Swine Flu Internment Camp Documents Revealed: Refuse quarantine? It's off to camp FEM

Beck! Calling Glenn Beck!! BECK!!!
come on, not even Beck is touching this one
that should tell you SOMETHING

There are only so many on the air hours in a day and he has to pick and chose which crazy, off the wall, sensational conspiracy theory he is going to promote on any given day. :lol:
is it an insane conspiracy theory if he turns out to be right?
 
Ass-achusetts voted on a law that was passed a few months ago. It's called get the flu shot or we come into your house and give it to you!!!!! Look it up obamaloonies!!!! Deval patrick gov of mass is obama's butt buddy!! He follows hussein's advice on everything!! First liberal loonie state to order people to get the swineflu shot!!!! Ass-achusetts sucks!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to get out!!!!!!!
 
This would only happen in the instance of a widespread flu epidemic.

Most people if asked to say in their home, would stay in their home.

Do you know what would happen if you were diagnosed with confirmed tuberculosis?
 
Ass-achusetts voted on a law that was passed a few months ago. It's called get the flu shot or we come into your house and give it to you!!!!! Look it up obamaloonies!!!! Deval patrick gov of mass is obama's butt buddy!! He follows hussein's advice on everything!! First liberal loonie state to order people to get the swineflu shot!!!! Ass-achusetts sucks!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to get out!!!!!!!

You can't be a real poster - you must be a joke.

No one uses that many exclamation points and is a serious poster.
 
Ass-achusetts voted on a law that was passed a few months ago. It's called get the flu shot or we come into your house and give it to you!!!!! Look it up obamaloonies!!!! Deval patrick gov of mass is obama's butt buddy!! He follows hussein's advice on everything!! First liberal loonie state to order people to get the swineflu shot!!!! Ass-achusetts sucks!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to get out!!!!!!!

You can't be a real poster - you must be a joke.

No one uses that many exclamation points and is a serious poster.
just smile and nod

;)
 
This would only happen in the instance of a widespread flu epidemic.

Most people if asked to say in their home, would stay in their home.

Do you know what would happen if you were diagnosed with confirmed tuberculosis?
did you actually check the links he posted

LOL
Badacci had a proclamation back in april with an expire of 30 days
and this is the nonsense they are running with
 
Ass-achusetts voted on a law that was passed a few months ago. It's called get the flu shot or we come into your house and give it to you!!!!! Look it up obamaloonies!!!! Deval patrick gov of mass is obama's butt buddy!! He follows hussein's advice on everything!! First liberal loonie state to order people to get the swineflu shot!!!! Ass-achusetts sucks!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to get out!!!!!!!

You can't be a real poster - you must be a joke.

No one uses that many exclamation points and is a serious poster.
just smile and nod

;)

When I see someone like that ranting on the street appearing to argue with someone who is not there, I generally look away and walk quickly.
 
Ass-achusetts voted on a law that was passed a few months ago. It's called get the flu shot or we come into your house and give it to you!!!!! Look it up obamaloonies!!!! Deval patrick gov of mass is obama's butt buddy!! He follows hussein's advice on everything!! First liberal loonie state to order people to get the swineflu shot!!!! Ass-achusetts sucks!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to get out!!!!!!!



:eusa_liar: :cuckoo:
 
the bills have been written..




It's a medical RECOMMENDATION not a legal mandate. :rolleyes:



Use of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine


Flu Facts: What You Need to Know


And there are preparations in place for pandemic flu.


SECTION 10
- LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PANDEMIC INFLUENZA -
The Legal Considerations Section includes the following subsections:
• Legal Issues
Describes substantive legal issues that are likely to arise in a pandemic and how they are being addressed.
• Legal Resources
Lists available legal resources and indicates where they may be found. These include model documents such as legal orders that the Commissioner might issue; background documents on websites; etc.
• Partnerships and Outreach
Describes committees and advisory groups that have legal components and/or are addressing legal issues.
• Training
Describes past, current and future training programs on legal issues.
• Other Agencies
Lists legal issues that are the responsibility of other state agencies.
• Miscellaneous
Addresses additional minor legal issues.
LEGAL ISSUES
1. Emergency Declarations
There are two statutes in Massachusetts that allow the Governor to declare an emergency.
Public Health Emergency. Under M.G.L. c. 17, § 2A, if the Governor declares that an emergency exists which is detrimental to the public health, the DPH Commissioner may, with the approval of the Governor and the Public Health Council, “take such action and incur such liabilities as he may deem necessary to assure the maintenance of public health and the prevention of disease.” In addition, with the approval of the Public Health Council, the Commissioner may “establish procedures to be followed during such emergency to insure the continuation of essential public health services and the enforcement of the same.”
•
Pandemic Period: The Commissioner and senior DPH staff will be in continuous close touch with the Governor’s office. If the Commissioner determines that the situation warrants a declaration of public health emergency based on epidemiological information, speed of disease spread, etc., he would request that the Governor issue such a declaration. Once the declaration is made, the Commissioner would have all necessary authority to issue orders; waive statutes and regulations that impede emergency response; seize property if necessary, etc.

State of Emergency. Under Chapter 639 of the Acts of 1950, the Governor may declare a state of emergency due to (among other circumstances) “the occurrence of any disaster or catastrophe resulting from attack, sabotage or other hostile action; or from riot or other civil disturbance; or from fire, flood, earthquake or other natural causes.” Because an influenza pandemic can be considered a catastrophe resulting from natural causes, the Governor might decide to declare a state of emergency concurrent with declaring a public health emergency, or without declaring a public health emergency.
By the terms of the statute, a state of emergency confers upon the Governor extraordinary powers to protect the lives and property of the citizens of the Commonwealth and to enforce the laws. In practice, if a state of emergency were declared during a pandemic, MEMA would activate the State Emergency Operations Center and DPH would be a crucial participant in emergency response under ESF-8. It is expected that the Governor would delegate broad health-related powers to the DPH Commissioner, with the result that there would be little if any practical difference between a declared public health emergency and a declared state of emergency.
DPH legal counsel are familiar with the powers available under both types of emergency declarations, and would advise policy makers on appropriate legal means to achieve policy goals.
2. Restrictions on Personal Liberty
Isolation and Quarantine. Legal preparations have been and are continuing to be made to isolate or quarantine individuals or groups of people, should DPH policy makers decide that such measures are necessary to protect the public health during the Pandemic Alert Period and/or the Pandemic Period.
•
•
•
•
Massachusetts statutes and regulations authorize isolation and quarantine for diseases dangerous to the public health.
Legal materials for isolation and quarantine of individuals, originally developed for SARS, have been modified for pandemic flu. These are complied into a set of documents known as “Legal Nuts and Bolts of Isolation and Quarantine,” available from the DPH Office of General Counsel and the Health Education Unit, Division of Epidemiology and Immunization. They include documents that state and local health authorities would use for stepwise enforcement of isolation and quarantine, beginning with letters requesting voluntary cooperation, up to court pleadings and related documents to compel isolation.
Due process protections have been considered in drafting these documents, guided by the principle that whatever measure is used should be the least restrictive of personal liberty while protecting public health. Non-custodial orders (e.g. home isolation) may be appealed by a telephone call to a health official, while custodial measures (e.g. isolation in a hospital) would in most cases require a court order. Efforts will be made to ensure that people who are subject to court proceedings for mandatory isolation or quarantine have access to attorneys. Judges may be contacted at any time, day or night, through the State Police.
Other Restrictions on Personal Liberty. It is possible that a wide variety of other measures might become necessary to protect the public health during a Pandemic Alert Period or Pandemic Period, some of which impose certain restrictions on personal liberty. Examples include requiring people to self-monitor for medical conditions; requiring medical evaluations and/or vaccinations, prophylaxis, or medical treatment; closing businesses, public transportation; etc.
Templates have been drafted for orders that the DPH Commissioner could issue during a public health emergency, and additional templates are in process. The templates include findings or statements that the measures being ordered are the least restrictive alternative or the most reasonable way to address the threat to public health.
Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Plan
 
Last edited:
18 child deaths following vaccinations

Beezy Marsh, Health Correspondent
Published: 12:01AM GMT 13 Feb 2006


Dr Richard Halvorsen Eighteen babies and toddlers have died following childhood vaccinations in just four years, a secret Government report reveals.

Four deaths have been linked to suspected adverse reactions to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) triple jab, according to documents prepared for the Government's expert advisers on immunisation.

The controversial jab has been beset by fears of a link to autism and bowel disease, although since its introduction in 1998, yearly deaths from measles have fallen from 16 to zero, while the jab against meningitis C is thought to save 50 lives a year.

The report, covering the period between 2001 and 2004, details how one baby suffered a cot death following MMR vaccination in 2003. Two more infants were reported to have died after having the MMR jab in 2001, but the cause of death in both cases was unknown.

After the death of a child who developed meningitis and swelling of the brain three weeks after an MMR jab in 2004, a claim for compensation was made by the child's parents. It is not known if this was successful.

Six fatalities followed meningitis C vaccinations between 2001 and 2003. The deaths of seven other babies were linked to combined vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough and reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). They include a baby who died from a heart attack. Another died after a polio jab.

Almost 800 other reports of suspected complications of childhood vaccination - including convulsions and hyptonia, in which the baby becomes floppy like a "rag doll" - were also made, including 160 for MMR.

Medics raised the alarm under the MHRA "yellow card" warning system, set up to monitor suspected adverse drug reactions. Although making such a report does not prove that vaccination caused death or injury, it means that doctors fear it may have played a part.

Their reports were considered by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, which concluded that no significant safety issues were identified.

Details of the document, which emerged after a request under the Freedom of Information Act, come amid fears of "vaccine overload" due to a rise in the number of jabs given to infants.

The Department of Health last week announced the introduction of a new jab against the pneumococcal bug, which causes a deadly strain of meningitis, in addition to a booster for Hib disease, which can cause meningitis. This means that by the time a child is two he will have had 25 vaccinations, although some will be given in five-in-one or three-in-one combinations


Secret report reveals 18 child deaths following vaccinations - Telegraph
 
which is taking what she said WAY out of context

Most side effects of the drugs approved in the US are more than just minor annoyances, see, we don't have as many choices. Almost all drugs in the US have a risk of death, even vaccines, but few people know about that risk. Most people don't even look at the ingredients to check if there is anything they are allergic to in there. Most don't even realize they are experiencing side effects afterward because they don't look into that. One time vaccines have shorter side effects, and luckily fewer people have died from those, but people do die from vaccines. The flu shots, for example, there are people allergic to the ingredients quite often, many of us can't take them because of medication conflicts (even if I wanted them I couldn't touch them or I'd have a heart attack), I can't touch any steroids, anything with egg, and a few other such medication types because of meds I am taking and allergies. Also, I am sensitive to toxic chemicals, ie, anything artificial I cannot have injected, my liver must process it.
 
which is taking what she said WAY out of context

Actually no, it's not. We're talking about the benefits of getting flu shots and she states "anything you inject straight into the blood stream has a higher risk of killing you. Vaccines can kill you as well". Not only did she think you inject a flu shot into the blood (again, you need to put this IN context of the discussion), but claimed it can kill you. When I pointed this out in subsequent posts in relation to the flu shot, she didn't even bother to clarify, refute, or otherwise correct her original inaccuracies.
 
Last edited:
which is taking what she said WAY out of context

Actually no, it's not. We're talking about the benefits of getting flu shots and she states "anything you inject straight into the blood stream has a higher risk of killing you. Vaccines can kill you as well". Not only did she think you inject a flu shot into the blood (again, you need to put this IN context of the discussion), but claimed it can kill you. When I pointed this out in subsequent posts in relation to the flu shot, she didn't even bother to clarify, refute, or otherwise correct her original inaccuracies.
and some people have died from vaccines
nothing she said was as extreme as you are claiming
 

Forum List

Back
Top