Paul Revere
Member
The terrorists thank you for your loyal and continued support MM
I seriously doubt that Cheney and Bush would thank him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The terrorists thank you for your loyal and continued support MM
I seriously doubt that Cheney and Bush would thank him.
The terrorists thank you for your loyal and continued support MM
When I see all the "support" Dems are giving the troops - I think of Tokyo Rose and Neville Chamberlain
Must be a bit of free association going on in your mind then. What are the connections, if any?
There is little, if any, support of the troops at the anti war rallies
Elected Dems have called the troops terrorists, uneducated, compared them to Nazi's and Pol Pot
At these rallies, the anti war peace niks have burned a US soldier in Effigy
There are a few Dems who get it - Joe Liberman, Zell Miller, and Ed Koch
Read the other thread
BTW it was not a "botched joke" it was an insult
The troops can do without the support of the Dems. The troops are trying to win the war - Dems are trying to lose it
Leaving aside your interpretation of Kerry's stupid joke let's look at your assertion in the last sentence.
In Iraq there is no "war". There were two distinct phases to this operation. One was the invasion. Successful. The second was the occupation. Now to be reasonable and fair an occupation can only be judged on what it seeks to achieve. The occupation of Germany was a success, very difficult at times, but a success for the West. The occupation of Germany by the Soviets and the establishment of the GDR was a failure in the end for the Soviet bloc. Agreed? The occupation of Japan was a success? Agreed.
The occupation of Iraq continues. So far it hasn't succeeded. The administration is, to be blunt, fucking the occupation up. It is tossing more and more troops into the meat grinder, 'stay the course'. The Democrats can see that the administration hasn't got a clue about how to make the occupation work. That the administration hasn't a clue isn't surprising. There is no exit plan because there was no intent to exit.
Let me ask you a straight question and I'd appreciate a straight answer. Leaving aside for a moment the numbers of deaths of Iraqis, how many US military personnel should be killed and shockingly maimed before you would pull the pin? The Democratic Party has said that it's enough, what's wrong with that? What's wrong with them saying no more of your troops should be killed in this failed enterprise? But since you want it to continue, tell me, at what point would you say, that's it, it's just not worth it? What numbers would need to fall for you to make that decision?
Dems believe by leaving Iraq now the terrorists will lay down their guns and bombs and become law abiding citizens
Dems believe the terrorists will not kill those who are helping the US set up the govenment
Dems believe Iran will not step in and help the terrorists take over the country
Dems believe the terrorists and Iran qill not use the oil revenues from Iraq to finance terrorist operations
Dems believe if the US leaves Iraq the terrorists will stop their attacks on US interests
As I said, we can do without the Dems support
Translation - do not confuse the Dem talking points with facts
why not actually address the points I made instead of running away from them?
why not actually address the points I made instead of running away from them?
I have
You are running a marathon
I have
You are running a marathon
And you're playing dodgeball.