"Take her out" re: Voyanovitch

[Paulie]

and the only reason trump n giuliani wanted to take her out, fire her, is because the Ukraine prosecutor LUTSENKO from the previous admin before Velensky in the Ukraine, worked a QUID PRO QUO with Giuliani, that if giuliani got Trump to fire our us ambassador who was tasked with ending the corruption in the Ukraine, who was on to Lutsenko's corruption, FIRED, he would THEN run an investigation in to Burisma/Bidens for Giuliani/the president.

 

[fncceo]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

What about Hamlet's words to Rosencranz and Gilderstern?

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

What I am trying to figure out is why Parnas and associates wanted Yovanovitch removed from office so badly?
They were working on this for more than a year- and I don't think it was just to prep the ground for Trump's attempt to interfere in our election.
I suspect that there was some kind of very shady deal that Yovanovitch was standing in the way of.

 

[Paulie]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

What I am trying to figure out is why Parnas and associates wanted Yovanovitch removed from office so badly?
They were working on this for more than a year- and I don't think it was just to prep the ground for Trump's attempt to interfere in our election.
I suspect that there was some kind of very shady deal that Yovanovitch was standing in the way of.

I can’t even begin to imagine how hard it must be to remain this stupid

 

[Yarddog]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

AND???? whats the problem? supposedly she was badmouthing Trump and she worked for him. It's not her who sets foreign policy.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

What I am trying to figure out is why Parnas and associates wanted Yovanovitch removed from office so badly?
They were working on this for more than a year- and I don't think it was just to prep the ground for Trump's attempt to interfere in our election.
I suspect that there was some kind of very shady deal that Yovanovitch was standing in the way of.

I can’t even begin to imagine how hard it must be to remain this stupid

Me either- how hard is it for Trump to be so stupid as to solicit a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival?

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

AND???? whats the problem? supposedly she was badmouthing Trump and she worked for him. It's not her who sets foreign policy.

"supposedly"

First of all- she worked for the American people- Trump is not a king. Trump has the discression to fire any ambassador for any reason he wants- but they owe him no personal loyalty.

Secondly there is absolutely no evidence that she ever 'badmouthed' Trump.

But there is consistent testimony that she was actively fighting corruption in the Ukraine.

Which makes me wonder if she was standing in the way of some particular corruption that Trump's buddies wanted to ensure.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

i saw the hag on tv telling lies a few weeks ago so shes still alive and get this....still employed by the fed government .

'hag'

Another true blue misogynist for Trump.

Why wouldn't she still be employed by the Federal government? What exactly has she done wrong?

 

[yidnar]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

i saw the hag on tv telling lies a few weeks ago so shes still alive and get this....still employed by the fed government .

'hag'

Another true blue misogynist for Trump.

Why wouldn't she still be employed by the Federal government? What exactly has she done wrong?

well i gues Trump isnt out to get rid of her, him, or it.... or whatever the biased holdover identifies itself as ...

 

[Care4all]

and the only reason trump n giuliani wanted to take her out, fire her, is because the Ukraine prosecutor LUTSENKO from the previous admin before Velensky in the Ukraine, worked a QUID PRO QUO with Giuliani, that if giuliani got Trump to fire our us ambassador who was tasked with ending the corruption in the Ukraine, who was on to Lutsenko's corruption, FIRED, he would THEN run an investigation in to Burisma/Bidens for Giuliani/the president.

have you not read the Parnas emails and documents released last week, or seen the Parnas interviews last week?

I can't help it if you guys choose to live in this bubble of protection, from information and news?

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

i saw the hag on tv telling lies a few weeks ago so shes still alive and get this....still employed by the fed government .

'hag'

Another true blue misogynist for Trump.

Why wouldn't she still be employed by the Federal government? What exactly has she done wrong?

well i gues Trump isnt out to get rid of her, him, or it.... or whatever the biased holdover identifies itself as ...

Trump has the right to remove any ambassador- however Yovanovitch is a career State Department employee- he doesn't have the right to fire any State Department employee he wants to without cause.

Would he if he could?

Considering that Trump is a thin skinned bully who always believes in attacking those who he feels threatened by- in a New York minute.

 

[Paulie]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

What I am trying to figure out is why Parnas and associates wanted Yovanovitch removed from office so badly?
They were working on this for more than a year- and I don't think it was just to prep the ground for Trump's attempt to interfere in our election.
I suspect that there was some kind of very shady deal that Yovanovitch was standing in the way of.

I can’t even begin to imagine how hard it must be to remain this stupid

Me either- how hard is it for Trump to be so stupid as to solicit a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival?

You are a programmed robot. Turn your TV off and get outside. You’ve lost your mind.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

What I am trying to figure out is why Parnas and associates wanted Yovanovitch removed from office so badly?
They were working on this for more than a year- and I don't think it was just to prep the ground for Trump's attempt to interfere in our election.
I suspect that there was some kind of very shady deal that Yovanovitch was standing in the way of.

I can’t even begin to imagine how hard it must be to remain this stupid

Me either- how hard is it for Trump to be so stupid as to solicit a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival?

You are a programmed robot. Turn your TV off and get outside. You’ve lost your mind.

Clearly you are projecting your own issues on others.

 

[Zorro!]

Trump knew that Yovanovitch would be an obstacle to his abuse of power by unlawfully withholding military aid to Ukraine.

Trump is more a mob boss than a president.

It wasn't a crime to hold up aid. Congress set no deadline for it's release, and Trump released it before the Fiscal year ended.

A president can fire an ambassador for any reason or no reason. If the ambassador is bad mouthing the president, that’s an excellent reason.

To be sure, a wise president will want to confirm reports of the bad mouthing before he acts. In this case, Trump didn’t act at the time he first heard such a report. Yovanovitch was removed more than a year later.

Since the tape recording, as reported, does not remotely show improper conduct by Trump, some critics are spinning it in a different direction. Trump has said of Parnas “I don’t know him.” Yet, reportedly they were at the same dinner, and interacted there.

I’ve interacted with public figures at fairly small dinners. If they don’t remember me, and I’m sure most of them don’t, I’m not offended. If they say they don’t “know” me, I’m not going to say they are lying.

I don’t know if Trump is lying about whether he knows Parnas. Maybe it comes down to what the meaning of “know him” is in this context. Certainly Trump didn't "know him" in the biblical sense.

The drive to impeach President Trump is about to fail. It doesn’t seem to have turned public opinion against the president. Hence the continuing need for stories like the one arising from the April 2018 recording.

A meaningless tape recording of Trump

 

[Care4all]

Trump knew that Yovanovitch would be an obstacle to his abuse of power by unlawfully withholding military aid to Ukraine.

Trump is more a mob boss than a president.

It wasn't a crime to hold up aid. Congress set no deadline for it's release, and Trump released it before the Fiscal year ended.

A president can fire an ambassador for any reason or no reason. If the ambassador is bad mouthing the president, that’s an excellent reason.

To be sure, a wise president will want to confirm reports of the bad mouthing before he acts. In this case, Trump didn’t act at the time he first heard such a report. Yovanovitch was removed more than a year later.

Since the tape recording, as reported, does not remotely show improper conduct by Trump, some critics are spinning it in a different direction. Trump has said of Parnas “I don’t know him.” Yet, reportedly they were at the same dinner, and interacted there.

I’ve interacted with public figures at fairly small dinners. If they don’t remember me, and I’m sure most of them don’t, I’m not offended. If they say they don’t “know” me, I’m not going to say they are lying.

I don’t know if Trump is lying about whether he knows Parnas. Maybe it comes down to what the meaning of “know him” is in this context. Certainly Trump didn't "know him" in the biblical sense.

The drive to impeach President Trump is about to fail. It doesn’t seem to have turned public opinion against the president. Hence the continuing need for stories like the one arising from the April 2018 recording.

A meaningless tape recording of Trump

He tried to fire her 5 times, at least, said Parnas, in front of him or Rudy..... but Pompeo would not do it.... there is more to this story.... we need to talk to Pompeo.

So, the Trump mobsters began bad mouthing and lying about her on Trump TV, FOX. Victoria and Joe DiGenova, Rudy, John Solomon, and Don Junior, and Parnassus paid Texas Rep Pete Sessions to bad mouth her too, hoping to shame trump in to forcing pompeo to do it or get yavonvich to quit.

His mobsters, Rudy and goons needed her gone, so prosecutor Lutsenko would do Rudy the favor of announcing the opening of an investigation in to Burisma/Bidens.....

Lutsenko wanted her gone because he was corrupt and she was fight ting corruption there, as a USA diplomatic goal.


So much for president Trump`s LIE about not knowing Lev Parnas....

 

[Care4all]

Don't forget his ice cream on his pie, ......

1.Ambassador Yovanovitch, at any time while you served in Ukraine did any officials in Kiev ever express concern to you that President Trump might be withholding foreign aid assistance to get political investigations started? Did President Trump ever ask you as America’s top representative in Kiev to pressure Ukrainians to start an investigation about Burisma Holdings or the Bidens?
2.What was the Ukrainians’ perception of President Trump after he allowed lethal aid to go to Ukraine in 2018?
3. In the spring and summer of 2019, did you ever become aware of any U.S. intelligence or U.S. treasury concerns raised about incoming Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his affiliation or proximity to certain oligarchs? Did any of those concerns involve what the IMF might do if a certain oligarch who supported Zelensky returned to power and regained influence over Ukraine’s national bank?
4.Back in May 2018, then-House Rules Committee chairman Pete Sessions wrote a letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo suggesting you might have made comments unflattering or unsupportive of the president and should be recalled. Setting aside that Sessions is a Republican and might even have donors interested in Ukraine policy, were you ever questioned about his concerns? At any time have you or your embassy staff made comments that could be viewed as unsupportive or critical of President Trump and his policies?
5.John Solomon reported at The Hill and your colleagues have since confirmed in testimony that the State Department helped fund a nonprofit called the Anti-Corruption Action Centre of Ukraine that also was funded by George Soros’ main charity. That nonprofit, also known as AnTac, was identified in a 2014 Soros foundation strategy document as critical to reshaping Ukraine to Mr. Soros’ vision. Can you explain what role your embassy played in funding this group and why State funds would flow to it? And did any one consider the perception of mingling tax dollars with those donated by Soros, a liberal ideologue who spent millions in 2016 trying to elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump?
6.In March 2019, Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuriy Lutsenko gave an on-the-record, videotaped interview to The Hill alleging that during a 2016 meeting you discussed a list of names of Ukrainian nationals and groups you did not want to see Ukrainian prosecutors target. Your supporters have since suggested he recanted that story. Did you or your staff ever do anything to confirm he had recanted or changed his story, such as talk to him, or did you just rely on press reports?
7.Now that both the New York Times and The Hill have confirmed that Lutsenko stands by his account and has not recanted, how do you respond to his concerns? And setting aide the use of the word “list,” is it possible that during that 2016 meeting with Mr. Lutsenko you discussed the names of certain Ukrainians you did not want to see prosecuted, investigated or harassed?
8.Your colleagues, in particular Mr. George Kent, have confirmed to the House Intelligence Committee that the U.S. embassy in Kiev did, in fact, exert pressure on the Ukrainian prosecutors office not to prosecute certain Ukrainian activists and officials. These efforts included a letter Mr. Kent signed urging Ukrainian prosecutors to back off an investigation of the aforementioned group AnTac as well as engaged in conversations about certain Ukrainians like Parliamentary member Sergey Leschenko, journalist Vitali Shabunin and NABU director Artem Sytnyk. Why was the US. Embassy involved in exerting such pressure and did any of these actions run afoul of the Geneva Convention’s requirement that foreign diplomats avoid becoming involved in the internal affairs of their host country?
9.On March 5 of this year, you gave a speech in which you called for the replacement of Ukraine’s top anti-corruption prosecutor. That speech occurred in the middle of the Ukrainian presidential election and obviously raised concerns among some Ukrainians of internal interference prohibited by the Geneva Convention. In fact, one of your bosses, Under Secretary David Hale, got questioned about those concerns when he arrived in country a few days later. Why did you think it was appropriate to give advice to Ukrainians on an internal personnel matter and did you consider then or now the potential concerns your comments might raise about meddling in the Ukrainian election or the country’s internal affairs?
10.If the Ukrainian ambassador to the United States suddenly urged us to fire Attorney General Bill Bar or our FBI director, would you think that was appropriate?
11.At any time since December 2015, did you or your embassy ever have any contact with Vice President Joe Biden, his office or his son Hunter Biden concerning Burisma Holdings or an investigation into its owner Mykola Zlochevsky?
12.At any time since you were appointed ambassador to Ukraine, did you or your embassy have any contact with the following Burisma figures: Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, lawyer John Buretta, Blue Star strategies representatives Sally Painter and Karen Tramontano, or former Ukrainian embassy official Andrii Telizhenko?
13.John Solomon obtained documents showing Burisma representatives were pressuring the State Department in February 2016 to help end the corruption allegations against the company and were invoking Hunter Biden’s name as part of their effort. Did you ever subsequently learn of these contacts and did any one at State — including but not limited to Secretary Kerry, Undersecretary Novelli, Deputy Secretary Blinken or Assistant Secretary Nuland — ever raise Burisma with you?
14.What was your embassy’s assessment of the corruption allegations around Burisma and why the company may have hired Hunter Biden as a board member in 2014?
15.In spring 2019 your embassy reportedly began monitoring briefly the social media communications of certain people viewed as supportive of President Trump and gathering analytics about them. Who were those people? Why was this done? Why did it stop? And did anyone in the State Department chain of command ever suggest targeting Americans with State resources might be improper or illegal?

You stupid PUTINista propagandist!

REP. Pete SESSIONS WAS PAID BY PARNAS TO WRITE THE NEGATIVE LETTER about Yavanovich.

 

[Care4all]

and the only reason trump n giuliani wanted to take her out, fire her, is because the Ukraine prosecutor LUTSENKO from the previous admin before Velensky in the Ukraine, worked a QUID PRO QUO with Giuliani, that if giuliani got Trump to fire our us ambassador who was tasked with ending the corruption in the Ukraine, who was on to Lutsenko's corruption, FIRED, he would THEN run an investigation in to Burisma/Bidens for Giuliani/the president.

YEP!

That's what Parnas said in one of his interviews.

 

[2aguy]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

Moron.....

He fired her a year later.........sorry you wasted the time to start this thread.

 

[yidnar]

Trump's words. Recorded at dinner with Parnas and Fruman.

Considering Trump has the sole power to fire her, and considering these two men were not members of our government...

....what could he have meant?

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump talking about firing ambassador

i saw the hag on tv telling lies a few weeks ago so shes still alive and get this....still employed by the fed government .

'hag'

Another true blue misogynist for Trump.

Why wouldn't she still be employed by the Federal government? What exactly has she done wrong?

well i gues Trump isnt out to get rid of her, him, or it.... or whatever the biased holdover identifies itself as ...

Trump has the right to remove any ambassador- however Yovanovitch is a career State Department employee- he doesn't have the right to fire any State Department employee he wants to without cause.

Would he if he could?

Considering that Trump is a thin skinned bully who always believes in attacking those who he feels threatened by- in a New York minute.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/12/obama-gives-political-ambassad.html

 

[Zorro!]

Trump knew that Yovanovitch would be an obstacle to his abuse of power by unlawfully withholding military aid to Ukraine.

Trump is more a mob boss than a president.

It wasn't a crime to hold up aid. Congress set no deadline for it's release, and Trump released it before the Fiscal year ended.

A president can fire an ambassador for any reason or no reason. If the ambassador is bad mouthing the president, that’s an excellent reason.

To be sure, a wise president will want to confirm reports of the bad mouthing before he acts. In this case, Trump didn’t act at the time he first heard such a report. Yovanovitch was removed more than a year later.

Since the tape recording, as reported, does not remotely show improper conduct by Trump, some critics are spinning it in a different direction. Trump has said of Parnas “I don’t know him.” Yet, reportedly they were at the same dinner, and interacted there.

I’ve interacted with public figures at fairly small dinners. If they don’t remember me, and I’m sure most of them don’t, I’m not offended. If they say they don’t “know” me, I’m not going to say they are lying.

I don’t know if Trump is lying about whether he knows Parnas. Maybe it comes down to what the meaning of “know him” is in this context. Certainly Trump didn't "know him" in the biblical sense.

The drive to impeach President Trump is about to fail. It doesn’t seem to have turned public opinion against the president. Hence the continuing need for stories like the one arising from the April 2018 recording.

A meaningless tape recording of Trump

He tried to fire her 5 times, at least, said Parnas,

So what? He has every right to fire an ambassador, they serve at the pleasure of The President.

... So, the Trump mobsters...

Buzzword Salad that conveys no meaningful information.

... His mobsters, Rudy and goons...

That's all you have? Name calling?