Susan Rice defends her Benghazi remarks


Petraeus, Clapper have both said it was 'immediately known' that the video had absolutely nothing to do with Benghazi. Nothing to do with 'spontaneous riots.'

Oh but Petraeus, and Clapper must've conspired to keep the info from the WH, I mean they would have so much to gain by doing so!!

Do you really think that? So, either Petraus and Clapper withheld the intel, which since WH claims to only have changed two words, wasn't the case OR Susan Rice's claim of 'best intelligence' a the time is a lie.
 
Petraeus, Clapper have both said it was 'immediately known' that the video had absolutely nothing to do with Benghazi. Nothing to do with 'spontaneous riots.'

Oh but Petraeus, and Clapper must've conspired to keep the info from the WH, I mean they would have so much to gain by doing so!!

Do you really think that? So, either Petraus and Clapper withheld the intel, which since WH claims to only have changed two words, wasn't the case OR Susan Rice's claim of 'best intelligence' a the time is a lie.

There's a larger question.

Why does the CIA know EXACTLY what's going on when these sorts of events happen?

And why are we DEPENDING on them for information?

It's not just they know exactly whats going on..it's that they know it in realtime.

Like they were in the area.
 
The information she read was the "unclassified" intelligence at that point. Yes, the CIA and FBI expected that it was a terrorist attack, but that was "classified." It was not something they wanted plastered all over the news shows on Sunday morning.

Now really, is that so hard for you to understand?

AH, so it that MAKE IT OK she went around an BLAMED it on a American CITIZEN and some youtube film..

like i said, you all better make her Sec. of State, she'd fit in with this lying administration
 
She is the typical piece of shit liberal that thinks she can either openly lie to the American public or be an incompetant fool in front of the American public, then stand on a podium wagging her finger at anyone that questions her actions/words.

This country is doomed with these scumbags in charge.
 
Oh but Petraeus, and Clapper must've conspired to keep the info from the WH, I mean they would have so much to gain by doing so!!

Do you really think that? So, either Petraus and Clapper withheld the intel, which since WH claims to only have changed two words, wasn't the case OR Susan Rice's claim of 'best intelligence' a the time is a lie.

There's a larger question.

Why does the CIA know EXACTLY what's going on when these sorts of events happen?

And why are we DEPENDING on them for information?

It's not just they know exactly whats going on..it's that they know it in realtime.

Like they were in the area.
Another disturbing question is why after almost three months, does obama not know anything?
 
What Susan Rice did is indefensible. She lied. Saying that it was the best information she had without disclosing the source of that information is part of the reason she is incompetent to be Secretary of State. And, if all that isn't enough, the very fact that she needed to be infantilized by obama makes her incompetent to hold the office. Does he intend to run around the world making sure everyone treats this little girl nice?
 
The major point is the administration knew this was a terrorist attack and neglected to tell the American people in a timely manner.
 
Idiot...the CIA had a drone(s) over Libya probably going back to the attacks on Libya by US and European warplanes.

The CIA had real-time video of the attack from the drone(s) that was fed to the White House.....uh, Obamination watched the attack and did nothing.

The CIA and State Department people "under attack" called back to the US to tell them real-time what was going on at the compounds....so again Obamination knew what was going on.

Obamination decided to do nothing because F-16s from Italy dropping bombs on Libya after he declared AQ dead...wouldn't look good for his campaign. He decided to let the Americans die, cover it up with some video story lie and continues to hide documents to prevent a public backlash and possible jail time.

Got that, dumbfuck?

Oh but Petraeus, and Clapper must've conspired to keep the info from the WH, I mean they would have so much to gain by doing so!!

Do you really think that? So, either Petraus and Clapper withheld the intel, which since WH claims to only have changed two words, wasn't the case OR Susan Rice's claim of 'best intelligence' a the time is a lie.

There's a larger question.

Why does the CIA know EXACTLY what's going on when these sorts of events happen?

And why are we DEPENDING on them for information?

It's not just they know exactly whats going on..it's that they know it in realtime.

Like they were in the area.
 
Last edited:
Wow, it take some person to defend lying to the people of this country

You mean like.....

...FAUX Noise?

"Last night, in a report on the horrific school shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, Bill O'Reilly discussed with Fox News senior correspondent Rick Leventhal how the media - including Fox News - got some of its facts wrong in its early reporting, including mistakenly identifying the gunman as his brother. Leventhal told O'Reilly, "Bill, you can understand, in the aftermath of a major incident like this, there's a lot of confusion."

:ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1:

FAUX LIED!!!!!!!!!!
 
Did the CIA leave the part out about it being about the video?

If they didn't know the real reason, and they are trying to convince us they did not, then why make up a story about a video, especially since everyone knew it was not about the video. For two weeks Carney was saying it was. Too much lying coming from this administration for their not to be something wrong.
 
:ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1: . :ack-1:

FAUX LIED!!!!!!!!!!


woman-screaming-2.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top