No.
The "reason" to get him BACK here and to incarcerate him is because he pled guilty; and child molesting pieces of shit like him need to get punished -- and the operation of the rule of law should not be set-aside just because a bunch of stupid libs find his case to be the next urgent "social justice" issue du jour.
Most people probably didn't even know (or give any thought to whether or not) Polanski is allegedly a Jew. That notion of yoursis dumber than most of the crap you tend to spew.
.
And you are the "Conservative Role Model"? So what is the difference nowadays between "conservatism" and a theocratic regime.
You fuckers are always looking for pretexts to set aside due process of law in favor of legal lynching, in the name of god, of course..
.
You already asked that nonsensical question earlier, you shitbrain. I pointed out to you then that the law against raping children has nothing to do with theocracy. Nothing in this entire thread actually deals with theocracy. You are mouthing words entirely out of context to make you desperately desired "point." You fail again.
I have not sought to "set aside" due process, jerkoff.
The scumbag, Polanski, GOT due process and YOU remain totally unable to demonstrate in ANY WAY that he was denied due process anywhere along the line.
Good God. You are unimaginably stupid.
