Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by Statistikhengst, Jun 24, 2014.
I am sure you are smart enough to understand why those aren't equivalent.
Sure, those would be folks voting for the Republican candidate, not the Democrat.
In a whole precinct not a single vote was cast for a sitting President?
Rabbi would be outraged.....statistical impossibility and all
Yeah, all right I was right. You are not smart enough to see the difference between a district with 20 votes and a district with thousands of votes.
You don't find it puzzling that they had 108% turnout in that county?
Look up what voter turnout is and then what voter registration is
Hisses the forum jester who doesn't know the difference between a precinct and a district.
First of all, there were other precincts in other states which also recorded 0 votes for Obama, but more to the point, if the precincts which recorded 0 votes for Romney were due to fraud, then certainly, you can produce thousands of disenfranchised Romney voters screaming they voted for Romney in any of the precincts where Romney got no votes.........
1) Ignore the point.
2) Move the goalposts.
You are intellectually worthless. The mental equivalent of spoiled potato salad.
Hillary is inevitable!! She's the next POTUS!! She can't be stopped. No one can beat her!! She'll win all 57 States!!
Yet somehow, even though she is only running against herself, she is dropping in the polls.....
Nothing to worry about though, the science is settled!!
fine let me clear up my misspoken question.
You don't find it puzzling that they had 108% voter registration?
It's called fraud.
Separate names with a comma.