Sweden to expel 80,000 "refugees"

Sure you do. You got confused with asylum seeker and refugee.


Typical nonsense. You got Millions of Illegal persons pouring across Europe and USA borders and you want to argue about what to call them?

So, apparently European taxpayers are expected to pay many BILLIONS so the "refugees" can ALL get their teeth fixed! Can you believe the audacity of these filthy Welfare Queens!

€10,000 PER dental treatment!

Hey, who gives a f-ck about your teeth? Answer, most of Europe doesn't that's who. THIS is so on our next set of literature and free DVDs that our organisations hand-out free on the streets of now 15 European nations.

German Dentists Warn Treating Migrant's 'Catastrophic' Teeth Will Cost Tax Payer BILLIONS

Now we're talking about something else. If you're a refugee, then you should be provided with enough to keep you going, dental treatment is a necessity in some cases.

10,000 euros for dental treatment? Maybe in some cases, but what else do you do? Just leave them in pain and tell them to get lost?

The point here is that the government has decided to do something, this may not be the right choice of thing to do. If someone didn't bother with good dental treatment at home, then they shouldn't bother giving it to them unless it is an emergency.

But again, this is a political decision.

I just refuse to make responses to you, you are simply Pathological Altruistic x 1000 and Turbo-Charged.

Leave them in pain and tell them to get lost? Yes, this is exactly what we should do. We OWE them NOTHING. We owe our own European peoples EVERYTHING....how many of our OWN people need dental care and healthcare?

As the saying is - Charity begins at HOME. Period.

Oh, what a shame.

Charity begins at home, then people moan about welfare.

You're not making any sense at all now.
 
Sure you do. You got confused with asylum seeker and refugee.
refugee
noun exile, asylum seeker, émigré, displaced person, runaway, fugitive, escapee, stateless person an application for refugee status
Collins Thesaurus of the English Language – Complete and Unabridged 2nd Edition. 2002 © HarperCollins Publishers 1995, 2002

Colloquially, they have the same meaning. Legally, they do not.

No, colloquially they still don't have the same meaning.

For people who want life simple, black and white, then maybe they see the definition of both as "dirty foreigner who wants to get into my country", but for people with brain cells, an asylum seeker is:

"
A person who has left their home country as a political refugee and is seeking asylum in another:"

And a refugee is:

"A person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster:"

An asylum seeker made the decision to leave because they felt they could no longer stay because of political reasons.
A refugee left because everything in their country has gone to hell.

There are different reasons for leaving the country. An asylum seeker is seeking asylum, this might be permanent. A refugee is in another country until the situation gets better back home.

Not necessarily.

The requirements to qualify for both refugee status and asylum are, for the most part, the same. The acceptable reasons for why they have left their home countries are comparable, the significant difference between the two is the physical location in which they apply for the status.

I think most people would accept that Syrians have a valid reason for leaving their country. People from Pakistan, Afghanistan etc, are they coming because of war or natural disaster? Not really, Afghanistan has settled down, people could migrate from one place to another in Afghanistan.

Syria is a disaster, Pakistan and Afghanistan are not.

There's a big difference. Now, a Pakistani who is running away from the govt, well, they put themselves in this situation most likely, and they could go to India or any other country.

Syria, there's a big problem, there are masses of people leaving, camps in Lebanon and Turkey are full to exploding.

I see a massive difference, even if the procedure for dealing with these remains the same in some countries.
Syrian men should be staying and fighting for their own country instead of running away and expecting others to do it for them.
 
Syrian men should be staying and fighting for their own country instead of running away and expecting others to do it for them.


15 years of working with and training Afghan and we still there. Not only that they try to kill the US soldiers from within training. WTH? Iraq.......they ran from ISIS, left all sorts of US hardware. Not worth it. Let them all kill each other. When weakened.........go mop it up.
 
I think most people would accept that Syrians have a valid reason for leaving their country.


No Muslims. they don't assimilate. They want YOU to change for them. The Quran requires the assist the Terrorist to further Islam. No mas Mosque. Keep them in the Muslim countries.

Funny that, seeing as I've seen Muslims who have assimilated.

Some Muslims are as you say, some aren't. But just painting everyone the same is easier, isn't it?
 
refugee
noun exile, asylum seeker, émigré, displaced person, runaway, fugitive, escapee, stateless person an application for refugee status
Collins Thesaurus of the English Language – Complete and Unabridged 2nd Edition. 2002 © HarperCollins Publishers 1995, 2002

Colloquially, they have the same meaning. Legally, they do not.

No, colloquially they still don't have the same meaning.

For people who want life simple, black and white, then maybe they see the definition of both as "dirty foreigner who wants to get into my country", but for people with brain cells, an asylum seeker is:

"
A person who has left their home country as a political refugee and is seeking asylum in another:"

And a refugee is:

"A person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster:"

An asylum seeker made the decision to leave because they felt they could no longer stay because of political reasons.
A refugee left because everything in their country has gone to hell.

There are different reasons for leaving the country. An asylum seeker is seeking asylum, this might be permanent. A refugee is in another country until the situation gets better back home.

Not necessarily.

The requirements to qualify for both refugee status and asylum are, for the most part, the same. The acceptable reasons for why they have left their home countries are comparable, the significant difference between the two is the physical location in which they apply for the status.

I think most people would accept that Syrians have a valid reason for leaving their country. People from Pakistan, Afghanistan etc, are they coming because of war or natural disaster? Not really, Afghanistan has settled down, people could migrate from one place to another in Afghanistan.

Syria is a disaster, Pakistan and Afghanistan are not.

There's a big difference. Now, a Pakistani who is running away from the govt, well, they put themselves in this situation most likely, and they could go to India or any other country.

Syria, there's a big problem, there are masses of people leaving, camps in Lebanon and Turkey are full to exploding.

I see a massive difference, even if the procedure for dealing with these remains the same in some countries.
Syrian men should be staying and fighting for their own country instead of running away and expecting others to do it for them.

Well, they did stand up and fight, and look where it got them!!!

They can't beat Assad, with Putin by his side, they can't beat ISIS on their own, having two fronts, and then there are plenty of different groups who want to turn Syria into their view of Syria. So people decided that if it was a choice of stalemate or get out, they got out.
 
Syrian men should be staying and fighting for their own country instead of running away and expecting others to do it for them.


15 years of working with and training Afghan and we still there. Not only that they try to kill the US soldiers from within training. WTH? Iraq.......they ran from ISIS, left all sorts of US hardware. Not worth it. Let them all kill each other. When weakened.........go mop it up.

Neither asked for the US to come in. But now they're supposed to be grateful for US interference.
 

Forum List

Back
Top