Switzerland will not extradite Roman Polanski

[Moon]

Did you do drugs in your teens, In her teenage years(the 70s) drugs and sex were everywhere.

It was a crime in the 70's and it remains one to this day. So the fact that drugs were supposedly "everywhere" is totally irrelevant. Giving drugs to a child was criminal. Having sexual intercourse or oral sex with a child was criminal. Forcing sex upon anybody regardless of age was criminal.

In short, you do a lot of babbling but you have managed to say nothing intelligent or intelligible on this topic.

Let's simplify this for you.

WHEN (in the 1970's up to the present moment) may a fully grown man have sexual intercourse or receive oral sex from a 13 year old child? Don't strain yourself. This is not a trick question. It is elementally simple. The sole valid answer is "never." To do so is criminal today and was criminal then. Roman Polanski did it. Therefore his action was criminal.

WHEN (in the 1970's up to the present moment) may a fully grown man (not a physician) provide controlled substances to a 13 year old child? Don't strain yourself. This, too, is not a trick question. It is elementally simple. The sole valid answer is "never." To do so in the 1970's was criminal and it is still criminal. Roman Polanski did it. Therefore his action was criminal.

So what are you attempting to justify, frog?

Support of a pedophile, child abusing, criminal scumbag like Roman Polanski (even if you are consistently incoherent in your attempt to be supportive of him) is sick. You attempt to provide support for Polanski. Therefore, you are sick. Seriously. You are morally degenerate.

As I've said all through this post i am not condoning Polanski I'm just looking at the facts as told by the victim, and it was not rape.

Actually, you're finding every way possible to rationalize what Polanski did, so you are indeed condoning what he did.

 

[Article 15]

Here's the transcript of her testimony part one.

And part two.

These fucks who are trying to justify Polanski's actions are despicable human beings.

 

[Kat]

Here's the transcript of her testimony part one.

And part two.

These fucks who are trying to justify Polanski's actions are despicable human beings.

So right. And I have posted her testimony..in this thread. I wonder if it was even looked at. Have my doubts.

 

[Moon]

Here's the transcript of her testimony part one.

And part two.

These fucks who are trying to justify Polanski's actions are despicable human beings.

So right. And I have posted her testimony..in this thread. I wonder if it was even looked at. Have my doubts.

I seriously doubt that it was looked at by those that condone raping 13 year old girls. Disgusting animals like that don't want the harsh light of reality to expose their sick desires.

 

[froggy]

It was a crime in the 70's and it remains one to this day. So the fact that drugs were supposedly "everywhere" is totally irrelevant. Giving drugs to a child was criminal. Having sexual intercourse or oral sex with a child was criminal. Forcing sex upon anybody regardless of age was criminal.

In short, you do a lot of babbling but you have managed to say nothing intelligent or intelligible on this topic.

Let's simplify this for you.

WHEN (in the 1970's up to the present moment) may a fully grown man have sexual intercourse or receive oral sex from a 13 year old child? Don't strain yourself. This is not a trick question. It is elementally simple. The sole valid answer is "never." To do so is criminal today and was criminal then. Roman Polanski did it. Therefore his action was criminal.

WHEN (in the 1970's up to the present moment) may a fully grown man (not a physician) provide controlled substances to a 13 year old child? Don't strain yourself. This, too, is not a trick question. It is elementally simple. The sole valid answer is "never." To do so in the 1970's was criminal and it is still criminal. Roman Polanski did it. Therefore his action was criminal.

So what are you attempting to justify, frog?

Support of a pedophile, child abusing, criminal scumbag like Roman Polanski (even if you are consistently incoherent in your attempt to be supportive of him) is sick. You attempt to provide support for Polanski. Therefore, you are sick. Seriously. You are morally degenerate.

As I've said all through this post i am not condoning Polanski I'm just looking at the facts as told by the victim, and it was not rape.

Actually, you're finding every way possible to rationalize what Polanski did, so you are indeed condoning what he did.

No, I've said his having sex with her was wrong all along.

 

[froggy]

Here's the transcript of her testimony part one.

And part two.

These fucks who are trying to justify Polanski's actions are despicable human beings.

So right. And I have posted her testimony..in this thread. I wonder if it was even looked at. Have my doubts.

I seriously doubt that it was looked at by those that condone raping 13 year old girls. Disgusting animals like that don't want the harsh light of reality to expose their sick desires.

Apparently you didn't read it.

 

[editec]

Was what he did immoral?

Seems fairly obvious that it was.

Money talks and criminals walk.

I find it odd that generally people applaude the fact that money speaks with such a powerful voice, but in this case they're so disgusted by that fact.

If, as so many of you apparently want, we neuter government, money will be the only voice any of us ever hear.

Am I going to fast for you?

Remember, apologists for corporate AmeriKKKa, greed is good, right?

Polanski has money, ergo he must be good, too.

Get used to it, folks.

You're getting exactly what you want...money TRUMPED government.

 

[Moon]

As I've said all through this post i am not condoning Polanski I'm just looking at the facts as told by the victim, and it was not rape.

Actually, you're finding every way possible to rationalize what Polanski did, so you are indeed condoning what he did.

No, I've said his having sex with her was wrong all along.

You're working overtime to rationalize what he did. The only logical conclusion is that you condone the rape of a 13 year old girl by an adult male. There is no way on this earth that anything she did could justify being drugged and raped.

 

[Moon]

So right. And I have posted her testimony..in this thread. I wonder if it was even looked at. Have my doubts.

I seriously doubt that it was looked at by those that condone raping 13 year old girls. Disgusting animals like that don't want the harsh light of reality to expose their sick desires.

Apparently you didn't read it.

I've read it before. She was raped.

 

[Middleman]

What a freaking lie. Obviously you did not read the article.

You are kidding me, so the Swiss are soft on crime!?!?!?

Try reading between the lines when you get a chance.

.

We have been down this road before. You believe it is okay to have sex...''forceful or not''
with a female of any age..so I don't need to read between ANY lines. I know what you are.

Hopefully, there is a law requiring sites such as this to report these types of posters, along with IP numbers, to the FBI. The guy no doubt a pedophile and has illegal child porn on his computer. I hope his name goes into a database and his ass lands in a prison cell with Big Bubba.

 

[editec]

You are kidding me, so the Swiss are soft on crime!?!?!?

Try reading between the lines when you get a chance.

.

We have been down this road before. You believe it is okay to have sex...''forceful or not''
with a female of any age..so I don't need to read between ANY lines. I know what you are.

Hopefully, there is a law requiring sites such as this to report these types of posters, along with IP numbers, to the FBI. The guy no doubt a pedophile and has illegal child porn on his computer. I hope his name goes into a database and his ass lands in a prison cell with Big Bubba.

Let me guess...normally you hate BIG GOVERNMENT, right?

Except when you don't, of course.

Hey, you're not alone in that respect.

I ALSO hate big government, until, of course, I approve of it.

Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

 

[Kat]

We have been down this road before. You believe it is okay to have sex...''forceful or not''
with a female of any age..so I don't need to read between ANY lines. I know what you are.

Hopefully, there is a law requiring sites such as this to report these types of posters, along with IP numbers, to the FBI. The guy no doubt a pedophile and has illegal child porn on his computer. I hope his name goes into a database and his ass lands in a prison cell with Big Bubba.

Let me guess...normally you hate BIG GOVERNMENT, right?

Except when you don't, of course.

Hey, you're not alone in that respect.

I ALSO hate big government, until, of course, I approve of it.

Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

umm why are you trolling this thread?

Big or small government has nothing to do with this topic. It has to do with a rape that took place over 30 years ago.

 

[Contumacious]

She was a scared, drugged 13 year old girl.

Bullshit. By her own admission she was a Lolita.

.

Such a lie. Such a lie. Have you no shame?

He picked me up again on March 10 at around 4 p.m. In the car he asked me if I'd ever had sex. I had,

That's when he takes out the Quaaludes and asks me if I've ever had one. ....and say yes.


Then Anjelica Huston [who was Jack Nicholson's girlfriend at the time] knocked on the door. I assume she asked him, "What are you doing in my room?" I started to get dressed, but Polanski came back and said, "Lay back down," and he took off my underwear. He had been interrupted, so he finished—briefly—then went back to talk to her

If you read her testimony you know she was raped. By her own testimony she said NO..

That was grand jury testimony which was not subjected to cross examination and where she was coached by the prosecutor.

It is rape either way. Even if she said yes..she was 13..he was 44.

He was never charged with rape.

 

[Kat]

Bullshit. By her own admission she was a Lolita.

.

Such a lie. Such a lie. Have you no shame?

He picked me up again on March 10 at around 4 p.m. In the car he asked me if I'd ever had sex. I had,

That's when he takes out the Quaaludes and asks me if I've ever had one. ....and say yes.


Then Anjelica Huston [who was Jack Nicholson's girlfriend at the time] knocked on the door. I assume she asked him, "What are you doing in my room?" I started to get dressed, but Polanski came back and said, "Lay back down," and he took off my underwear. He had been interrupted, so he finished—briefly—then went back to talk to her

If you read her testimony you know she was raped. By her own testimony she said NO..

That was grand jury testimony which was not subjected to cross examination and where she was coached by the prosecutor.

It is rape either way. Even if she said yes..she was 13..he was 44.

He was never charged with rape.

Her saying she had had sex meant it was okay to rape her? LOL!!! WOW
I don't care if she had sex a million times...if she said no..it was rape...and her being 13 and him 44, it was rape. Double rape.

What's your point about cross examination? She gave her testimony.


No..he was not charged with rape. Being the worm he is..he KNEW what he did..so he did a plea for a lesser charge. But. He DID rape her.

 

[daveman]

He was never charged with rape.

Then you wouldn't object to the same treatment she received, would you?

 

[froggy]

Why aren't they charging the mother with child neglect, how much money did she received in the plea bargain. At the time of Polanski's plea, a lawyer for the family of the victim wrote Rittenband and urged him to accept the deal, thereby sparing the child from testifying before a media horde and having her identity publicly disclosed. "Whatever harm has come to her as a victim would be exacerbated in the extreme if this case went to trial," wrote attorney Lawrence Silver. "This is not the place for a recovering young girl. Was it because they new she'd break under cross examination.

What a railroad job getting him to give up his rights knowing good and well (that is the DA and judge) they had no intention of keeping their word. By this he gave up the right to face his accuser, have her cross examined.

 

[Contumacious]

What's your point about cross examination? She gave her testimony.

The Sixth Amendment - confrontation clause - does not permit the prosecution to prove its case via ex parte out-of-court affidavits, and the admission of such evidence against a defendant.

The main purposes of cross-examination are to elicit favorable facts from the witness, or to impeach the credibility of the testifying witness to lessen the weight of unfavorable testimony. Cross-examination frequently produces critical evidence in trials, especially if a witness contradicts previous testimony.

.

 

[Contumacious]

What a railroad job getting him to give up his rights knowing good and well (that is the DA and judge) they had no intention of keeping their word. By this he gave up the right to face his accuser, have her cross examined.

Exactly.

Our judicial system is corrupt to its core.

.

 

[Liability]

Was what he did immoral?

Seems fairly obvious that it was.

Money talks and criminals walk.

I find it odd that generally people applaude the fact that money speaks with such a powerful voice, but in this case they're so disgusted by that fact.

If, as so many of you apparently want, we neuter government, money will be the only voice any of us ever hear.

Am I going to fast for you?

Remember, apologists for corporate AmeriKKKa, greed is good, right?

Polanski has money, ergo he must be good, too.

Get used to it, folks.

You're getting exactly what you want...money TRUMPED government.

Wrong, stupid.

I'd suggest that you should stop being such a fucking retard, but that would be like telling you not to breathe.

Polanski had money and a good lawyer. He took his plea and faced the consequences until he turned into the sniveling pussy and acted every bit as cowardly as you'd expect a pedophile to be. He ran away.

It is the so-called liberal intelligentsia who advocate to 'just let it go." You know the drill. Assholes like Whoopi Goldberg arguing that it was rape but it wasn't "rape rape." Fucking morons. Fuck you scumbags.

Switzerland may be acting on the impetus of money, but their insidious official action is completely unrelated to justice.

And just because you are an asshole doesn't mean that anybody else buys the shit you peddle, douche-y. You are a lost little retard in a world far beyond your ability to comprehend. So keep your dim-wit philosophy to yourself.

What's needed at this point is a little self-help.

Have some of our best agents go ad kidnap that dick-less little pedophile and spirit him out of Switzerland and into American custody. It won't happen, sadly. But that would at least qualify as justice. Fuck Switzerland. Those fuckers need to get sanctioned.

 

[Liability]

Bullshit. By her own admission she was a Lolita.

.

Such a lie. Such a lie. Have you no shame?

He picked me up again on March 10 at around 4 p.m. In the car he asked me if I'd ever had sex. I had,

That's when he takes out the Quaaludes and asks me if I've ever had one. ....and say yes.


Then Anjelica Huston [who was Jack Nicholson's girlfriend at the time] knocked on the door. I assume she asked him, "What are you doing in my room?" I started to get dressed, but Polanski came back and said, "Lay back down," and he took off my underwear. He had been interrupted, so he finished—briefly—then went back to talk to her

If you read her testimony you know she was raped. By her own testimony she said NO..

That was grand jury testimony which was not subjected to cross examination and where she was coached by the prosecutor.

It is rape either way. Even if she said yes..she was 13..he was 44.

He was never charged with rape.

Yes he most certainly WAS charged with rape you scumbag lying sack of shit.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/arts/polanski/1977polanski_findlaw.pdf

Try looking at Count IV, you dishonest pin dick.