Syria To Be Bombed Within Days

[Vikrant]

I pay almost 5K/month in taxes. People in the U.S. are overtaxed. If nothing is done about it, the country will crumble. The money does not come from Sky. It is very foolish thing to do to waste money on wars that have no tangible benefits.

I hope people in the U.S. would wise up and take a back seat on this war. Let other NATO members pick the slack. Let them realize how easy it is to finance a war.

There are plenty of countries that have far more dangerous chemical weapons than Syria's alleged stockpile. Is the U.S. going to war against all those countries?

 

[skye]

This is what I have been waiting for with this situation. NATO, not just a few members should get involved in this situation.

"Barack Obama is unlikely to have much trouble mustering a Nato coalition of the willing if Washington opts for military intervention in Syria in response to the alleged chemical weapons atrocities by the Assad regime...

Turkey, which accounts for Nato's second largest army after the US, and which is on the frontline with Syria, bearing the brunt of the massive refugee crisis, is already a key conduit for arms supplies to, and a safe haven for, the sundry groups of fighters at war with Damascus.

It has been the loudest critic of the Assad regime, clamouring for the west to do more. In any international coalition Turkey would be likely to play a key role – with a potential impact on the country's own ethnic balance, especially the relations between the Sunni Muslim majority and the sizeable Alevi minority concentrated in the south near the Syrian border.

Britain and France, the EU's only military powers with the capacity and will to project military muscle abroad, look certain to line up with the US."


Nato members could act against Syria without UN mandate | World news | The Guardian

Absolutely!

They certainly can act without UN mandate ... and they will act .... the whole world can see the shocking reality of what has happened in Syria.... and these crimes against innocent children and civilians have to be stopped!

Evil Regimes can not have chemical or nuclear weapons in their hands, being Syria or Iran etc.... its too dangerous for the whole world!

 

[dilloduck]

^ What kind of chemical weapons do they have?

it's a scam. We don't give a shit what they have and NATO will kill civilians as they lynch Assad.

 

[skye]

^ What kind of chemical weapons do they have?

it's a scam. We don't give a shit what they have and NATO will kill civilians as they lynch Assad.

Civilians and innocent children don't deserve to be killed with chemical weapons.....

So yes... lynch whoever you have to lynch.... no chemical weapons to kill children! is that too hard to understand??????

 

[Gracie]

Children are dying right here in the good ol USA...many from starvation.

Sorry, and it may seem really heartless...but we need to focus on the USA now and not other countries probs.

 

[skye]

Children are dying right here in the good ol USA...many from starvation.

Sorry, and it may seem really heartless...but we need to focus on the USA now and not other countries probs.

No?


well I do care if chemical weapons are used in Syrian innocent children.

I am stupid that way.

 

[Gracie]

Who said you were stupid?
We will just have to agree to disagree on this. Children in Rwanda are being killed too. And India. And all over the world. We cannot keep policing earth.

 

[skye]

Who said you were stupid?
We will just have to agree to disagree on this. Children in Rwanda are being killed too. And India. And all over the world. We cannot keep policing earth.

YES we can.

and YES


we will agree to disagree.

 

[Gracie]

ok

 

[skye]

ok then.

 

[Moonglow]

^ What kind of chemical weapons do they have?

according to docs in the area, neurotoxins, better have your atropine injectors nearby.

 

[Moonglow]

"... indirectly assisting Al Qaeda."

indirectly?

We are working hand in hand with them.

proof?

 

[skye]

"... indirectly assisting Al Qaeda."

indirectly?

We are working hand in hand with them.

proof?

you will have proof in the bombing next week.

#$%%^

 

[skye]

"... indirectly assisting Al Qaeda."

indirectly?

We are working hand in hand with them.

proof?

here is your proof ...no child should die like that..... none!

 

[MJB12741]

What Syria has done to their own children is hard to forgive.

 

[skye]

What Syria has done to their own children is hard to forgive.

It is.

 

[Connery]

There is clear justification for NATO acting in this instance and for the US in particular to get involved. There is precedent and justification in this situation.


"In the case of Syria... the administration could argue that the use of chemical weapons had created a grave humanitarian emergency and that without a forceful response there would be a danger that the Assad government might use it on a large scale once again. Another basis for intervening in Syria, Mr. Daalder said, might be violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which outlaws the use in war of poison gas. Dennis B. Ross, a former adviser to Mr. Obama on the Middle East, said that if the president wanted to develop a legal justification for acting, “there are lots of ways to do it outside the U.N. context.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/w...yria-chemical-attack.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

[Connery]

I pay almost 5K/month in taxes. People in the U.S. are overtaxed. If nothing is done about it, the country will crumble. The money does not come from Sky. It is very foolish thing to do to waste money on wars that have no tangible benefits.

I hope people in the U.S. would wise up and take a back seat on this war. Let other NATO members pick the slack. Let them realize how easy it is to finance a war.

There are plenty of countries that have far more dangerous chemical weapons than Syria's alleged stockpile. Is the U.S. going to war against all those countries?

One tangible benefit is to foster some type of balance of power and stability in the area, another is to maintain a strong presence in the region. The US has a responsibility to both the Turkey as an ally and a member of NATO to be act should it be necessary and protect all friendly interests as it ultimately benefits the US in many ways not only those that are at the tip of our nose.

 

[Connery]

Children are dying right here in the good ol USA...many from starvation.

Sorry, and it may seem really heartless...but we need to focus on the USA now and not other countries probs.

Yes we do as the US is a global leader and there are measures taken in the US currently for our domestic problems. Further, Domestic US issues have nothing to do with the situation in Syria.

 

[Gracie]

What happens if boots wind up on the ground? Another Iraq and more troops killed?