Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction

Modbert

Daydream Believer
Sep 2, 2008
33,178
3,055
48
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.

:lol:
 
Not surprising. I wonder if they set it up so two of the more conservative justices were the ones rejecting it.
 
This story is getting old. It's phoney. Hillary's scare tactics didn't work. Let's move on and actually work for the betterment of the nation.
 
Good, now maybe others will stop with the bullshit and criticize the asshole for legitimate reasons.
 
Good, now maybe others will stop with the bullshit and criticize the asshole for legitimate reasons.

Wishful thinking. Why go through the effort of creating a well thought, researched critique of someone when its easier to yell "OBAMAZ WAS BORNZ IN KENYA" or as a throwback "BUSHCHIMPYMcHITLER!"
 
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.
:lol:
LOL now there is a combination i would never have believed
i doubt she is any good at either job
 
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.

:lol:

So they refused to hear another case about Obama's birth, gee, what a surprise....
 
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.
:lol:
LOL now there is a combination i would never have believed
i doubt she is any good at either job

Supposedly speaks 5 languages as well. The law degree was an online program, but she did pass the Bar, so that makes it offical.

And her name LETS ME DO THIS!!!!!

o_rly.jpg
 
Good, now maybe others will stop with the bullshit and criticize the asshole for legitimate reasons.

Wishful thinking. Why go through the effort of creating a well thought, researched critique of someone when its easier to yell "OBAMAZ WAS BORNZ IN KENYA" or as a throwback "BUSHCHIMPYMcHITLER!"

why go through the effort of creating a well thought, researched critique of someone when it's easier to yell "You're a racist cuz you dont' support obamacare" or you're a "homophobe cuz you support prop 8" or "you're a bigot cuz you support SB1070"
 
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.

:lol:

There are laws against frivolous litigation? Why they hell aren't they used more??
 
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.

:lol:

There are laws against frivolous litigation? Why they hell aren't they used more??

Not laws per se. This was an ethics violation, wasn't it? If so, the opponent usually has to ask for Rule 11. In some places the judge can slap it on without a motion but I'm not up on CA stuff. Where's George?

But SCOTUS is the final arbiter on ethics too. This is no surprise.

And many mooooore! :D
 
LOL now there is a combination i would never have believed
i doubt she is any good at either job

i think even they had to know she's an idiot.

i also heard she's a martial arts instructor or somesuch. either way she's a loon and i'm always struck by the irony that the chief birfer is someone who wasn't even born here.
 
BHO is still a non-NBC usurping the Presidency, now apparently with the help of corruption on the SC.
 
BHO is still a non-NBC usurping the Presidency, now apparently with the help of corruption on the SC.

Right, because the Conservative Supreme Court and it's most Conservative members would help what is supposedly the most Socialist President in history why? This is using your logic of course.
 
BHO is still a non-NBC usurping the Presidency, now apparently with the help of corruption on the SC.

Right, because the Conservative Supreme Court and it's most Conservative members would help what is supposedly the most Socialist President in history why? This is using your logic of course.

Here I thought WetboroBaptistforlife was gone and good riddance. *sigh*

Logic and the American Taliban don't mix, you should know that by now Modbert. It's like garlic and vampires.
 
Supreme Court upholds ‘birther’ sanction | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has upheld a $20,000 fine against a leader of the movement challenging President Barack Obama’s citizenship.

The high court on Monday refused to block a federal judge’s October 2009 ruling that required California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz to pay the $20,000 fine for filing a “frivolous” litigation. The judge said Taitz attempted to misuse the federal courts to push a political agenda.

Justice Samuel Alito on Monday rejected Taitz’s second request to block the sanctions. Justice Clarence Thomas had rejected the request earlier.

:lol:


What are you going to do in 2012 when obama has to produce an actual birthcertifacte to be put on the ballot in Arizona?

Obama Must Show Birth Certificate in Arizona - Arizona Passes Birther Bill
Obama Must Show Birth Certificate in Arizona -... | Gather
 
What are you going to do in 2012 when obama has to produce an actual birthcertifacte to be put on the ballot in Arizona?

Obama Must Show Birth Certificate in Arizona - Arizona Passes Birther Bill
Obama Must Show Birth Certificate in Arizona -... | Gather

He'll show it, making him the ultimate troll. Though a even bigger troll move would be to not even run in Arizona. :rofl:

Really he's goin g to go to hawaii and get the one there? his real birth certificate? That will finally end this won't it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top