Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Billy_Kinetta, Jun 4, 2018.
Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.
The decision in this thread's OP.
And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.
I thought the Red Hen was simply the owner refusing service to anyone for any reason?
The Laity Bakers are alleging, Religious morals.
I think the The Red Hen can turn away anyone because of their character. But it must be proven. Gays have proven they unanimously line up behind deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch and have since the 1960s. So rejecting that behavior has a basis in uber-documented fact.
From a legal standpoint an owner can not deny service because of membership in a protected class such as, race, national origin, religion, etc.. depending on state laws. I don't think working for an asshole qualifies.
'Deviant' Sex Acts That Science Says Are Good For You
No law shall be established or created that infringes on the freedom of Religion.
The 14th amendment violates this.
How about bending over and showing kids watching as another guy mock-rams your asshole while you're on a float in a "pride" parade? Do people who promote and embrace that identity and concept in pride qualify as a protected class?
If, in their Bible, Jesus tells them that's how they must sometimes fight back against their oppressors, then it seems they're just exercising their 1st Amendment rights. On the other hand, all Bibles are fairy tales, filled with stupid rules and self-contradictions, so why get your panties all bunched over any of it?
Separate names with a comma.