaker position. What can we threaten or offer besides a quick exit, now?
     
  4. Sunni Man
    Offline

    Sunni Man Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,001
    Thanks Received:
    5,328
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    Patriotic American Muslim
    Ratings:
    +12,444
    Make no mistake about it. The warlords run Afghanistain.

    Most warlords are symphathetic to the Taliban.

    Because when the U.S. and NATO leave the country.

    The Taliban will still be there.
     
  5. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Well---there's always wiping out the poppies.
     
  6. Gurdari
    Offline

    Gurdari Egaliterra

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,019
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the West
    Ratings:
    +40
    Ha! But the Taliban did that before, and I assume if they were to rule again the poppies would be gone again.

    Even if we threatened destruction of their farmland, which I think is a war crime - we really have no cards to play.
     
  7. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    no worries--everything is going to change.
     
  8. Gurdari
    Offline

    Gurdari Egaliterra

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,019
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the West
    Ratings:
    +40

    No matter who gets elected there won't be much diplomacy it seems... then again, there is very little money in peacemaking.
     
  9. Gurdari
    Offline

    Gurdari Egaliterra

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,019
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the West
    Ratings:
    +40
    So, another NATO airstrike and another bunch of dead innocent people.
    We are creating ideal conditions for violent retribution. Which seems counter to any 'war on terrorism'. If in fact such a thing exists.
     
  10. José
    Online

    José Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,243
    Thanks Received:
    314
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Ratings:
    +360
    Gurdari

    This is a personal question so I want you to feel absolutely free to ignore it.

    Are you an Indian immigrant living in North America?
     

Share This Page