Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?It is good for the west to have proxy forces for covert and false flag operations. Now, that the Nato creates hot spots they think Russia will not allow to be attacked, a proxy force must be created that can pulverize them without changing the political climate. A new group must be formed. Jaysh al-Bashar will be its name, radical secularism their religion. They will use remote car bombs, roadside bombs and self-propelled barrel bombs.
For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?It is good for the west to have proxy forces for covert and false flag operations. Now, that the Nato creates hot spots they think Russia will not allow to be attacked, a proxy force must be created that can pulverize them without changing the political climate. A new group must be formed. Jaysh al-Bashar will be its name, radical secularism their religion. They will use remote car bombs, roadside bombs and self-propelled barrel bombs.
And what those radical proxy forces could do in this case?For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?It is good for the west to have proxy forces for covert and false flag operations. Now, that the Nato creates hot spots they think Russia will not allow to be attacked, a proxy force must be created that can pulverize them without changing the political climate. A new group must be formed. Jaysh al-Bashar will be its name, radical secularism their religion. They will use remote car bombs, roadside bombs and self-propelled barrel bombs.
Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia
For example, Norwegian special forces are embedded in the "rebel" forces in the al-Tanf border crossing. The radical proxy forces could attack them and the West would have to swallow that it is just a competing rebel group, that is responsible.And what those radical proxy forces could do in this case?For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?It is good for the west to have proxy forces for covert and false flag operations. Now, that the Nato creates hot spots they think Russia will not allow to be attacked, a proxy force must be created that can pulverize them without changing the political climate. A new group must be formed. Jaysh al-Bashar will be its name, radical secularism their religion. They will use remote car bombs, roadside bombs and self-propelled barrel bombs.
Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia
It is hardly possible. Everyone in the Coalition would know that it was virtually Assad’s forces. I am sure there is an agreement between Russia and the US according to which Russia (and Assad) must avoid any possible damage to Coalition’s forces.For example, Norwegian special forces are embedded in the "rebel" forces in the al-Tanf border crossing. The radical proxy forces could attack them and the West would have to swallow that it is just a competing rebel group, that is responsible.And what those radical proxy forces could do in this case?For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?It is good for the west to have proxy forces for covert and false flag operations. Now, that the Nato creates hot spots they think Russia will not allow to be attacked, a proxy force must be created that can pulverize them without changing the political climate. A new group must be formed. Jaysh al-Bashar will be its name, radical secularism their religion. They will use remote car bombs, roadside bombs and self-propelled barrel bombs.
Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia
If Russia truly supports Syria´s unity as claimed and the Nato continues to deploy forces, a confrontation will take place.It is hardly possible. Everyone in the Coalition would know that it was virtually Assad’s forces. I am sure there is an agreement between Russia and the US according to which Russia (and Assad) must avoid any possible damage to Coalition’s forces.For example, Norwegian special forces are embedded in the "rebel" forces in the al-Tanf border crossing. The radical proxy forces could attack them and the West would have to swallow that it is just a competing rebel group, that is responsible.And what those radical proxy forces could do in this case?For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?It is good for the west to have proxy forces for covert and false flag operations. Now, that the Nato creates hot spots they think Russia will not allow to be attacked, a proxy force must be created that can pulverize them without changing the political climate. A new group must be formed. Jaysh al-Bashar will be its name, radical secularism their religion. They will use remote car bombs, roadside bombs and self-propelled barrel bombs.
Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia
I think that direct confrontation won’t take place. No one is interested in it. Syria de facto will remain a united country.If Russia truly supports Syria´s unity as claimed and the Nato continues to deploy forces, a confrontation will take place.It is hardly possible. Everyone in the Coalition would know that it was virtually Assad’s forces. I am sure there is an agreement between Russia and the US according to which Russia (and Assad) must avoid any possible damage to Coalition’s forces.For example, Norwegian special forces are embedded in the "rebel" forces in the al-Tanf border crossing. The radical proxy forces could attack them and the West would have to swallow that it is just a competing rebel group, that is responsible.And what those radical proxy forces could do in this case?For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.What exactly these covert and false flag operations should be?
Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia
I think those Norwegians are posing and will withdraw in case of an attack. Anyway, Russian troops are embedded in the Syrian forces. And they have a lot of Iraqi fighters there on both sides of the border, too...I think that direct confrontation won’t take place. No one is interested in it. Syria de facto will remain a united country.If Russia truly supports Syria´s unity as claimed and the Nato continues to deploy forces, a confrontation will take place.It is hardly possible. Everyone in the Coalition would know that it was virtually Assad’s forces. I am sure there is an agreement between Russia and the US according to which Russia (and Assad) must avoid any possible damage to Coalition’s forces.For example, Norwegian special forces are embedded in the "rebel" forces in the al-Tanf border crossing. The radical proxy forces could attack them and the West would have to swallow that it is just a competing rebel group, that is responsible.And what those radical proxy forces could do in this case?For example when FSA, al-Qaeda and ISIS jointly occupied Raqqa.
Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia
That was Irosie al-Saud somewhere in Riyadh. This is KSA1.for those who do not know----for all practical purposes SHIITE MEANS IRAN. Iran is Shiite HOLY LAND In fact----for Shiites the language FARSI is more "holy" than is Arabic. I have known
many NON-IRANIAN SHIITES------in their madrassas-----they study
FARSI ------not Arabic. Shiite is a dangerous cult in its own 'right' ------the good news is THEY HATE ARABS
